0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Cavitating Flow in a Low Specific Speed Centrifugal Pump With Different Surface Roughness

[+] Author and Article Information
Phillip Limbach

Chair of Hydraulic Fluid Machinery,
Ruhr Universität Bochum,
Universitätsstr. 150,
Bochum 44801, Germany
e-mail: phillip.limbach@ruhr-uni-bochum.de

Romuald Skoda

Chair of Hydraulic Fluid Machinery,
Ruhr Universität Bochum,
Universitätsstr. 150,
Bochum 44801, Germany
e-mail: romuald.skoda@ruhr-uni-bochum.de

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 21, 2016; final manuscript received April 18, 2017; published online July 6, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Matevz Dular.

J. Fluids Eng 139(10), 101201 (Jul 06, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1619; doi: 10.1115/1.4036673 History: Received September 21, 2016; Revised April 18, 2017

Three-dimensional (3D) simulations with ansys cfx 16.1 as well as measurements of the cavitating flow in a low specific speed centrifugal pump (nq = 12 min−1) are performed for different operation conditions and varying surface roughness. Surface roughness is considered by wall functions in the flow simulations. Good agreement between measured and calculated head is achieved for noncavitating flow. Net positive suction head (NPSH3%) rises toward overload due to incidence, flow separation, and vapor zones at the volute tongue. The NPSH3% rise is slightly higher for rough walls according to measurements and significantly overestimated by the wall function approach, irrespective of the roughness level in the simulation. A low-Reynolds number approach at the volute tongue leads to a more accurate prediction of NPSH3% than wall functions, at the cost of high computational effort.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Wang, Y. , and Wang, W. J. , 2012, “ Applicability of Eddy Viscosity Turbulence Models in Low Specific Speed Centrifugal Pump,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 15(6), p. 062013.
Benigni, H. , Jaberg, H. , Yeung, H. , Salisbury, T. , Berry, O. , and Collins, T. , 2012, “ Numerical Simulation of Low Specific Speed American Petroleum Institute Pumps in Part-Load Operation and Comparison With Test Rig Results,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(2), p. 024501. [CrossRef]
Limbach, P. , Kimoto, M. , Deimel, C. , and Skoda, R. , 2014, “ Numerical 3D Simulation of the Cavitating Flow in a Centrifugal Pump With Low Specific Speed and Evaluation of the Suction Head,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26089.
Gülich, J. F. , 2010, Centrifugal Pumps, Springer, Berlin.
Varley, F. A. , 1961, “ Effects of Impeller Design and Surface Roughness on the Performance of Centrifugal Pumps,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 175(1961), pp. 955–969. [CrossRef]
Tamm, A. , Eikmeier, L. , and Stoffel, B. , 2002, “ The Influences of Surface Roughness on Head, Power Input and Efficiency of Centrifugal Pumps,” XXI IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, Oct. 6–9, pp. 87–93.
Gülich, J. F. , 2003, “ Effect of Reynolds Number and Surface Roughness on the Efficiency of Centrifugal Pumps,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 125(4), pp. 670–679. [CrossRef]
Worster, R. C. , 1963, “ The Flow in Volutes and Its Effect on Centrifugal Pump Performance,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 177(1), pp. 843–875. [CrossRef]
Juckelandt, K. , Bleeck, S. , and Wurm, F. H. , 2015, “ Analysis of Losses in Centrifugal Pumps With Low Specific Speed With Smooth and Rough Walls,” 11th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid dynamics & Thermodynamics (ETC11), Madrid, Spain, Mar. 23–27, Paper No. ETC2015-068. http://aerospace-europe.eu/media/books/ETC2015-068.pdf
Wo, A. M. , and Bons, J. P. , 1993, “ Flow Physics Leading to System Instability in a Centrifugal Pump,” ASME J. Turbomach., 116(4), pp. 612–620. [CrossRef]
Kelder, J. D. H. , Dijkers, R. J. H. , van Esch, B. P. M. , and Kruyt, N. P. , 2001, “ Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Flow in the Volute of a Low Specific-Speed Pump,” Fluid Dyn. Res., 28(4), pp. 267–280. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, D. C. , 2006, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries, La Canada, CA.
Juckelandt, K. , and Wurm, F. H. , 2015, “ Applicability of Wall-Function Approach in Simulations of Turbomachines,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42014.
Limbach, P. , Müller, T. , Blume, M. , and Skoda, R. , 2016, “ Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Cavitating Flow in a Low Specific Speed Centrifugal Pump and Assessment of the Influence of Surface Roughness on Head Prediction,” International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC), Honolulu, HI, Apr. 10–15, Paper No. 288. http://isromac-isimet.univ-lille1.fr/upload_dir/finalpaper/288.revisedPaper_ISROMAC_Limbach.pdf
Koop, A. H. , 2008, “ Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Three-Dimensional Sheet Cavitation,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. http://doc.utwente.nl/61072/1/thesis_A_Koop.pdf
Frobenius, M. , Schilling, R. , Friedrichs, J. , and Kosyna, G. , 2003, “ Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Cavitating Flow in a Centrifugal Pump Impeller,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2002-31006.
Zhang, D. , Shi, W. , Pan, D. , and Dubuisson, M. , 2015, “ Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Tip Leakage Vortex Cavitation Patterns and Mechanisms in an Axial Flow Pump,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 137(12), p. 121103. [CrossRef]
Fu, Y. , Yuan, J. , Yuan, S. , Pave, G. , d'Agostino, L. , Huang, P. , and Li, X. , 2014, “ Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Flow Phenomena in a Centrifugal Pump Operating Under Low Flow Rates,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 137(1), p. 011102. [CrossRef]
Nohmi, M. , 2012, “ A Review: A Basic Research on Total Prediction System for Cavitation Phenomena,” Eighth International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV), Singapore, Aug. 13–16, pp. 466–470.
Schiavello, B. , and Visser, F. C. , 2009, “ Pump Cavitation—Various NPSHR Criteria, NPSHA Margins, and Impeller Life Expectancy,” 25th International Pump Users Symposium, Houston, TX, Feb. 23–26, pp. 113–144.
Abernethy, R. B. , Benedict, R. P. , and Dowdell, R. B. , 1985, “ ASME Measurement Uncertainty,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 107(2), pp. 161–164. [CrossRef]
Zwart, P. J. , Gerber, A. G. , and Belamri, T. , 2004, “ A Two-Phase Flow Model for Predicting Cavitation Dynamics,” ICMF International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama, Japan, May 30–June 4, Paper No. 152.
Rayleigh, L. , 1917, “ On the Pressure Developed in a Liquid During the Collapse of a Spherical Cavity,” Philos. Mag. Ser. 6, 34(200), pp. 94–98. [CrossRef]
Johnsen, E. , and Colonius, T. , 2009, “ Numerical Simulations of Non-Spherical Bubble Collapse,” J. Fluid Mech., 629(1), pp. 231–262. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brennen, C. E. , 2011, Hydrodynamics of Pumps, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Plesset, M. S. , and Prosperetti, A. , 1977, “ Bubble Dynamics and Cavitation,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 9(1), pp. 145–185. [CrossRef]
Bakir, F. , Rey, R. , Gerber, A. G. , Belamri, T. , and Hutchinson, B. , 2004, “ Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Cavitating Behavior of an Inducer,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 10(1), pp. 15–25. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R. , 1994, “ Two-Equation Eddy Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1598–1605. [CrossRef]
Grotjans, H. , and Menter, F. R. , 1998, “ Wall Functions for General Application CFD Codes,” Fourth Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 1112–1117.
Smirnov, P. E. , and Menter, F. R. , 2009, “ Sensitization of the SST Turbulence Model to Rotation and Curvature by Applying the Spalart-Shur Correction Term,” ASME J. Turbomach., 131(4), p. 041010. [CrossRef]
Lechner, R. , and Menter, F. , 2004, “ Development of a Rough Wall Boundary Condition for ω-Based Turbulence Models,” Technical Report, ANSYS, Otterfing, Germany, Report No. TR-04-04.
Grein, H. , 1975, “ Einige Bemerkungen Über die Oberflächenrauheit der Benetzten Komponenten Hydraulischer Grossmaschinen,” Escher Wyss Mitt., 1, pp. 34–40.
Tamm, A. , and Stoffel, B. , 2002, “ The Influences of Gap Clearance and Surface Roughness on Leakage Loss and Disc Friction of Centrifugal Pumps,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2002-31324.
Numachi, F. , Oba, R. , and Chida, I. , 1965, “ Effect of Surface Roughness on Cavitation Performance of Hydrofoils—Report 1,” J. Basic Eng., 87(2), pp. 495–502. [CrossRef]
Bachert, R. , Stoffel, B. , and Dular, M. , 2010, “ Unsteady Cavitation at the Tongue of the Volute of a Centrifugal Pump,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 132(6), p. 061301. [CrossRef]
Dular, M. , Bachert, R. , and Širok, B. , 2004, “ Relationship Between Cavitation Structures and Cavitation Damage,” Wear, 257(11), pp. 1176–1184. [CrossRef]
Reboud, J. L. , Stutz, B. , and Coutier, O. , 1998, “ Two-Phase Flow Structure of Cavitation: Experiment and Modelling of Unsteady Effects,” Third International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France, Apr. 7–10.
Coutier-Delgosha, O. , Fortes-Patella, R. , and Reboud, J. L. , 2003, “ Evaluation of the Turbulence Model Influence on the Numerical Simulations of Unsteady Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 125(1), pp. 38–45. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Closed-circuit centrifugal pump test rig: 1—tank, 2—closed ball valves, 3—pressure transducers, 4—flow meter, 5—throttle, 6—connection to vacuum pump, 7—vacuum pump, CP1, 2—centrifugal pumps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Measured head drop curves for several flow rates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Computational domain and grid at the volute tongue

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Head characteristics dependent on grid resolution and wall treatment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Head characteristics dependent on the surface roughness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Snapshot of the TKE at the volute tongue for grids CWF, FWF, and FLR at an arbitrary impeller position, which is the same for all grids

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Snapshot of the cavitation zones illustrated by isosurfaces of the vapor volume fraction (αv=0.1): Sim_CWF_smooth (a) 0.7 φ2,opt, (b) 1.0 φ2,opt, (c) 1.4 φ2,opt, and (d) Sim_FLR_smooth, 1.4 φ2,opt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Assignment of the pressure losses leading to a 3% head drop to impeller and volute

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

σ3% characteristics dependent on surface roughness, grid resolution, and wall treatment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time sequence of cloud cavitation at the volute tongue for one impeller blade cycle at 1.4 φ2,opt and ∼σ3%

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In