0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Ground Effect on the Vortex Flow and Aerodynamics of a Slender Delta Wing

[+] Author and Article Information
T. Lee

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McGill University,
Montreal, QC H3A OC3, Canada

L. S. Ko

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McGill University,
Montreal, QC H3A OC3, Canada

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 10, 2017; final manuscript received December 30, 2017; published online March 16, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Moran Wang.

J. Fluids Eng 140(7), 071104 (Mar 16, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-17-1576; doi: 10.1115/1.4039232 History: Received September 10, 2017; Revised December 30, 2017

The ground effect on the aerodynamic loading and leading-edge vortex (LEV) flow generated by a slender delta wing was investigated experimentally. Both the lift and drag forces were found to increase with reducing ground distance (up to 50% of the wing chord). The lift increment was also found to be the greatest at low angles of attack α and decreased rapidly with increasing ground distance and α. The ground effect-caused earlier wing stall was also accompanied by a strengthened LEV with an increased rotational speed and size compared to the baseline wing. The smaller the ground distance, the stronger the LEV and the earlier vortex breakdown became. Meanwhile, the vortex trajectory was also found to be located further inboard and above the delta wing in ground effect compared to its baseline-wing counterpart. Finally, for wing-in-ground effect (WIG) craft with delta-wing planform the most effective in-ground-effect flight should be kept within 10% of the wing chord.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Rozhdestvensky, K. V. , 2006, “Wing-in-Ground Effect Vehicles,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 42(3), pp. 211–283. [CrossRef]
von Kocivar, B. , 1977, “Ram-Wing X-114: Floats, Skims, and Flies,” Popular Science, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC, pp. 70–73.
Katz, J. , and Levin, D. , 1984, “Measurements of Ground Effect for Delta Wing,” J. Aircr., 21(6), pp. 441–443. [CrossRef]
Plotkin, A. , and Dobele, S. S. , 1988, “Slender Wing in Ground Effect,” AIAA J., 26(4), pp. 493–494. [CrossRef]
Curry, R. E. , and Owens, L. R. , 2003, “Ground Effect Characteristics of the Tu-144 Supersonic Transport Airplane,” NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Technical Report No. NASA TM-2003-212035. https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88750main_H-2510.pdf
Qin, Y. , Qu, Q. , Liu, P. , Tian, Y. , and Lu, Z. , 2015, “DDES Study of the Aerodynamic Forces and Flow Physics of a Delta Wing in Static Ground Effect,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 43, pp. 423–436. [CrossRef]
Qu, Q. , Lu, Z. , Guo, H. , Liu, P. , and Agarwal, R. K. , 2015, “Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamics of a Delta Wing in Ground Effect,” J. Aircr., 52(1), pp. 329–340. [CrossRef]
Jia, Q. , Yang, W. , and Yang, Z. , 2016, “Numerical Study on Aerodynamics of Banked Wing in Ground Effect,” Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., 8(2), pp. 209–217. [CrossRef]
Nelson, R. C. , and Pelletier, A. , 2003, “The Unsteady Aerodynamics of Slender Wings and Aircraft Undergoing Large Amplitude Maneuvers,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 39(2–3), pp. 185–248. [CrossRef]
Gursul, I. , 2005, “Review of Unsteady Vortex Flows Over Slender Delta Wings,” J. Aircr., 42(2), pp. 299–319. [CrossRef]
Hsiun, C. M. , and Chen, C. K. , 1996, “Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Two-Dimensional Airfoil With Ground Effect,” J. Aircr., 33(2), pp. 386–392. [CrossRef]
Moore, N. , Wilson, P. A. , and Peters, A. J. , 2002, “An Investigation Into Wing in Ground Effect Airfoil Geometry,” RTO-MP-095 SCI Symposium on Challenges in Dynamics, System Identification, Control and Handling Qualities for Land, Air, Sea and Space Vehicles (RTO-MP-095), Berlin, May 13–15, pp. 11–30. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/51083/1/51083.pdf
Ahmed, M. R. , Takasaki, T. , and Kohama, Y. , 2007, “Aerodynamics of a NACA 4412 Airfoil in Ground Effect,” AIAA J., 45(1), pp. 37–47. [CrossRef]
Lee, T. , Majeed, A. , Siddiqui, B. , and Tremblay-Dionne, V. , 2017, “Impact of Ground Proximity on the Aerodynamic Properties of an Unsteady Airfoil,” J. Aerosp. Eng., epub.
Altaf, A. , Omar, A. A. , Asrar, W. , and Jamaluddin, H. B. L. , 2011, “Study of the Reverse Delta Wing,” J. Aircr., 48(1), pp. 277–286. [CrossRef]
Lee, T. , and Ko, L. S. , 2016, “Experimental Study of the Vortex Flow and Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Reverse Delta Wing,” J. Aerosp. Eng., 230(6), pp. 1126–1138.
Lee, T. , 2016, “Impact of Gurney Flaplike Strips on the Aerodynamic and Vortex Flow Characteristics of a Reverse Delta Wing,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 138(6), p. 061104. [CrossRef]
Lee, T. , Ko, L. S. , and Tremblay-Dionne, V. , 2017, “Effect of Anhedral on a Reverse Delta Wing,” J. Aerosp. Eng., epub.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematics of the delta wing model and definition of ground distance h

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Impact of ground effect on the aerodynamic coefficients. ΔCL = (CL,GE − CL,OGE)/CL,OGE. GE and OGE denotes in ground effect and out of the ground effect, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Influence of ground effect on the streamwise evolution of the normalized iso-vorticity contours of the 65 deg-sweep delta wing at α = 20 deg for BW and h/c = 5%, 10%, and 20%. BW denotes baseline wing.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Selected PIV slices with Δ(x/c) = 0.01 increment showing the LEV breakdown location at α = 20 deg: BW—(a) x/c = 0.75, (b) x/c = 0.76, (c) x/c = 0.77 and (d) x/c = 0.78, h/c = 5%—(e) x/c = 0.70, (f) x/c = 0.71, (g) x/c = 0.72 and (h)x/c = 0.73, h/c = 10%—(i) x/c = 0.72, (j) x/c = 0.73, (k) x/c = 0.74 and (l) x/c = 0.75, and h/c = 20%—(m) x/c = 0.72, (n)x/c = 0.73, (o) x/c = 0.74, and (p) x/c = 0.75

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Streamwise variation of LEV flow parameters with h/c at α = 20 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Ground effect on normalize vorticity and tangential velocity distributions across vortex center at selected h/c, α and x/c. ((a) and (b)): h/c = 10% and α = 20 deg. ((c) and (d)): α = 16 deg and x/c = 0.7.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Selected iso-ζc/u contours in ground effect at α = 16 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Impact of ground effect on streamwise evolution of vθ,peak and Γo at α = 16 deg

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In