0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Dye Visualization of In-Line Twin Synthetic Jets in Crossflows—A Parametric Study

[+] Author and Article Information
Xin Wen

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: wenxin84@sjtu.edu.cn

Hui Tang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong
e-mail: h.tang@polyu.edu.hk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 20, 2016; final manuscript received March 28, 2017; published online June 20, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Peter Vorobieff.

J. Fluids Eng 139(9), 091203 (Jun 20, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1111; doi: 10.1115/1.4036410 History: Received February 20, 2016; Revised March 28, 2017

This paper presents a parametric study on the interaction of twin circular synthetic jets (SJs) that are in line with a crossflow over a flat plate. The resulting vortex structures under different actuation, and flow conditions are investigated using two-plane dye visualization in a water tunnel. The influence of four independent nondimensional parameters, i.e., the Reynolds number (ReL), Strouhal number (St), velocity ratio (VR), and phase difference (Δϕ), on the behavior of the twin SJs is studied. It is found that the increase of Reynolds number causes the SJ-induced vortex structures more turbulent, making the twin SJ interaction less organized. The increase of velocity ratio pushes the occurrence of interaction further away from the wall and makes the resulting vortex structures more sustainable. The St has no obvious influence on the interaction. And three types of vortex structures are observed under different phase differences: one combined vortex, two completely separated vortices, and partially interacting vortex structures. Based on this parametric study, a simple model is proposed to predict the resulting vortex pattern for the twin SJ interaction.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Seifert, A. , and Pack, L. G. , 1999, “ Oscillatory Control of Separation at High Reynolds Numbers,” AIAA J., 37(9), pp. 1062–1071. [CrossRef]
Amitay, M. , Smith, D. R. , Kibens, V. , Parekh, D. E. , and Glezer, A. , 2001, “ Aerodynamic Flow Control Over an Unconventional Airfoil Using Synthetic Jet Actuators,” AIAA J., 39(3), pp. 361–370. [CrossRef]
Amitay, M. , and Glezer, A. , 2002, “ Role of Actuation Frequency in Controlled Flow Reattachment Over a Stalled Airfoil,” AIAA J., 40(2), pp. 209–216. [CrossRef]
Zhong, S. , Jabbal, M. , Tang, H. , Garcillan, L. , Guo, F. , Wood, N. , and Warsop, C. , 2007, “ Toward the Design of Synthetic-Jet Actuators for Full-Scale Flight Conditions,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 78(3), pp. 283–307. [CrossRef]
Yen, J. , and Ahmed, N. A. , 2012, “ Parametric Study of Dynamic Stall Flow Field With Synthetic Jet Actuation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(7), p. 071106. [CrossRef]
Tang, H. , Salunkhe, P. , Zheng, Y. , Du, J. , and Wu, Y. , 2014, “ On the Use of Synthetic Jet Actuator Arrays for Active Flow Separation Control,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 57, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Pavlova, A. A. , Otani, K. , and Amitay, M. , 2008, “ Active Control of Sprays Using a Single Synthetic Jet Actuator,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29(1), pp. 131–148. [CrossRef]
Al-Atabi, M. , 2011, “ Experimental Investigation of the Use of Synthetic Jets for Mixing in Vessels,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 133(9), p. 094503. [CrossRef]
Xia, Q. , and Zhong, S. , 2014, “ Enhancement of Laminar Flow Mixing Using a Pair of Staggered Lateral Synthetic Jets,” Sens. Actuators, A, 207, pp. 75–83. [CrossRef]
Rathnasingham, R. , and Breuer, K. S. , 2003, “ Active Control of Turbulent Boundary Layers,” J. Fluid Mech., 495, pp. 209–233. [CrossRef]
Crook, A. , and Wood, N. , 2001, “ Measurements and Visualisations of Synthetic Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-0145.
Ramasamy, M. , Wilson, J. S. , and Martin, P. B. , 2010, “ Interaction of Synthetic Jet With Boundary Layer Using Microscopic Particle Image Velocimetry,” J. Aircr., 47(2), pp. 404–422. [CrossRef]
Zhong, S. , and Zhang, S. , 2013, “ Further Examination of the Mechanism of Round Synthetic Jets in Delaying Turbulent Flow Separation,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 91(1), pp. 177–208. [CrossRef]
Jabbal, M. , and Zhong, S. , 2008, “ The Near Wall Effect of Synthetic Jets in a Boundary Layer,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29(1), pp. 119–130. [CrossRef]
Zhou, J. , and Zhong, S. , 2010, “ Coherent Structures Produced by the Interaction Between Synthetic Jets and a Laminar Boundary Layer and Their Surface Shear Stress Patterns,” Comput. Fluids, 39(8), pp. 1296–1313. [CrossRef]
Wen, X. , and Tang, H. , 2014, “ On Hairpin Vortex Induced by Circular Synthetic Jets in Laminar and Turbulent Boundary Layers,” Comput. Fluids, 95, pp. 1–18. [CrossRef]
Jabbal, M. , and Zhong, S. , 2010, “ Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements of the Interaction of Synthetic Jets With a Zero-Pressure Gradient Laminar Boundary Layer,” Phys. Fluids, 22(6), p. 063603. [CrossRef]
Zhang, S. , and Zhong, S. , 2010, “ Experimental Investigation of Flow Separation Control Using an Array of Synthetic Jets,” AIAA J., 48(3), pp. 611–623. [CrossRef]
Hasnain, Z. , Trollinger, L. N. , Hubbard, J. E. , and Flatau, A. B. , 2015, “ Dynamic Flow Control Over Aerodynamic Bodies Using Phased Array Vectored Synthetic Jet Actuation,” AIAA Paper No. 2015-2426.
Zhao, G. , Zhao, Q. , Gu, Y. , and Chen, X. , 2016, “ Experimental Investigations for Parametric Effects of Dual Synthetic Jets on Delaying Stall of a Thick Airfoil,” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 29(2), pp. 346–357. [CrossRef]
Kolar, V. , Takao, H. , Todorki, T. , Savory, E. , Okamoto, S. , and Toy, N. , 2003, “ Vorticity Transport Within Twin Jets in Cross Flow,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 27(5), pp. 563–571. [CrossRef]
Watson, M. , Jaworski, A. J. , and Wood, N. J. , 2003, “ Contribution to the Understanding of Flow Interactions Between Multiple Synthetic Jets,” AIAA J., 41(4), pp. 747–749. [CrossRef]
Wen, X. , and Tang, H. , 2015, “ Effect of Phase Difference on the Interaction of Hairpin Vortices Induced by In-Line Twin Synthetic Jets,” J. Visualization, 19(1), pp. 79–87. [CrossRef]
Wen, X. , Tang, H. , and Duan, F. , 2015, “ Vortex Dynamics of In-Line Twin Synthetic Jets in a Laminar Boundary Layer,” Phys. Fluids, 27(8), p. 083601. [CrossRef]
Wen, X. , Tang, H. , and Duan, F. , 2016, “ Interaction of In-Line Twin Synthetic Jets With a Separated Flow,” Phys. Fluids, 28(4), p. 043602. [CrossRef]
Liddle, S. C. , and Wood, N. J. , 2005, “ Investigation Into Clustering of Synthetic Jet Actuators for Flow Separation Control Applications,” Aeronaut. J., 109(1091), pp. 35–44. [CrossRef]
Iai, T. , Iwabuchi, K. , Motosuke, M. , and Honami, S. , 2010, “ Vortex Behavior of In-Line Synthetic Jets in Cross Flow at Low Reynolds Number,” AIAA Paper No. 2010-4412.
Honami, S. , and Motosuke, M. , 2012, “ Vortex Interaction of In-Line Synthetic Jets Injected at Different Phase in Low Reynolds Number Cross Flow,” AIAA Paper No. 2012-3243.
Jabbal, M. , Wu, J. , and Zhong, S. , 2006, “ The Performance of Round Synthetic Jets in Quiescent Flow,” Aeronaut. J., 110(1108), pp. 385–393. [CrossRef]
Tang, H. , and Zhong, S. , 2006, “ Incompressible Flow Model of Synthetic Jet Actuators,” AIAA J., 44(4), pp. 908–912. [CrossRef]
Zhou, J. , Tang, H. , and Zhong, S. , 2009, “ Vortex Roll-Up Criterion for Synthetic Jets,” AIAA J., 47(5), pp. 1252–1262. [CrossRef]
Holman, R. , Utturkar, Y. , Mittal, R. , Smith, B. L. , and Cattafesta, L. , 2005, “ Formation Criterion for Synthetic Jets,” AIAA J., 43(10), pp. 2110–2116. [CrossRef]
Milanovic, I. M. , and Zaman, K. B. M. Q. , 2005, “ Synthetic Jets in Cross-Flow,” AIAA J., 43(5), pp. 929–940. [CrossRef]
Gharib, M. , Rambod, E. , and Shariff, K. , 1998, “ A Universal Time Scale for Vortex Ring Formation,” J. Fluid Mech., 360, pp. 121–140. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of (a) the test plate and (b) the twin SJ actuators (all numbers are in mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the two-plane dye visualization system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Evolution of vortex structures in a crossflow for case 4. Upper two rows: two-plane views of a single SJ. Bottom two rows: two-plane views of twin SJs with zero phase difference. The horizontal line represents the edge of the boundary layer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Two-plane dye visualization showing the influence of ReL on single- and twin-SJ-induced vortex structures. The twin SJs are introduced with zero phase difference. The horizontal line represents the edge of the boundary layer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Two-plane dye visualization showing the influence of VR on single- and twin-SJ-induced vortex structures. The twin SJs are introduced with zero phase difference. The horizontal line represents the edge of the boundary layer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Two-plane dye visualization showing the influence of St on single- and twin-SJ-induced vortex structures. The twin SJs are introduced with zero phase difference. The horizontal line represents the edge of the boundary layer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Two-plane dye images of the twin SJs at various phase differences for case 4. The horizontal line represents the edge of the boundary layer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Summary of side view dye visualization at different phase difference for all cases, showing the spacing and resulting interaction between the vortices produced by the twin SJ actuators. The horizontal line represents the edge of the boundary layer.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In