Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Effect of Gurney Flaps on an Elliptical Airfoil

[+] Author and Article Information
Lance W. Traub

Aerospace and Mechanical
Engineering Department,
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University,
Prescott, AZ 86301
e-mail: traubl@erau.edu

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 11, 2016; final manuscript received May 2, 2017; published online July 19, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Feng Liu.

J. Fluids Eng 139(10), 101102 (Jul 19, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1437; doi: 10.1115/1.4037037 History: Received July 11, 2016; Revised May 02, 2017

A low-speed wind tunnel investigation is presented characterizing the impact of Gurney flaps on an elliptical airfoil. The chordwise attachment location and height of the flaps were varied, as was the Reynolds number. The results showed strong nonlinearities in the lift curve which were present for all tested geometries. Flap effectiveness was seen to diminish as the flap was moved closer to the trailing edge stemming from flap submersion in separated flow. For the tested cases, the measured lift coefficients showed a weak Re dependency. The upper airfoil surface was shown to carry approximately 80% of the total lift load. The top surface caused a pitching moment reversal associated with nonlinearity in the lift curve.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Model geometric details

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Data repeatability and consistency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Effect of α on Cp traces, Re = 75,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Surface skin friction patterns over clean airfoil, flow is left to right

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Observed separation locations for the clean airfoil

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of flap height and location on Cl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of flap height and location on Cd

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of flap height and location on Cm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Summary plot of key performance parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Dependence of Cdo and Clo on Re, α = 0 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of flap location on measured Cp, h/c = 0.04

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Upper and lower surface lift and moment components




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In