Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

In Situ PLIF and Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements of the Primary Entrainment Fuel Jet in a Naturally Aspirated Water Heater

[+] Author and Article Information
Jon D. Koch

e-mail: jondkoch@gmail.com
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
1515 West Wisconsin Avenue,
Marquette University,
Milwaukee, WI 53233

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 24, 2012; final manuscript received August 6, 2013; published online December 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Peter Vorobieff.

J. Fluids Eng 136(2), 021104 (Dec 18, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: FE-12-1471; doi: 10.1115/1.4025865 History: Received September 24, 2012; Revised August 06, 2013

The time-averaged characteristics of a fuel jet have been measured via acetone planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) in the primary mixing region of an operating gas-fired water heater. These measurements allow for experimental characterization of the cross-sectional scalar and velocity fields as well as the estimation of the mass entrainment as the flow enters the burner in a practical system. In these experiments, reasonable results were obtained when only the fuel jet was seeded with acetone or PIV particles rather than the entire flow, thus demonstrating the potential for simplified experimental configurations in some applications where controlling or seeding the entire flow may be difficult. The entrainment characteristics of the fuel jet are compared with benchmarks from literature. The commercial device exhibits a larger mass entrainment rate than is found in typical free jets that have been studied in the literature. This may be a result of the jet's low Reynolds number (9,600) in comparison with other literature studies, and a result of initial conditions.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Berry, C., 2009, “Residential Energy Consumption Survey 2009,” http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2009/
Dowling, D. R., and Dimotakis, P. E., 1990, “Similarity of the Concentration Field of Gas-Phase Turbulent Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 218, pp. 109–141. [CrossRef]
Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N., 2007, Transport Phenomena, Wiley, New York.
Mi, J., Nobes, D. S., and Nathan, G. J., 2001, “Influence of Jet Exit Conditions on the Passive Scalar Field of an Axisymmetric Free Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 432, pp. 91–125.
Wang, H., and Wing-Keung Law, A., 2002, “Second-Order Integral Model for a Round Turbulent Buoyant Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 459, pp. 397–428. [CrossRef]
Law, A., 2006, “Velocity and Concentration Distributions of Round and Plane Turbulent Jets,” J. Eng. Math., 56(1), pp. 69–78. [CrossRef]
Zarruk, G., and Cowen, E., 2008, “Simultaneous Velocity and Passive Scalar Concentration Measurements in Low Reynolds Number Neutrally Buoyant Turbulent Round Jets,” Exp. Fluids, 44(6), pp. 865–872. [CrossRef]
Nathan, G. J., Mi, J., Alwahabi, Z. T., Newbold, G. J. R., and Nobes, D. S., 2006, “Impacts of a Jet's Exit Flow Pattern on Mixing and Combustion Performance,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 32(5–6), pp. 496–538. [CrossRef]
Papadopoulos, G., and Pitts, W. M., 1999, “A Generic Centerline Velocity Decay Curve for Initially Turbulent Axisymmetric Jets,” ASME J. Fluid. Eng., 121(1), pp. 80–85. [CrossRef]
Pitts, W. M., 1991, “Effects of Global Density Ratio on the Centerline Mixing Behavior of Axisymmetric Turbulent Jets,” Exp. Fluids, 11(2), pp. 125–134.
Han, D., and Mungal, M. G., 2001, “Direct Measurement of Entrainment in Reacting/Nonreacting Turbulent Jets,” Combust. Flame, 124(3), pp. 370–386. [CrossRef]
Hill, B. J., 1972, “Measurement of Local Entrainment Rate in the Initial Region of Axisymmetric Turbulent Air Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 51(04), pp. 773–779. [CrossRef]
Mi, J., Kalt, P., Nathan, G., and Wong, C., 2007, “PIV Measurements of a Turbulent Jet Issuing from Round Sharp-edged Plate,” Exp. Fluids, 42, pp. 625–637. [CrossRef]
Abdel-Rahman, A. A., Chakroun, W., and Al-Fahed, S. F., 1997, “LDA Measurements in the Turbulent Round Jet,” Mech. Res. Commun., 24(3), pp. 277–288. [CrossRef]
Singh, G., Sundararajan, T., and Bhaskaran, K. A., 2003, “Mixing and Entrainment Characteristics of Circular and Noncircular Confined Jets,” ASME J. Fluid. Eng., 125(5), pp. 835–842. [CrossRef]
Dahm, W. J. A., and Dimotakis, P. E., 1987, “Measurements of Entrainment and Mixing in Turbulent Jets,” AIAA J., 25, pp. 1216–1223. [CrossRef]
Ricou, F. P., and Spalding, D. B., 1961, “Measurements of Entrainment by Axisymmetrical Turbulent Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 11(01), pp. 21–32. [CrossRef]
Chen, C. J., and Rodi, W., 1980, Vertical Turbulent Buoyant Jets: A Review of Experimental Data, Pergamon, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cross section of fuel nozzle. The nozzle is cost effective to manufacture, but it is not similar to common nozzles used in the study of free jets, namely straight pipe, sharp orifice, or smoothly contracting nozzles.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

PLIF and PIV experimental configuration. Particle loading (0.01 cc/min) and acetone tracer concentration (5% by volume) is controlled via a branched methane flow with a total mass flow rate of 21.4 SLPM, corresponding to a 40,000 Btu/h (11.7 kW) firing rate.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Photo of 40k Btu/h pancake burner in water heater. The burner is 120 mm diameter and 55 mm overall height. This study focuses on the turbulent jet created by the fuel nozzle that entrains primary air before the mixture enters the bottom of the pancake.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relative Sum Squared Difference of scaled, average, radial concentration, and velocity profiles. The profile at each axial location is normalized by its centerline value and half-width. The SSD is calculated relative to the profiles at about 9 orifice diameters downstream (where SSD is zero). When the SSD for a property approaches a fairly constant, low value, that property of the jet has become self-similar. The data from the self-similar region can then be fit to Eqs. (2) and (3).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Measurement of entrainment by a turbulent jet with a straight pipe exit with comparison to the work of Han and Mungal [11], which had a similar configuration. Axial distance is normalized by the effective momentum diameter. The data reduction technique used in this work shows good agreement with work that used a seeded coflow.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fuel and air flow rate along jet axis, normalized by orifice diameters. The metered line indicates the fuel flow rate as controlled by the mass flow controllers. The fuel flow deduced from the PLIF and PIV measurements agrees well with the metered rate, providing confidence in the accuracy of the technique.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relative mass entrainment of the water heater jet and comparison with measurements of jets with other initial conditions



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In