Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

An Assessment of the Two-Layer Quasi-Laminar Theory of Relaminarization Through Recent High-Re Accelerated Turbulent Boundary Layer Experiments

[+] Author and Article Information
Rajesh Ranjan

Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for
Advanced Scientific Research,
Bangalore 560064, India
e-mail: rajesh@jncasr.ac.in

Roddam Narasimha

Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for
Advanced Scientific Research,
Bangalore 560064, India
e-mail: roddam@jncasr.ac.in

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 27, 2017; final manuscript received June 6, 2017; published online August 25, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Pierre E. Sullivan.

J. Fluids Eng 139(11), 111205 (Aug 25, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: FE-17-1058; doi: 10.1115/1.4037059 History: Received January 27, 2017; Revised June 06, 2017

The phenomenon of relaminarization is observed in many flow situations, including that of an initially turbulent boundary layer (TBL) subjected to strong favorable pressure gradients (FPG). As several experiments on relaminarizing flows have indicated, TBLs subjected to high pressure gradients do not follow the universal log-law, and (for this and other reasons) the prediction of boundary layer (BL) parameters using current turbulence models has not been successful. However, a quasi-laminar theory (QLT; proposed in 1973), based on a two-layer model to explain the later stages of relaminarization, showed good agreement with the experimental data available at that time. These data were mostly at relatively low Re and hence left the precise role of viscosity undefined. QLT, therefore, could not be assessed at high-Re. Recent experiments, however, have provided more comprehensive data and extended the Reynolds number range to nearly 5 × 103 in momentum thickness. These data provide a basis for a reassessment of QLT, which is revisited here with an improved predictive code. It is demonstrated that even for these high-Re flows subjected to high acceleration, QLT provides good agreement with experimental results, and therefore, has the potential to substitute for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations in high FPG regions.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Narasimha, R. , and Sreenivasan, K. R. , 1973, “ Relaminarization in Highly Accelerated Turbulent Boundary Layers,” J. Fluid Mech., 61(3), pp. 417–447. [CrossRef]
Wilson, D. , and Pope, J. , 1954, “ Convective Heat Transfer to Gas Turbine Blade Surfaces,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 168(1), pp. 861–876. [CrossRef]
Jagannathan, S. , Schwänen, M. , and Duggleby, A. , 2012, “ Low Pressure Turbine Relaminarization Bubble Characterization Using Massively-Parallel Large Eddy Simulations,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(2), p. 021102.
Ranjan, R. , Deshpande, S. , and Narasimha, R. , 2014, “ Direct Numerical Simulation of Compressible Flow Past a Low Pressure Turbine Blade at High Incidence,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2014-21773.
Halstead, D. , Okiishi, T. , and Wisler, D. , 2007, “ Boundary Layer Development on a Turbine Blade in a Linear Cascade,” Minnowbrook I: 1993 Workshop on End-Stage Boundary Layer Transition, J. E. LaGraff , ed., Report No. NASA/CP-2007-214667.
van Dam, C. , Vijgen, P. , Yip, L. , and Potter, R. , 1993, “ Leading-Edge Transition and Relaminarization Phenomena on a Subsonic High-Lift System,” AIAA Paper No. 93-3140. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930061157
Mukund, R. , Narasimha, R. , Viswanath, P. , and Crouch, J. , 2012, “ Multiple Laminar-Turbulent Transition Cycles Around a Swept Leading Edge,” Exp. Fluids, 53(6), pp. 1915–1927. [CrossRef]
Senoo, Y. , 1956, “ Boundary Layer on the End Wall of a Turbine Nozzle Cascade,” MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Technical Report No. 35.
Sternberg, J. , 1954, “ The Transition From a Turbulent to a Laminar Boundary Layer,” Army Ballistic Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, Technical Report No. BRL-906.
Narasimha, R. , and Viswanath, P. , 1975, “ Reverse Transition at an Expansion Corner in Supersonic Flow,” AIAA J., 13(5), pp. 693–695. [CrossRef]
Narasimha, R. , and Sreenivasan, K. R. , 1979, “ Relaminarization of Fluid Flows,” Adv. Appl. Mech., 19, pp. 221–309. [CrossRef]
Narasimha, R. , 1983, “ Relaminarization—Magnetohydrodynamic and Otherwise,” Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut., 84, pp. 30–52.
Warnack, D. , and Fernholz, H. , 1998, “ The Effects of a Favourable Pressure Gradient and of the Reynolds Number on an Incompressible Axisymmetric Turbulent Boundary Layer. Part 2. The Boundary Layer With Relaminarization,” J. Fluid Mech., 359, pp. 357–381. [CrossRef]
Dhawan, S. , and Narasimha, R. , 1958, “ Some Properties of Boundary Layer Flow During the Transition From Laminar to Turbulent Motion,” J. Fluid Mech., 3(4), pp. 418–436. [CrossRef]
Launder, B. E. , 1964, “ Laminarization of the Turbulent Boundary Layer by Acceleration,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Technical Report No. 77.
Kline, S. , Reynolds, W. , Schraub, F. , and Runstadler, P. , 1967, “ The Structure of Turbulent Boundary Layers,” J. Fluid Mech., 30(4), pp. 741–773. [CrossRef]
Blackwelder, R. F. , and Kovasznay, L. S. , 1972, “ Large-Scale Motion of a Turbulent Boundary Layer During Relaminarization,” J. Fluid Mech., 53(1), pp. 61–83. [CrossRef]
Patel, V. , 1965, “ Calibration of the Preston Tube and Limitations on Its Use in Pressure Gradients,” J. Fluid Mech., 23(1), pp. 185–208. [CrossRef]
Patel, V. , and Head, M. , 1968, “ Reversion of Turbulent to Laminar Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 34(2), pp. 371–392. [CrossRef]
Cal, R. B. , and Castillo, L. , 2008, “ Similarity Analysis of Favorable Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers With Eventual Quasilaminarization,” Phys. Fluids, 20(10), p. 105106. [CrossRef]
Badri Narayanan, M. , and Ramjee, V. , 1969, “ On the Criteria for Reverse Transition in a Two-Dimensional Boundary Layer Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 35(2), pp. 225–241. [CrossRef]
Bourassa, C. , and Thomas, F. , 2009, “ An Experimental Investigation of a Highly Accelerated Turbulent Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 634, pp. 359–404. [CrossRef]
Narasimha, R. , and Prabhu, A. , 1972, “ Equilibrium and Relaxation in Turbulent Wakes,” J. Fluid Mech., 54(1), pp. 1–17. [CrossRef]
Sreenivasan, K. R. , 1982, “ Laminarescent, Relaminarizing and Retransitional Flows,” Acta Mech., 44(1–2), pp. 1–48. [CrossRef]
Araya, G. , Castillo, L. , and Hussain, F. , 2015, “ The Log Behaviour of the Reynolds Shear Stress in Accelerating Turbulent Boundary Layers,” J. Fluid Mech., 775, pp. 189–200. [CrossRef]
Escudier, M. , Abdel-Hameed, A. , Johnson, M. , and Sutcliffe, C. , 1998, “ Laminarisation and Re-Transition of a Turbulent Boundary Layer Subjected to Favourable Pressure Gradient,” Exp. Fluids, 25(5–6), pp. 491–502. [CrossRef]
Ichimiya, M. , Nakamura, I. , and Yamashita, S. , 1998, “ Properties of a Relaminarizing Turbulent Boundary Layer Under a Favorable Pressure Gradient,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 17(1), pp. 37–48. [CrossRef]
Nagib, H. M. , and Chauhan, K. A. , 2008, “ Variations of von Kármán Coefficient in Canonical Flows,” Phys. Fluids, 20(10), p. 101518. [CrossRef]
Monkewitz, P. A. , 2017, “ Revisiting the Quest for a Universal Log-Law and the Role of Pressure Gradient in ‘Canonical’ Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows,” arXiv Preprint arXiv:1702.03661. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.03661
Piomelli, U. , and Yuan, J. , 2013, “ Numerical Simulations of Spatially Developing, Accelerating Boundary Layers,” Phys. Fluids, 25(10), p. 101304. [CrossRef]
Patwardhan, S. S. , 2014, “ Effect of Favourable Pressure Gradient on Turbulence in Boundary Layers,” Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Spalart, P. R. , 2000, “ Strategies for Turbulence Modelling and Simulations,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 21(3), pp. 252–263. [CrossRef]
Spalart, P. R. , 2015, “ Philosophies and Fallacies in Turbulence Modeling,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 74, pp. 1–15. [CrossRef]
Launder, B. E. , and Jones, W. P. , 1969, “ On the Prediction of Laminarisation,” HM Stationery Office, London, Report No. ARC CP 1036. http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/reports/arc/cp/1036.pdf
Oriji, U. R. , Karimisani, S. , and Tucker, P. G. , 2014, “ RANS Modeling of Accelerating Boundary Layers,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 137(1), p. 011202. [CrossRef]
Jones, W. , and Launder, B. , 1972, “ The Prediction of Laminarization With a Two-Equation Model of Turbulence,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(2), pp. 301–314. [CrossRef]
Kreskovsky, J. , Shamroth, S. , and McDonald, H. , 1975, “ Application of a General Boundary Layer Analysis to Turbulent Boundary Layers Subjected to Strong Favorable Pressure Gradients,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 97(2), pp. 217–224. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R. , Smirnov, P. E. , Liu, T. , and Avancha, R. , 2015, “ A One-Equation Local Correlation-Based Transition Model,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 95(4), pp. 583–619. [CrossRef]
Cebeci, T. , and Smith, A. , 1968, “ A Finite-Difference Solution of the Incompressible Turbulent Boundary-Layer Equations by an Eddy-Viscosity Concept,” Douglas Aircraft Company, Long Beach, CA.
Clauser, F. H. , 1956, “ The Turbulent Boundary Layer,” Adv. Appl. Mech., 4, pp. 1–51. [CrossRef]
Spence, D. , 1956, “ The Development of Turbulent Boundary Layers,” J. Aeronaut. Sci., 23(1), pp. 3–15. [CrossRef]
Head, M. , 1960, “ Entrainment in the Turbulent Boundary Layer,” HM Stationery Office, London, Report No. ARC-RM/315.
Moses, H. L. , 1968, “ A Strip-Integral Method for Predicting the Behavior of Turbulent Boundary Layers,” AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conference on Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers, Stanford, CA, Aug. 18–25, pp. 76–82.
Rumsey, C. L. , and Spalart, P. R. , 2009, “ Turbulence Model Behavior in Low Reynolds Number Regions of Aerodynamic Flowfields,” AIAA J., 47(4), pp. 982–993. [CrossRef]
Sreenivasan, K. R. , and Narasimha, R. , 1974, “ Rapid Distortion of Shear Bangalore, India, Flows,” Aeronautical Society of India Silver Jubilee Technical Conference, Bangalore, India, pp. 2.11–2.14.
Araya, G. , Castillo, L. , and Hussain, F. , 2016, “ DNS of Turbulent Boundary Layers in the Quasi-Laminarization Process,” Progress in Wall Turbulence 2, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 63–71. [CrossRef]
Schetz, J. A. , 1993, Boundary Layer Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wazzan, A. , Okamura, T. , and Smith, A. , 1968, “ Spatial and Temporal Stability Charts for the Falkner–Skan Boundary-Layer Profiles,” Defense Technical Information Center, Ft. Belvoir, VA, Report No. DAC-67086. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/712198.pdf
Sreenivasan, K. R. , 1974, “ Notes on the Experimental Data on Reverting Boundary Layers,” Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, Report No. 72 FM2.
Reichardt, H. , 1951, “ Complete Description of Turbulent Velocity Profiles in Smooth Ducts,” ZAMM, 31(7), pp. 208–219. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

“Soft” relaminarization due to strong FPG. Note that the Reynolds stress does not go down in absolute magnitude in the “laminarized” region but becomes negligible compared to imposed dynamic pressure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Velocity distribution in the relaminarizing region for various flows

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Prediction using TBL code for BT-flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Reynolds shear stress along streamlines for BT and WF2, exhibiting stress freezing in the outer parts of the BL (high values of ψ/ν)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The two-layer model. Matched asymptotic solution.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Different pressure gradient parameters proposed for the prediction of onset of relaminarization. Triangle: K = 3 × 10−6, Circle: Δp = −0.025, Square: Λ = 50 (see Table 1).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Edge velocities for outer (Ue) and inner (Us) layer calculations for BT flow. Downstream of the relaminarizing region, (Ue − Us) decreases rapidly.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Velocity gradients for BT flow. (dUe/dx)0 indicates streamwise velocity gradient at x = x0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Uniformly valid solution using the two-layer model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Predictions for BT and WF flows using TBL and QLT. Dashed and solid thick lines represent predictions with TBL and QLT, respectively. Markers are experimental values. The shaded portion shows the laminarized region (x1 to xrt), where QLT is expected to be valid.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of velocity profiles from QLT with experiment: (a) BT at x − x0 = 0.22 m and (b) WF4 at x − x0 = 0.245 m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

BL Reynolds numbers in the BT-flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

BL Reynolds numbers in the laminarized region in other studies




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In