Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Flow Mechanism and Characteristics of Pressure-Equalizing Film Along the Surface of a Moving Underwater Vehicle

[+] Author and Article Information
Guihui Ma

School of Energy Science and Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
e-mail: 15B902026@hit.edu.cn

Fu Chen

School of Energy Science and Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
e-mail: chenfu@hit.edu.cn

Jianyang Yu

School of Energy Science and Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
e-mail: yujianyang@hit.edu.cn

Huaping Liu

School of Energy Science and Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
e-mail: lhphgd@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 17, 2017; final manuscript received October 14, 2017; published online December 4, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Praveen Ramaprabhu.

J. Fluids Eng 140(4), 041103 (Dec 04, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: FE-17-1043; doi: 10.1115/1.4038394 History: Received January 17, 2017; Revised October 14, 2017

Pressure-equalizing film is a slice of air layer attached to vehicle exterior with nearly uniform inside pressure, similar to ventilated cavity in composition; it is generated through exhaust process of the inside air chamber as vehicle emerges from deep water, and can reduce the lateral force and pitching moment that vertical launched underwater vehicle suffered. In this work, the emerging process of vehicle from water with pressure-equalizing exhaust was numerically calculated to investigate the evolution and flow characteristics of the generated pressure-equalizing film along its surface. Results indicated that during the whole exhaust process, the film can be obviously classified into different sections according to the distribution of phase volume fraction or pressure. The exhaust velocity ratio and flow rate from vehicle interior chamber were also found to increase as vehicle moves. In the analysis of flow structures, vortex structures such as the horseshoe vortex, “detour-separation” vortex, and counter-rotating vortex pair (CVP) can be figured out in the region of the exhaust hole. Under the effect of re-entrant jet, water around the film tail would be entrained upstream then enter the surface film to mix with the pressure-equalizing air. It leads to the happening of the three-dimensional (3D) wall vortex in the flow field.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wang, Z. Y. , Cheng, S. H. , Yu, H. T. , Wang, G. J. , and Pei, J. L. , 2016, “ Stability Studies of Trajectory of Launched Vehicles Under Deep Water,” Ordnance Ind. Autom., 35(6), pp. 1–5.
Bao, W. C. , Quan, X. B. , and Wei, H. P. , 2014, “ Numerical Simulation on the Flow Dynamics of Underwater Vehicle Launching With Exhaust,” Missiles Space Veh., (5), pp. 14–18.
Qiu, Y. , 2013, “Numerical Simulation Research on the Influence of Cavity Exhaust to the Process of Vehicle Underwater Launch,” M.S. thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, HL.
Savchenko, Y. N. , 2001, “ Modeling the Supercavitation Processes,” Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res., 28(5), pp. 644–659. [CrossRef]
Cao, J. Y. , Lu, C. J. , Li, J. , and Wu, L. , 2006, “ Research on the Vertical Launching of Direct Igniting Underwater Missile,” J. Hydrodyn. (Ser. A), 21(6), pp. 752–759.
Kuklinski, R. T. , Henoch, C. , and Castano, J. , 2001, “ Experimental Study of Ventilated Cavities on Dynamic Test Model,” Fourth International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV), Pasadena, CA, June 20-23, Paper No. 004. http://caltechconf.library.caltech.edu/59/
Zhang, J. H. , Zhang, Y. W. , and Li, Y. T. , 2011, “ Experimental Study of Ventilation Supercavitation Generation and Maintenance Produced by Underwater Vehicle,” J. Exp. Mech., 26(6), pp. 715–720. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYLX201106013.htm
Guo, J. H. , and Lu, C. J. , 2010, “ Pulsation Characteristics of Ventilated Supercavitation on a 2D Hydrofoil,” J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., 15(4), pp. 423–427. [CrossRef]
Zhang, X. S. , and Wang, C. , 2005, “ Research on Underwater Vehicle Based on Multiphase Flow Control,” International Conference on Energy, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering (EMME), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Oct. 15-16, Paper No. 03004, pp. 1–5.
Rabiee, A. , Alishahi, M. M. , Emdad, H. , and Saranjam, B. , 2011, “ PART A: Experimental Investigation of Unsteady Supercavitating Flows,” Iranian J. Sci. Technol., 35(1), pp. 15–29. https://search.proquest.com/openview/236303ff072d657c01fdc9338befea24/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026719
Yi, S. Q. , Zhang, M. H. , Zhou, J. W. , Xu, M. M. , Song, Z. P. , and Shen, J. R. , 2010, “ Experimental Research About the Effects of Attack Angle on Supercavitation of Restrained Model During Axial Accelerating,” Chin. J. Hydrodyn. Ser. A, 25(3), pp. 292–298.
Tang, J. B. , and Zhong, C. W. , 2005, “ Numerical Simulation of the Cavitating, Supercavitaing Flow Based on Navier-Stokes Equations,” Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 37(5), pp. 640–644. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-LXXB200505016.htm
Kawanami, Y. , Kato, H. , Yamaguchi, H. , Tanimura, M. , and Tagaya, Y. , 1997, “ Mechanism and Control of Cloud Cavitation,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 119(4), pp. 788–794. [CrossRef]
Self, M. W. , and Ripken, J. F. , 1995, “Steady-State Cavity Studies in a Free-Jet Water Tunnel,” St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Report No. 47. https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjbk9SYwcLXAhVBQCYKHSqnAbkQFgglMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fconservancy.umn.edu%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F11299%2F108489%2F1%2Fpr047.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0gAw_ukyHLnCk0NYAwS9OE
Laberteaux, K. R. , and Ceccio, S. L. , 1998, “ Flow in the Closure Region of Closed Partial Attached Cavitation,” Third International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France, Apr. 7–10, pp. 197–202. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/131460
Zhang, J. Z. , Zhao, J. , Wei, Y. J. , Wang, C. , and Yu, K. P. , 2012, “ Re-Entrant Jet and Its Effect on the Shape of Ventilated Supercavity,” J. Ship Mech., 26(2), pp. 56–59.
Ausoni, P. , Farhat, M. , Escaler, X. , Egusquiza, E. , and Avellan, F. , 2007, “ Cavitation Influence on Von Kármán Vortex Shedding and Induced Hydrofoil Vibrations,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 129(8), pp. 966–973. [CrossRef]
New, T. H. , Lim, T. T. , and Luo, S. C. , 2003, “ Elliptic Jets Cross-Flow,” J. Fluid Mech., 494, pp. 119–140. [CrossRef]
Barata, J. M. , and Durao, D. F. G. , 2004, “ Laser-Doppler Measurements of Impinging Jet Flows Through a Crossflow,” Exp. Fluids, 36(5), pp. 665–674. [CrossRef]
Sau, A. , Sheu, T. W. H. , Hwang, R. R. , and Yang, W. C. , 2004, “ Three-Dimensional simulation of Square Jets in Cross-Flow,” Phys. Rev. E, 69, p. 066302.
Jiang, G. Q. , Ren, X. W. , and Li, W. , 2010, “ Numerical Simulation of Vorticity Dynamics for Turbulent Jet in Crossflow,” Adv. Water Sci., 21(3), pp. 307–314.
Kelso, K. R. , and Smits, A. J. , 1995, “ Horseshoe Vortex Systems Resulting From the Interaction Between a Laminar Boundary Layer and a Transverse Jet,” Phys. Fluids, 7(1), pp. 153–158. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , 2005, “Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Vortical Structures of an Impinging Jet in Crossflow,” Ph.D. thesis, Shanghai University, Shanghai.
Maurel, S. , and Sollied, C. , 2001, “ A Turbulent Plane Jet Impinging Nearby and Far From a Flat Plate,” Exp. Fluids, 31(6), pp. 687–696. [CrossRef]
Xiang, M. , 2011, “ Numerical Research on Ventilated Cavitating Flow for the Supercavitating Vehicles,” Ph.D. thesis, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, HN.
Qin, Y. , 2014, “Effect of Gas Exhausting on Hydrodynamic Characteristic of Underwater Vehicle Considering Wave,” M.S. thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, HL.
Chen, F. , Ma, G. H. , Bao, W. C. , and Jiang, S. , 2016, “ Effect of Straight or Inclined Hole Exhaust on Flow Around Underwater Vehicle—Part 2: Hydrodynamic Characteristics,” J. Eng. Thermophys., 37(9), pp. 1845–1849.
Sakai, E. , Takahashi, T. , and Watanabe, H. , 2014, “ Large-Eddy Simulation of an Inclined Round Jet Issuing Into a Crossflow,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 69, pp. 300–311. [CrossRef]
Brandner, P. A. , Pearce, B. W. , and Graaf, K. L. D. , 2015, “ Cavitation About a Jet in Crossflow,” J. Fluid Mech., 768, pp. 141–174. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) The emerging process of vehicle under submarine horizontal movement and (b) schematic of pressure-equalizing exhaust and the involved basic flow problems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Geometrical model and computational domain of underwater vehicle as well as the relevant mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The experimental facilities and comparison of results between numerical and experimental data: (a) schematic of vertical gas ejection system of a projectile with horizontal moving ability, (b) comparison of distribution of volume fraction and bubble shape between experiment and simulation, and (c) comparison of displacement between experiment and simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of the pressure coefficient with different grid systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Distribution of phase volume fraction, pressure coefficient, axial velocity coefficient, and streamline: (a) distribution of volume fraction α on the vehicle surface at different T¯ (the marked number), (b) film shape on vehicle surface and symmetry plane at T¯= 2.0, (c) Distribution of p¯, V¯y along the axial line of underwater vehicle at T¯= 0.5, and (d) Distribution of α, p¯, V¯y and streamline on surface of underwater vehicle at T¯= 0.5 (the marked line whose shape is similar to the outline of air film on vehicle surface is the contour line where α = 0.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Distribution of phase volume fraction, pressure coefficient and streamline at T¯=1.0 and 2.0: (a) distribution of p¯, V¯y along the axial line of underwater vehicle, (b) distribution of α,p¯,V¯y, and streamline on surface of underwater vehicle at T¯=1.0 (the marked line whose shape is similar to the outline of air film on vehicle surface is the contour line where α=0.5), and (c) distribution of α, p¯, V¯y and streamline on vehicle surface and symmetry plane at T¯=2.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic of the observation surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Distribution of phase volume fraction, pressure coefficient, and streamline at T¯=1.0 and 2.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Distribution of phase volume fraction α and streamline in the axial sections at exhaust hole

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Distribution of 3D streamline near exhaust hole

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Distribution of phase volume fraction α and streamline in the vicinity of film tail

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The flow pattern on the vehicle surface around the jet orifice

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Temporal variation of pressure ratio, density, flow velocity, axial flow velocity, and flow angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Temporal variation of exhaust flow rate and film length

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Distribution of circumferential pressure standard deviation along axial direction of vehicle



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In