Research Papers: Multiphase Flows

Particle Resuspension in a Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flow

[+] Author and Article Information
S. C. Fu

e-mail: mescfu@ust.hk

C. Y. H. Chao, W. T. Leung

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,
Clear Water Bay,
Hong Kong, 852, PRC

R. M. C. So

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Hung Hom, Hong Kong, 852, PRC

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received November 4, 2012; final manuscript received February 1, 2013; published online March 26, 2013. Assoc. Editor: John Abraham.

J. Fluids Eng 135(4), 041301 (Mar 26, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: FE-12-1553; doi: 10.1115/1.4023660 History: Received November 04, 2012; Revised February 01, 2013

Resuspension is of common occurrence in a wide range of industrial and environmental processes. Excessive resuspension in these processes could have a severe impact on human safety and health. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a practical, yet reasonably accurate model to describe the resuspension phenomenon. It has been identified that rolling is the dominant mechanism for particle resuspension in the presence of an air stream, be it laminar or turbulent. Existing models predict the resuspension rate by regarding particles as being resuspended once they are set in motion; only a few of these models attempt to describe the full scenario, including rolling motion and the effect of turbulence. The objective of this paper is to propose a stochastic model to simulate the resuspension rate in the presence of a near-wall turbulent stream, and where the rolling mechanism is assumed to dominate the resuspension process. The fluctuating part of the angular velocity of a rolling particle is modeled by the Langevin equation (i.e., an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process); thus, the overall angular velocity is modeled as a diffusion process. A free parameter of the proposed resuspension model is determined using data obtained from a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of the problem. Once determined, the parameter is found to be universal for different materials and different sizes of particles tested. The modeling results obtained using this parameter are found to be in good agreement with experimental data, and the model performs better compared to other models.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Sehmel, G. A., 1980, “Particle Resuspension: A Review,” Environ. Int., 4(2), pp. 107–127. [CrossRef]
Nicholson, K. W., 1988, “A Review of Particle Resuspension,” Atmos. Environ., 22, pp. 2639–2651. [CrossRef]
Ziskind, G., 2006, “Particle Resuspension From Surfaces: Revisited and Re-Evaluated,” Rev. Chem. Eng., 22(1–2), pp. 1–123. [CrossRef]
Qian, J., and Ferro, A. R., 2008, “Resuspension of Dust Particles in a Chamber and Associated Environmental Factors,” Aerosol Sci. Technol., 42, pp. 566–578. [CrossRef]
Zhang, X., Ahmadi, G., Qian, J., and Ferro, A. R., 2008, “Particle Detachment, Resuspension and Transport Due to Human Walking in Indoor Environments,” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 22, pp. 591–621. [CrossRef]
Kubota, Y., Hall, J. W., and Higuchi, H., 2009, “An Experimental Investigation of the Flow Field and Dust Resuspension Due to Idealized Human Walking,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 131(8), p. 081104. [CrossRef]
Yang, Y., Sze-To, G. N., and Chao, C. Y. H., 2012, “Estimation of the Aerodynamic Sizes of Single Bacterium-Laden Expiratory Aerosols Using Stochastic Modeling With Experimental Validation,” Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46(1), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Ziskind, G., Fichman, M., and Gutfinger, C., 1995, “Resuspension of Particulate From Surfaces to Turbulent Flows – Review and Analysis,” J. Aerosol Sci., 26(4), pp. 613–644. [CrossRef]
Cleaver, J., and Yates, B., 1973, “Mechanism of Detachment of Colloidal Particles From a Flat Substrate in a Turbulent Flow,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 44(3), pp. 464–474. [CrossRef]
Wen, H. Y., and Kasper, G., 1989, “On the Kinetics of Particle Reentrainment From Surfaces,” J. Aerosol Sci., 20, pp. 483–498. [CrossRef]
Reeks, M. W., and Hall, D., 2001, “Kinetic Models for Particle Resuspension in Turbulent Flows: Theory and Measurement,” J. Aerosol Sci., 32, pp. 1–31. [CrossRef]
Reeks, M. W., Reed, J. R., and Hall, D., 1988, “The Resuspension of Small Particles by a Turbulent Flow,” J. Phys. D, 21, pp. 574–589. [CrossRef]
Reeks, M. W., and Hall, D., 1988, “Deposition and Resuspension of Gas-Borne Particles in Recirculating Turbulent Flows,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 110(2), pp. 165–171. [CrossRef]
Ziskind, G., Fichman, M., and Gutfinger, C., 2000, “Particle Behavior on Surfaces Subjected to External Excitations,” J. Aerosol Sci., 31(6), pp. 703–719. [CrossRef]
Ibrahim, A. H., Dunn, P. F., and Brach, R. M., 2003, “Microparticle Detachment From Surfaces Exposed to Turbulent Air Flow: Controlled Experiments and Modeling,” J. Aerosol Sci., 34, pp. 765–782. [CrossRef]
Guingo, M., and Minier, J.-P., 2008, “A New Model for the Simulation of Particle Resuspension by Turbulent Flows Based on a Stochastic Description of Wall Roughness and Adhesion Forces,” J. Aerosol Sci., 39, pp. 957–973. [CrossRef]
Pope, S. B., 2000, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, Chap. 7,8,12.
Lai, Y. G., and So, R. M. C., 1990, “On Near-Wall Turbulent Flow Modeling,” J. Fluid Mech., 221, pp. 641–673. [CrossRef]
Hinds, W. C., 1999, Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, Chap. 4.
Minier, J. P., and Peirano, E., 2001, “The PDF Approach to Turbulent Polydispersed Two-Phase Flows,” Phys. Rep., 352, pp. 1–214. [CrossRef]
Gardiner, C. W., 2004, Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences, 3rd ed., Springer, Berlin, Chap. 3.
Lai, A. C. K., Byrne, M. A., and Goddard, A. J. H., 1998, “Aerosol Deposition in Turbulent Channel Flow—Implications for Indoor Air Quality Control,” J. Aerosol Sci., 29(1–2), p. 231. [CrossRef]
Lai, A. C. K., Byrne, M. A., and Goddard, A. J. H., 2001, “Aerosol Deposition in Turbulent Channel Flow on a Regular Array of Three-Dimensional Roughness Elements,” J. Aerosol Sci., 32(1), pp. 121–137. [CrossRef]
Wang, M., Lin, C.-H., and Chen, Q., 2011, “Determination of Particle Deposition in Enclosed Spaces by Detached Eddy Simulation With the Lagrangian Method,” Atmos. Environ., 30, pp. 5376–5384. [CrossRef]
Kim, J., Moin, P., and Moser, R. D., 1987, “Turbulence Statistics in Fully Developed Channel Flow at Low Reynolds Number,” J. Fluid Mech., 177, pp. 133–186. [CrossRef]
So, R. M. C., Lai, Y. G., Zhang, H. S., and Hwang, B. C., 1991, “Second-Order Near Wall Turbulence Closures: A Review,” AIAA J., 29(11), pp. 1819–1835. [CrossRef]
So, R. M. C., Aksoy, H., Yuan, S. P., and Sommer, T. P., 1996, “Modeling Reynolds-Number Effects in Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 118(2), pp. 260–267. [CrossRef]
O'Neill, M., 1968, “A Sphere in Contact With a Plane in a Slow Shear Linear Flow,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 23, pp. 1293–1298. [CrossRef]
Maude, A., 1963, “The Movement of a Sphere in Front of a Plane at Low Reynolds Number,” Br. J. Appl. Phys., 14, pp. 894–898. [CrossRef]
Mollinger, A. M., and Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., 1996, “Measurement of the Lift Force on a Particle Fixed to the Wall in the Viscous Sublayer of a Fully Developed Turbulent Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 316, pp. 285–306. [CrossRef]
Zhou, H., Götzinger, M., and Peukert, W., 2003, “The Influence of Particle Charge and Roughness on Particle-Substrate Adhesion,” Powder Technol., 135–136, pp. 82–91. [CrossRef]
Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K., and Roberts, A. D., 1971, “Surface Energy and the Contact of Elastic Solids,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 324, pp. 301–313. [CrossRef]
Reed, J. R., and Rochowiak, P., 1988, “The Adhesion of Small Particles to a Surface,” Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Aerosol Society, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Algorithm of the MC simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of resuspension measurements (×) of Ref. [11] with model calculations for nominal 10 μm alumina spheres

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of resuspension measurements (×) of Ref. [11] with model calculations for nominal 20 μm alumina spheres

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of resuspension measurements (×) of Ref. [11] with model calculations for nominal 10 μm graphite spheres

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Friction velocity to obtain 50% fraction remaining plotted against different Δt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of the resuspension rates with the long time 1/t decay

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Probability of a single 10 μm alumina particle approaching resuspension

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Probability of a single 10 μm alumina rolling particle approaching rest again



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In