0
Research Papers: Fundamental Issues and Canonical Flows

Dynamics of Liquid Sheet Breakup in Splash Plate Atomization

[+] Author and Article Information
G. Thunivumani

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,
Mumbai 400076, India
e-mail: thunivumani@gmail.com

Hrishikesh Gadgil

Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,
Mumbai 400076, India

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 13, 2017; final manuscript received August 3, 2017; published online September 20, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Devesh Ranjan.

J. Fluids Eng 140(1), 011205 (Sep 20, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: FE-17-1227; doi: 10.1115/1.4037676 History: Received April 13, 2017; Revised August 03, 2017

An experimental study was conducted to investigate the breakup of a liquid sheet produced by oblique impingement of a liquid jet on a plane solid surface. Experiments are carried out over a wide range of jet Weber number (80–6300) and various jet impingement angles (30 deg, 45 deg, and 60 deg) are employed to study the sheet dynamics. The breakup of a liquid sheet takes place in three modes, closed rim, open rim, and perforated sheet, depending upon the Weber number. The transitions across the modes are also influenced by the impingement angle with the transition Weber number reducing with increase in impingement angle. A modified regime map is proposed to illustrate the role of impingement angle in breakup transitions. A theoretical model based on force balance at the sheet edge is developed to predict the sheet parameters by taking the shear interaction between the sheet and the solid surface into account. The sheet shape predicted by the model fairly matches with the experimentally measured sheet shape. The breakup length and width of the sheet are measured and comparisons with the model predictions show good agreement in closed rim mode of breakup.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bennington, C. , and Kerekes, R. , 1986, “ The Effect of Temperature on Drop Size of Black Liquor Sprays,” J. Pulp Pap. Sci., 12(6), pp. 181–186. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0058907
Inamura, T. , and Tomoda, T. , 2004, “ Characteristic of Spray Through Wall Impinging Nozzles,” Atomization Sprays, 14(4), pp. 375–395. [CrossRef]
Inamura, T. , Yanaoka, H. , and Tomoda, T. , 2004, “ Prediction of Mean Droplet Size of Sprays Issued From Wall Impingement Injector,” AIAA J., 42(3), pp. 614–621. [CrossRef]
Taylor, G. I. , 1960, “ Formation of Thin Flat Sheets of Water,” Proc. R. Soc. London, 259(1296), pp. 1–17. [CrossRef]
Dombrowski, N. , and Hooper, P. C. , 1964, “ A Study of the Sprays Formed by Impinging Jets in Laminar and Turbulent Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 18(3), pp. 392–440. [CrossRef]
Ryan, H. , Anderson, W. , Pal, S. , and Santoro, R. , 1995, “ Atomization Characteristics of Impinging Jets,” J. Propul. Power, 11(1), pp. 135–145. [CrossRef]
Ibrahim, E. A. , and Przekwas, A. J. , 1991, “ Impinging Jets Atomization,” Phys. Fluids A, 3(12), pp. 2981–2987. [CrossRef]
Shen, Y. B. , and Poulikakos, D. , 1998, “ Thickness Variation of a Liquid Sheet Formed by Two Impinging Jets Using Holographic Interferometry,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 120(3), pp. 482–487. [CrossRef]
Bush, W. M. , and Hasha, A. E. , 2004, “ On the Collision of Laminar Jets: Fluid Chains and Fishbones,” J. Fluid Mech., 511, pp. 285–310. [CrossRef]
Lai, W. H. , Huang, T. H. , Jiang, T. L. , and Huang, W. , 2005, “ Effect of Fluid Properties on the Characteristics of Impinging-Jet Sprays,” Atomization Sprays, 15(4), pp. 457–468. [CrossRef]
Li, R. , and Ashgriz, N. , 2006, “ Characteristics of Liquid Sheets Formed by Two Impinging Jets,” Phys. Fluids, 18(8), p. 087104. [CrossRef]
Choo, Y. J. , and Kang, B. S. , 2003, “ A Study on the Velocity Characteristics of the Liquid Elements Produced by Two Impinging Jets,” Exp. Fluids, 34(6), pp. 655–661. [CrossRef]
Yasuda, N. , Yamamura, K. , and Mori, Y. H. , 2010, “ Impingement of Liquid Jets at Atmospheric and Elevated Pressure: An Observational Study Using Paired Water Jets or Water and Methylcyclohexane Jets,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 466(2124), pp. 1–26. [CrossRef]
Inamura, T. , and Shirota, M. , 2014, “ Effect of Velocity Profile of Impinging Jets on Sheet Characteristics Formed by Impingement of Two Round Liquid Jets,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 60, pp. 149–160. [CrossRef]
Spielbauer, T. , and Aidun, C. , 1994, “ The Cause and Effects of Perforations in a Liquid Sheet From a Splash-Plate Spray Nozzle,” Atomization Sprays, 4(4), pp. 405–436. [CrossRef]
Spielbauer, T. , and Aidun, C. , 1994, “ The Wave-Thinning and Breakup of Liquid Sheets,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 116(4), pp. 728–734. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, M. , Amighi, A. , Ashgriz, N. , and Tran, H. N. , 2008, “ Characteristics of Liquid Sheets Formed by Splash Plate Nozzles,” Exp. Fluids, 44(1), pp. 125–136. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, M. , Ashgriz, N. , and Tran, H. N. , 2009, “ Breakup Length and Spreading Angle of Liquid Sheets Formed by Splash Plate Nozzles,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 131(1), p. 011306. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, M. , Ashgriz, N. , and Tran, H. N. , 2009, “ Influence of Breakup Regimes on the Droplet Size Produced by Splash-Plate Nozzles,” AIAA J., 47(3), pp. 516–522. [CrossRef]
Sarchami, A. , Ashgriz, N. , and Tran, H. , 2010, “ An Atomization Model for Splash Plate Nozzles,” AIChE J., 56(4), pp. 849–857.
Karami, A. , 2015, “ Effects of Flashing on Characteristics of Splash Plate Nozzle Sprays,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. http://ilass.org/2/ConferencePapers/ILASS2010-126.PDF
Inamura, T. , 2016, “ Upwash Formation on Splash Plate Atomization,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 85, pp. 67–75. [CrossRef]
Kannaiyan, K. , and Sadr, R. , 2017, “ The Effects of Alumina Nanoparticles as Fuel Additives on the Spray Characteristics of Gas-to-Liquid Jet Fuels,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 87, pp. 93–103. [CrossRef]
Moffat, R. J. , 1988, “ Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 1(1), pp. 3–17. [CrossRef]
Hasson, D. , and Peck, R. E. , 1964, “ Thickness Distribution in a Sheet Formed by Impinging Jets,” AIChE J., 10(5), pp. 752–754. [CrossRef]
Mulmule, A. S. , Tirumkudulu, M. S. , and Ramamurthi, K. , 2010, “ Instability of a Moving Liquid Sheet in the Presence of Acoustic Forcing,” Phys. Fluids, 22(2), p. 022101. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A generalized experimental facility for spray diagnostics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Injector mounting arrangements: (a) splash plate impingement and (b) two-jet impingement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Evolution of liquid sheet structure with increasing jet Weber number at θ = 45 deg: (a) We = 800 (closed rim structure), (b) We = 4050 (open rim), and (c) We = 6300 (perforated sheet)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effect of impingement angle on the modes of sheet breakup at various jet Weber numbers. Rows correspond to constant impingement angle and columns to constant Weber number. (The scale bar shown in the first plate of last row corresponds to 10 mm.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Dependence of transition Weber number on impingement angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

A modified breakup regime map with introduction of impingement angle effect. Various breakup regimes corresponding to each impingement angle are well segregated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of qualitatively equivalent liquid sheets formed in impinging jets and splash plate atomization for θ = 45 deg. (Top row: impinging jets, bottom row: splash plate impingement).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic of jet impingement and sheet formation process: (a) sheet geometry, (b) force balance on the small portion of the sheet, and (c) schematic representation of contact between the sheet and the plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

A binary spray image averaged over 300 instantaneous images. The outline defines the edge of the sheet and the measurements of breakup length and sheet width are shown with white arrows.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the shape of the liquid sheet measured from sheet images and predicted from different models for θ = 45 deg: (a) We = 640 and (b) We = 720

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of predicted sheet breakup length with experimental results. Lines represent the model predictions, which show good agreement in closed rim breakup. Two distinct regimes in variation in breakup length may be clearly noticed.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of predicted sheet width with experimental results. Lines represent the model predictions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparative assessment of proposed model and the data and regime-based model given by Ahmed et al. [18]. Present model shows good agreement in closed sheet regime.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In