Technical Brief

On the Computational Modeling of Unfluidized and Fluidized Bed Dynamics

[+] Author and Article Information
Lindsey C. Teaters

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061

Francine Battaglia

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: fbattaglia@vt.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 3, 2013; final manuscript received April 10, 2014; published online July 24, 2014. Assoc. Editor: D. Keith Walters.

J. Fluids Eng 136(10), 104501 (Jul 24, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: FE-13-1071; doi: 10.1115/1.4027437 History: Received February 03, 2013; Revised April 10, 2014

Two factors of great importance when considering gas–solid fluidized bed dynamics are pressure drop and void fraction, which is the volume fraction of the gas phase. It is, of course, possible to obtain pressure drop and void fraction data through experiments, but this tends to be costly and time consuming. It is much preferable to be able to efficiently computationally model fluidized bed dynamics. In the present work, ANSYS Fluent® is used to simulate fluidized bed dynamics using an Eulerian–Eulerian multiphase flow model. By comparing the simulations using Fluent to experimental data as well as to data from other fluidized bed codes such as Multiphase Flow with Interphase eXchanges (MFIX), it is possible to show the strengths and limitations with respect to multiphase flow modeling. The simulations described herein will present modeling beds in the unfluidized regime, where the inlet gas velocity is less than the minimum fluidization velocity, and will deem to shed some light on the discrepancies between experimental data and simulations. In addition, this paper will also include comparisons between experiments and simulations in the fluidized regime using void fraction.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kunii, D., and Levenspiel, O., 1991, Fluidization Engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA.
Demirbas, A., and Arin, G., 2002, “An Overview of Biomass Pyrolysis,” Energy Sources, 24(5), pp. 471–482. [CrossRef]
Cui, H., and Grace, J. R., 2007, “Fluidization of Biomass Particles: A Review of Experimental Multiphase Flow Aspects,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(1–2), pp. 45–55. [CrossRef]
Papadikis, K., Bridgewater, A., and Gub, S., 2008, “CFD Modeling of the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass in Fluidized Bed Reactors, Part A: Eulerian Computation of Momentum Transport in Bubbling Fluidized Beds,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 63(16), pp. 4218–4227. [CrossRef]
Gidaspow, D., 1994, Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions, Academic, Boston, MA.
Deza, M., 2012, “Modeling the Hydrodynamics of a Biomass Fluidized Bed,” Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Benyahia, S., Arastoopour, H., Knowlton, T. M., and Massah, H., 2000, “Simulation of Particles and Gas Flow Behavior in the Riser Section of a Circulating Fluidized Bed Using the Kinetic Theory Approach for the Particulate Phase,” Powder Technol., 112(1–2), pp. 24–33. [CrossRef]
Taghipour, F., Ellis, N., and Wong, C., 2005, “Experimental and Computational Study of Gas–Solid Fluidized Bed Hydrodynamics,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(24), pp. 6857–6867. [CrossRef]
Sahoo, A., Ramesh, C., and Biswal, K. C., 2009, “Experimental and Computational Study of the Bed Dynamics of Semi-Cylindrical Gas–Solid Fluidized Bed,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 87(1), pp. 11–18. [CrossRef]
Herzog, N., Schreiber, M., Egbers, C., and Krautz, H. J., 2012, “A Comparative Study of Different CFD-Codes for Numerical Simulation of Gas–Solid Fluidized Bed Hydrodynamics,” Comput. Chem. Eng., 39, pp. 41–46. [CrossRef]
Ergun, S., 1952, “Fluid Flow Through Packed Columns,” Chem. Eng. Progress, 48(2), pp. 89–94.
Gera, D., and Gautum, M., 1995, “Analysis of Throughflow Velocity in Two-Dimensional Fluidized Bed Bubbles,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 117(2), pp. 319–322. [CrossRef]
Delebarre, A., 2002, “Does the Minimum Fluidization Velocity Exist?” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124(9), pp. 595–600. [CrossRef]
ANSYS, Inc., 2009, Release 12.0 FLUENT Theory Guide.
Deza, M., Franka, N. P., Heindel, T. J., and Battaglia, F., 2009, “CFD Modeling and X-ray Imaging of Biomass in a Fluidized Bed,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 131(11), p. 111303. [CrossRef]
Kanholy, S. K., Chodak, J., Lattimer, B. Y., and Battaglia, F., 2012, “Modeling and Predicting Gas–Solid Fluidized Bed Dynamics to Capture Nonuniform Inlet Conditions,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(11), p. 111303. [CrossRef]
Lun, C. K. K., Savage, S. B., and Jeffrey, D. J., 1984, “Kinetic Theories for Granular Flow—Inelastic Particles in Coutte-Flow and Slightly Inelastic Particles in a General Flowfield,” J. Fluid Mech., 140, pp. 223–256. [CrossRef]
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, Washington, DC.
Leonard, B. P., 1979, “A Stable and Accurate Convective Modeling Procedure Based on Quadratic Upstream Interpolation,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 19, pp. 59–98. [CrossRef]
Gavi, E., Heindel, T. J., and Fox, R. O., 2010, “Modeling Fluidization in Biomass Gasification Processes,” 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, ICMF 2010, Tampa, FL, May 30–June 4, Paper No. 1956.
Franka, N. P., and Heindel, T. J., 2009, “Local Time-Averaged Gas Holdup in a Fluidized Bed With Side Air Injection Using X-Ray Computed Tomography,” Powder Technol., 193(1), pp. 69–78. [CrossRef]
Battaglia, F., England, J. A., Kanholy, S., and Deza, M., 2010, “On the Modeling of Gas–Solid Fluidization: Which Physics Are Most Important to Capture?,” Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2010-40213, Vol. 7: Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer and Thermal Systems, Parts A and B, pp. 1111–1120.
Teaters, L., 2012, “A Computational Study of the Hydrodynamics of Gas–Solid Fluidized Beds,” M.S. thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Johnson, P. C., and Jackson, R., 1987, “Frictional-Collisional Constitutive Relations for Granular Materials, With Application to Plane Shearing,” J. Fluid Mech., 176, pp. 67–93. [CrossRef]
Schaeffer, D. G., 1987, “Instability in the Evolution Equations Describing Incompressible Granular Flow,” J. Differ. Eq., 66(1), pp. 19–50. [CrossRef]
Syamlal, M., and O'Brien, T. J., 1989, “Computer Simulation of Bubbles in a Fluidized Bed,” Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser., 85, pp. 22–31.
Strasser, W., 2010, “CFD Study of an Evaporative Trickle Bed Reactor: Mal-Distribution and Thermal Runaway Induced by Feed Disturbances,” Chem. Eng. J., 161(1–2), pp. 257–268. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Relationship between pressure drop and inlet gas velocity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the fluidized bed domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Time- and plane-averaged void fraction versus height normalized with bed height comparing experiments [20] with simulations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Time-averaged void fraction profiles comparing walnut shell bed simulations with experimental data [20] at (a) h/h0 = 0.25, (b) h/h0 = 0.5, (c) h/h0 = 0.75, and (d) h/h0 = 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Pressure drop versus inlet gas velocity comparing experiments [20] with modeling approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pressure drop versus inlet gas velocity using the MOD approach for the parametric study and compare with experiments [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pressure drop versus inlet gas velocity using the porous media model as compared with experiments [20] and MFIX [22]



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In