Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Steady-State Heat-Flow Coupling Field of a High-Power Magnetorheological Fluid Clutch Utilizing Liquid Cooling

[+] Author and Article Information
Daoming Wang

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Hefei University of Technology,
Hefei 230009, China;
School of Mechatronic Engineering,
China University of Mining and Technology,
Xuzhou 221116, China
e-mail: cumtcmeewdm@hotmail.com

Bin Zi

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Hefei University of Technology,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: binzi.cumt@163.com

Sen Qian

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Hefei University of Technology,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: qiansencumt@126.com

Jun Qian

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Hefei University of Technology,
Hefei 230009, China
e-mail: qianjun@hfut.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 12, 2016; final manuscript received June 20, 2017; published online August 11, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Bart van Esch.

J. Fluids Eng 139(11), 111105 (Aug 11, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: FE-16-1744; doi: 10.1115/1.4037171 History: Received November 12, 2016; Revised June 20, 2017

Compared with traditional speed regulation (SR) approaches like variable frequency and hydraulic coupling, magnetorheological clutch (MRC) provides a more superior solution for high-efficiency energy saving SR. However, recent developments have demonstrated that severe heating is an outstanding challenge for MRC, especially in high-power applications. Among commonly used cooling methods, liquid cooling offers a viable alternative for the problem. Aiming at pre-evaluating the cooling efficiency of a liquid-cooled MRC in high-power situations, this study introduces a heat-flow coupling simulation method. In this paper, theoretical basis for the simulation is presented first, which is followed by an illustration of the heat-flow coupling simulation. This paper details the simulation model establishment, finite element meshing (FEM), boundary conditions, and simulation parameters. After the simulations, the results concerning the steady flow field of the internal coolant, along with the steady-state temperature fields of MRC, magnetorheological (MR) fluids and the coolant are presented and discussed. Finally, several heating tests of an MRC prototype under various operation conditions are performed and the results verify the correctness and rationality of the simulation.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometric model of the liquid-cooled MRC: (a) full-size model (transparent), (b) quarter of the model (transparent), and (c) sectional model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Viscosity–temperature curve of the machine oil

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sketch of boundary conditions for MRC: (a) full-size model and (b) quarter of the model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Specific matches for the comparative study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Streamline of the internal coolant in MRC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Velocity vector of the internal coolant: (a) overall velocity distribution, (b) sectional velocity vector near inlet 1, and (c) tangential velocity vector of the coolant in the cavity of the inner input rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Sectional velocity vector of the coolant around inlet 1 with different inlet velocities: (a) vin = 0.83 m/s, (b) vin = 1.66 m/s, and (c) vin = 2.49 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Tangential velocity vector of the coolant in the cavity of the inner input rotor at various rotational speeds: (a) ns = 0, (b) ns = 500 rpm, (c) ns = 1000 rpm, and (d) ns = 1500 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Overall velocity vector of the coolant under WC7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Steady-state temperature distribution of MR fluids: (a) in each axial gap at r = 61 mm, (b) MR fluids temperature in the No. 8 gap for the inner and outer layers, and (c) MR fluids temperature versus radius in the No. 8 outer layer gap

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Test bed for the heating tests of the MRC prototype

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Installation of the temperature sensors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Heating test results for the MRC prototype under different conditions: (a) temperature variation of MR fluids, (b) simulation and experimental results of the steady-state MR fluids temperature, and (c) a comparison of the steady-state outlet coolant temperature for simulation and experiment




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In