Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

An Experimental Study of the Flow Field Inside the Diffuser Passage of a Laboratory Centrifugal Pump

[+] Author and Article Information
Qiaorui Si

National Research Center of Pumps,
Jiangsu University,
Zhenjiang City 212013, China
e-mail: siqiaorui@gmail.com

Patrick Dupont

Ecole Centrale de Lille,
Lille 59046, France
e-mail: Patrick.Dupont@ec-lille.fr

Annie-Claude Bayeul-Lainé

Arts et Métiers Paristech,
Lille 59046, France
e-mail: annie-claude.bayeul@lille.ensam.fr

Antoine Dazin

Arts et Métiers Paristech,
Lille 59046, France
e-mail: antoine.dazin@lille.ensam.fr

Olivier Roussette

Arts et Métiers Paristech,
Lille 59046, France
e-mail: Olivier.Roussette@ensam.EU

Shouqi Yuan

National Research Center of Pumps,
Jiangsu University,
Zhenjiang City 212013, China
e-mail: shouqiy@ujs.edu.cn

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received June 20, 2014; final manuscript received January 22, 2015; published online March 13, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Bart van Esch.

J. Fluids Eng 137(6), 061105 (Jun 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: FE-14-1322; doi: 10.1115/1.4029671 History: Received June 20, 2014; Revised January 22, 2015; Online March 13, 2015

Measurements are processed on a centrifugal pump model, which works with air and performs with the vane-island type diffuser of a real hydraulic pump, under five flow rates to investigate the internal flow characteristics and their influence on overall pump performance. The mean flow characteristics inside the diffuser are determined by using a miniature three-hole probe connected to an online data acquisition system. The flow structure at the inlet section of the diffuser is analyzed in detail, with a focus on the local pressure loss inside the vaneless gap and incidence angle distributions along the hub-to-shroud direction of the diffuser. Some existing calculations, including leakage effects, are used to evaluate the pressure recovery downstream of the impeller. Furthermore, particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurement results are obtained to help analyze the flow characteristics inside the vane-island diffuser. Each PIV measuring plane is related to one particular diffuser blade-to-blade channel and is analyzed by using the time-averaged method according to seven different relative positions of the impeller. Measurement results show that main loss is produced inside the vaneless part of the diffuser at low flow rates, which might have been caused by the strong rotor–stator interaction. When the impeller flow rate is greater than the diffuser design flow rate, a large fluctuating separated region occurs after the throat of the diffuser on the pressure side. Mean loss originates from the unsteady pressure downstream of the diffuser throat. For better characterization of the separations observed in previous experimental studies, complementary unsteady static pressure measurement campaigns have been conducted on the diffuser blade wall. The unsteadiness revealed by these measurements, as well as theirs effects on the diffuser performance, was then studied.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Sinha, M., and Katz, J., 1999, “Quantitative Visualization of the Flow in a Centrifugal Pump With Diffuser Vanes—Part I: On Flow Structures and Turbulence,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 122(1), pp. 97–107. [CrossRef]
Sinha, M., Katz, J., and Meneveau, C., 1999, “Quantitative Visualization of the Flow in a Centrifugal Pump With Diffuser Vanes—Part II: Addressing Passage-Averaged and Large-Eddy Simulation Modeling Issues in Turbomachinery Flows,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 122(1), pp. 108–116. [CrossRef]
Majidi, K., 2005, “Numerical Study of Unsteady Flow in a Centrifugal Pump,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(2), pp. 363–371. [CrossRef]
Feng, J., Benra, F. K., and Dohmen, H. J., 2010, “Unsteady Flow Investigation in Rotor–Stator Interface of a Radial Diffuser Pump,” Forsch. Ingenieurwes., 74(4), pp. 233–242. [CrossRef]
Akin, O., and Rockwell, D., 1994, “Actively Controlled Radial Flow Pumping System: Manipulation of Spectral Content of Wakes and Wake–Blade Interactions,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 116(3), pp. 528–536. [CrossRef]
Guleren, K. M., and Pinarbasi, A., 2004, “Numerical Simulation of the Stalled Flow Within a Vaned Centrifugal Pump,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 218(4), pp. 425–435. [CrossRef]
Guo, S., and Maruta, Y., 2005, “Experimental Investigations on Pressure Fluctuations and Vibration of the Impeller in a Centrifugal Pump With Vaned Diffusers,” JSME Int. J., Ser. B, 48(1), pp. 136–143. [CrossRef]
Pavesi, G., Cavazzini, G., and Ardizzon, G., 2008, “Time–Frequency Characterization of the Unsteady Phenomena in a Centrifugal Pump,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29(5), pp. 1527–1540. [CrossRef]
Furukawa, A., Takahara, H., Nakagawa, T., and Ono, Y., 2003, “Pressure Fluctuation in a Vaned Diffuser Downstream From a Centrifugal Pump Impeller,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 9(4), pp. 285–292. [CrossRef]
Arndt, N., Acosta, A. J., Brennen, C. E., and Caughey, T. K., 1990, “Experimental Investigation of Rotor/Stator Interaction in a Centrifugal Pump With Several Vaned Diffusers,” ASME J. Turbomach., 111(3), pp. 213–221. [CrossRef]
Eui, Y. K., and Nam, H. C., 2001, “Experimental Study on the Mean Flow Characteristics of Forward—Curved Centrifugal Fans,” KSME Int. J., 15(12), pp. 1728–1738. [CrossRef]
Nakagawa, T., Furukawa, A., and Takahara, H., 2001, “Flow Behavior Downstream of Diffuser Pump Impeller,” ASME J. Turbomach., 29(2), pp. 110–118.
Hong, S. S., and Kang, S. H., 2004, “Flow at the Centrifugal Pump Impeller Exit With the Circumferential Distortion of the Outlet Static Pressure,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 126(1), pp. 81–86. [CrossRef]
Petit, O., and Nilsson, H., 2013, “Numerical Investigations of Unsteady Flow in a Centrifugal Pump With a Vaned Diffuser,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 2013, p. 961580. [CrossRef]
Wuibaut, G., Bois, G., Dupont, P., Caignaert, G., and Stanislas, M., 2002, “PIV Measurements in the Impeller and the Vaneless Diffuser of a Radial Flow Pump in Design and Off-Design Operating Conditions,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124(3), pp. 791–797. [CrossRef]
Dupont, P., Caignaert, G., Bois, G., and Schneider, T., 2005, “Rotor Stator Interactions in a Vaned Diffuser Radial Flow Pump,” ASME 2005 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Houston, Texas, June 19–23, pp. 1087–1094.
Atif, A., Benmandsour, S., Bois, G., and Dupont, P., 2011, “Numerical and Experimental Comparison of the Vaned Diffuser Interaction Inside the Impeller Velocity Field of a Centrifugal Impeller,” Sci. China, 54(2), pp. 286–294. [CrossRef]
Cavazzini, G., Pavesi, G., Ardizzon, G., Dupont, P., Coudert, S., Caignaert, G., and Bois, G., 2009, “Analysis of the Rotor–Stator Interaction in a Radial Flow Pump,” La Houille Blanche, 5, pp. 141–151. [CrossRef]
Cavazzini, G., Dupont, P., Dazin, A., Pavesi, G., Bayeul, A. C., and Bois, G., 2013, “Unsteady Velocity PIV Measurements and 3D Numerical Calculation Comparisons Inside the Impeller of a Radial Pump Model,” 10th European Conference on Turbomachinery-Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Lappeenranta, Finland, Apr. 15–19, pp. 1–9.
Argüelles, D. K. M., Fernández Oro, J. M., and Marigorta Blanco, E., 2009, “Cylindrical Three-Hole Pressure Probe Calibration for Large Angular Range,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 20(2), pp. 57–68. [CrossRef]
Barrand, J. P., Caignaert, G., Graesser, J. E., and Rieutord, E., 1985, “Synthesis of the Results of Tests Air and Water Aimed at Critical Re-Circulating Flow Rates Detections on the Inlet and Outlet of a Centrifugal Impeller,” La Houille Blanche, 5.
Cavazzini, G., 2006, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Rotor–Stator Interaction in Radial Turbomachines,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Idelchik, I. E., 2007, Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, 4th ed., Begell House, New York.
Bayeul, L. A. C., Dupont, P., Miccoli, L., Cavazzini, G., Dazin, A., Pavesi, G., and Bois, G., 2014, “Fluid Leakage Effect on Analysis of a Vaned Diffuser of SHF,” 15th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, Honolulu, HI, Feb. 24–28, pp. 405–420.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Flow angle α at diffuser inlet radius R3: (a) Q/Qn = 0.386, (b) Q/Qn = 0.581, (c) Q/Qn = 0.762, (d) Q/Qn = 0.968, and (e) Q/Qn = 1.12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Pump components flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fluid leakage models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Pressure coefficients of the pump components: (a) overall pressure coefficients of the pump and diffuser and (b) pressure coefficients of the impeller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Probe calibration characteristics: (a) three-hole probe size and (b) probe angle coefficient Cα

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Test rig apparatus: (a) test loop, (b) probe installation diagram, and (c) three-hole probe locations traverses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Absolute velocity coefficient v* at diffuser inlet radius R3: (a) Q/Qn = 0.386, (b) Q/Qn = 0.581, (c) Q/Qn = 0.762, (d) Q/Qn = 0.968, and (e) Q/Qn = 1.12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Static pressure coefficient ΔPsta* at diffuser inlet radius R3: (a) Q/Qn = 0.386, (b) Q/Qn = 0.581, (c) Q/Qn = 0.762, (d) Q/Qn = 0.968, and (e) Q/Qn = 1.12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Total pressure coefficient ΔPtot* at diffuser inlet radius R3: (a) Q/Qn = 0.386, (b) Q/Qn = 0.581, (c) Q/Qn = 0.762, (d) Q/Qn = 0.968, and (e) Q/Qn = 1.12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Average values at the inlet of the diffuser: (a) mean incidence flow angle and (b) radial velocity coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Static pressure coefficient at the mean line: (a) Q/Qn = 0.386, (b) Q/Qn = 0.581, (c) Q/Qn = 0.762, (d) Q/Qn = 0.968, and (e) Q/Qn = 1.12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Evolution of static pressure coefficient downstream of the impeller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Locations of pressure traverses in the vane diffuser

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Statistical results of unsteady wall static pressure: (a) RMS at the pressure side, (b) RMS at the suction side, (c) averaged ΔPsta* at the pressure side, and (d) averaged ΔPsta* at the suction side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Auto PSD of the wall static pressure characteristic: (a) point 2, (b) point 4, (c) point 6, and (d) point 9

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

PIV acquisition system, impeller positions, and measuring plans: (a) PIV acquisition system, (b) data reduction area and lighting method for results given in Tables 3 and 4, and (c) scheme of the impeller positions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of the results between probe and PIV measurement at midspan: (a) comparison of absolute flow angle α and (b) comparison of absolute velocity coefficient v*



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In