Research Papers: Techniques and Procedures

A Method of Measuring Turbulent Flow Structures With Particle Image Velocimetry and Incorporating Into Boundary Conditions of Large Eddy Simulations

[+] Author and Article Information
Puxuan Li

Institute for Environmental Research,
Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering
Kansas State University,
Manhattan, KS 66506
e-mail: puxuanli@ksu.edu

Steve J. Eckels

Institute for Environmental Research,
Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering
Kansas State University,
Manhattan, KS 66506
e-mail: eckels@ksu.edu

Garrett W. Mann

Institute for Environmental Research,
Mechanical and Nuclear
Engineering Department,
Kansas State University,
Manhattan, KS 66506
e-mail: gmann@ksu.edu

Ning Zhang

Department of Chemical, Civil
and Mechanical Engineering,
McNeese State University,
Lake Charles, LA 70609
e-mail: nzhang@mcneese.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 23, 2017; final manuscript received November 22, 2017; published online March 16, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Daniel Livescu.

J. Fluids Eng 140(7), 071401 (Mar 16, 2018) (11 pages) Paper No: FE-17-1051; doi: 10.1115/1.4039256 History: Received January 23, 2017; Revised November 22, 2017

The setup of inlet conditions for a large eddy simulation (LES) is a complex and important problem. Normally, there are two methods to generate the inlet conditions for LES, i.e., synthesized turbulence methods and precursor simulation methods. This study presents a new method for determining inlet boundary conditions of LES using particle image velocimetry (PIV). LES shows sensitivity to inlet boundary conditions in the developing region, and this effect can even extend into the fully developed region of the flow. Two kinds of boundary conditions generated from PIV data, i.e., steady spatial distributed inlet (SSDI) and unsteady spatial distributed inlet (USDI), are studied. PIV provides valuable field measurement, but special care is needed to estimate turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent dissipation rate for SSDI. Correlation coefficients are used to analyze the autocorrelation of the PIV data. Different boundary conditions have different influences on LES, and their advantages and disadvantages for turbulence prediction and static pressure prediction are discussed in the paper. Two kinds of LES with different subgrid turbulence models are evaluated: namely dynamic Smagorinsky–Lilly model (Lilly model) and wall modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES model). The performances of these models for flow prediction in a square duct are presented. Furthermore, the LES results are compared with PIV measurement results and Reynolds-stress model (RSM) results at a downstream location for validation.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Tabor, G. R. , and Baba-Ahmadi, M. H. , 2010, “Inlet Conditions for Large Eddy Simulation: A Review,” Comput. Fluids, 39(4), pp. 553–567. [CrossRef]
Aider, J. L. , and Danet, A. , 2006, “Large-Eddy Simulation Study of Upstream Boundary Conditions Influence Upon a Backward-Facing Step Flow,” C. R. Méc., 334(7), pp. 447–453. [CrossRef]
Mathey, F. , Cokljat, D. , Bertoglio, J. P. , and Sergent, E. , 2006, “Assessment of the Vortex Method for Large Eddy Simulation Inlet Conditions,” Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 6(1/2/3), pp. 58–67. [CrossRef]
Lee, S. , Lele, S. K. , and Moin, P. , 1992, “Simulation of Spatially Evolving Turbulence and the Applicability of Taylor's Hypothesis in Compressible Flow,” Phys. Fluids A, 4(7), pp. 1521–1530. [CrossRef]
Di Mare, L. , Klein, M. , Jones, W. P. , and Janicka, J. , 2006, “Synthetic Turbulence Inflow Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation,” Phys. Fluids, 18(2), p. 025107. [CrossRef]
Lund, T. S. , Wu, X. , and Squires, K. D. , 1998, “Generation of Turbulent Inflow Data for Spatially-Developing Boundary Layer Simulations,” J. Comput. Phys., 140(2), pp. 233–258. [CrossRef]
Spalart, P. R. , 1986, “Numerical Study of Sink-Flow Boundary Layers,” J. Fluid Mech., 172(1), pp. 307–328. [CrossRef]
Pierce, C. D. , and Moin, P. , 1998, “Method for Generating Equilibrium Swirling Inflow Conditions,” AIAA J., 36(7), pp. 1325–1327. [CrossRef]
Sbrizzai, F. , Verzicco, R. , and Soldati, A. , 2009, “Turbulent Flow and Dispersion of Inertial Particles in a Confined Jet Issued by a Long Cylindrical Pipe,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 82(1), pp. 1–23. [CrossRef]
Schlüter, J. U. , Pitsch, H. , and Moin, P. , 2004, “Large-Eddy Simulation Inflow Conditions for Coupling With Reynolds-Averaged Flow Solvers,” AIAA J., 42(3), pp. 478–484. [CrossRef]
Drikakis, D. , 2003, “Advances in Turbulent Flow Computations Using High-Resolution Methods,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 39(6–7), pp. 405–424. [CrossRef]
Baba-Ahmadi, M. H. , and Tabor, G. , 2009, “Inlet Conditions for LES Using Mapping and Feedback Control,” Comput. Fluids, 38(6), pp. 1299–1311. [CrossRef]
Ragni, D. , Van Oudheusden, B. W. , and Scarano, F. , 2012, “3D Pressure Imaging of an Aircraft Propeller Blade-Tip Flow by Phase-Locked Stereoscopic PIV,” Exp. Fluids, 52(2), pp. 463–477. [CrossRef]
Roloff, C. , Bordás, R. , Nickl, R. , Mátrai, Z. , Szaszák, N. , Szilárd, S. , and Thévenin, D. , 2013, “Investigation of the Velocity Field in a Full-Scale Model of a Cerebral Aneurysm,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 43, pp. 212–219. [CrossRef]
Cao, G. , Sivukari, M. , Kurnitski, J. , Ruponen, M. , and Seppänen, O. , 2010, “Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) Application in the Measurement of Indoor Air Distribution by an Active Chilled Beam,” Build. Environ., 45(9), pp. 1932–1940. [CrossRef]
Yoon, S. Y. , Ross, J. W. , Mench, M. M. , and Sharp, K. V. , 2006, “Gas-Phase Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) for Application to the Design of Fuel Cell Reactant Flow Channels,” J. Power Sources, 160(2), pp. 1017–1025. [CrossRef]
Bellofiore, A. , Donohue, E. M. , and Quinlan, N. J. , 2011, “Scale-Up of an Unsteady Flow Field for Enhanced Spatial and Temporal Resolution of PIV Measurements: Application to Leaflet Wake Flow in a Mechanical Heart Valve,” Exp. Fluids, 51(1), pp. 161–176. [CrossRef]
Li, P. , Eckels, S. J. , Mann, G. W. , and Zhang, N. , 2014, “Experimental Measurements in Near-Wall Regions by Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV),” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2014-21918.
Sharp, K. V. , Kim, K. C. , and Adrian, R. , 2000, “Dissipation Estimation Around a Rushton Turbine Using Particle Image Velocimetry,” Laser Techniques Applied to Fluid Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, pp. 337–354. [CrossRef]
Saarenrinne, P. , and Piirto, M. , 2000, “Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate Estimation From PIV Velocity Vector Fields,” Exp. Fluids, 29(7), pp. S300–S307. [CrossRef]
Maruyama, Y. , Tamura, T. , Okuda, Y. , and Ohashi, M. , 2012, “LES of Turbulent Boundary Layer for Inflow Generation Using Stereo PIV Measurement Data,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 104–106, pp. 379–388. https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0167610512000700/1-s2.0-S0167610512000700-main.pdf?_tid=fee78d7a-1369-11e8-887a-00000aacb362&acdnat=1518820840_d1d2f8d952e00693fb3094f6008aeb7d
Li, P. , Eckels, S. J. , Zhang, N. , and Mann, G. W. , 2016, “Effects of Parallel Processing on Large Eddy Simulations in ANSYS Fluent,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2016-7884.
Germano, M. , Piomelli, U. , Moin, P. , and Cabot, W. H. , 1991, “A Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Eddy Viscosity Model,” Phys. Fluids A, 3(7), pp. 1760–1765. [CrossRef]
Shur, M. L. , Spalart, P. R. , Strelets, M. K. , and Travin, A. K. , 2008, “A Hybrid RANS-LES Approach With Delayed-DES and Wall-Modelled LES Capabilities,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29(6), pp. 1638–1649. [CrossRef]
Meinhart, C. D. , Wereley, S. T. , and Gray, M. H. B. , 2000, “Volume Illumination for Two-Dimensional Particle Image Velocimetry,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 11(6), p. 809. [CrossRef]
TSI, 2014, “Insight 4G Software Manual, Revision B,” TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN.
Westerweel, J. , and Scarano, F. , 2005, “Universal Outlier Detection for PIV Data,” Exp. Fluids, 39(6), pp. 1096–1100. [CrossRef]
Pope, S. B. , 2001, Turbulence Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Xu, D. , and Chen, J. , 2013, “Accurate Estimate of Turbulent Dissipation Rate Using PIV Data,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 44, pp. 662–672. [CrossRef]
Sreenivasan, K. R. , 1995, “On the Universality of the Kolmogorov Constant,” Phys. Fluids, 7(11), pp. 2778–2784. [CrossRef]
Edwards, A. L. , 1976, An Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
ANSYS, 2013, “ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 15.0,” ANSYS Inc., Pittsburgh, PA.
Pedlosky, J. , 2013, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
Batchelor, G. K. , 1967, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Speziale, C. G. , Sarkar, S. , and Gatski, T. B. , 1991, “Modelling the Pressure-Strain Correlation of Turbulence: An Invariant Dynamical Systems Approach,” J. Fluid Mech., 227(1), pp. 245–272. [CrossRef]
VSJ, 2011, “ITTC–Recommended Procedures and Guidelines—Uncertainty Analysis for Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV),” The Visualization Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Courant, R. , Friedrichs, K. , and Lewy, H. , 1967, “On the Partial Difference Equations of Mathematical Physics,” IBM J. Res. Dev., 11(2), pp. 215–234. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic for water flow loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic for experimental test section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

PIV instrumentations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

PIV image with vector field

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Geometry with meshes: (a) whole domain, (b) zoom-in view at inlet for RSM, and (c)zoom-in view at inlet for LES

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Boundary conditions for case 2 with PIV measurement data: (a) velocity magnitude, (b) turbulent kinetic energy, and (c)turbulent dissipation rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Grid-independence study for RSM with SSDI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Experimental results and numerical results with SSDI on line 1: (a) velocity profiles for case 1, (b) turbulent kinetic energy for case 1, (c) velocity profiles for case 2, and (d) turbulent kinetic energy for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contours for the RSM results in cross sections: (a) velocity magnitude, (b) turbulent kinetic energy, and (c) turbulent dissipation rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time histories of static pressure simulated by WMLES model with SSDI at point 1 for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experimental results and numerical results with USDI on line 1: (a) velocity profiles for case 1, (b) turbulent kinetic energy for case 1, (c) velocity profiles for case 2, and (d) turbulent kinetic energy for case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Time histories of static pressure simulated by the two LES at point 1 with USDI for case 2



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In