0
Research Papers: Flows in Complex Systems

Effect of Nonuniform Flexibility on Hydrodynamic Performance of Pitching Propulsors

[+] Author and Article Information
Samane Zeyghami

Department of Mechanical
Engineering and Mechanics,
Lehigh University,
Bethlehem, PA 18015
e-mail: saz316@lehigh.edu

Keith W. Moored

Department of Mechanical
Engineering and Mechanics,
Lehigh University,
Bethlehem, PA 18015
e-mail: kmoored@lehigh.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 5, 2018; final manuscript received November 2, 2018; published online February 8, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Olivier Coutier-Delgosha.

J. Fluids Eng 141(4), 041108 (Feb 08, 2019) (7 pages) Paper No: FE-18-1081; doi: 10.1115/1.4041976 History: Received February 05, 2018; Revised November 02, 2018

Many aquatic animals propel themselves efficiently through the water by oscillating flexible fins. These fins are, however, not homogeneously flexible, but instead their flexural stiffness varies along their chord and span. Here, we develop a simple model of these functionally graded materials where the chordwise flexibility of the foil is modeled by one or two torsional springs along the chord line. The torsional spring structural model is then strongly coupled to a boundary element fluid model to simulate the fluid–structure interactions. We show that the effective flexibility of the combined fluid–structure system scales with the ratio of the added mass forces acting on the passive portion of the foil and the elastic forces defined by the torsional spring hinge. Importantly, by considering this new scaling of the effective flexibility, the propulsive performance is then detailed for a foil with a flexible hinge that is actively pitching about its leading edge. The scaling allows for the resonance frequency of the fluid–structure system and the bending pattern of the propulsor to be independently varied by altering the effective flexibility and the location of a single torsional spring along the chord, respectively. It is shown that increasing the flexion ratio, by moving the spring away from the leading edge, leads to enhanced propulsive efficiency, but compromises the thrust production. Proper combination of two flexible hinges, however, can result in a gain in both the thrust production and propulsive efficiency.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Wu, T. Y.-T. , 1971, “ Hydromechanics of Swimming Propulsion—Part 3: Swimming and Optimum Movements of Slender Fish With Side Fins,” J. Fluid Mech., 46(3), pp. 545–568. [CrossRef]
Lighthill, M. J. , 1970, “ Aquatic Animal Propulsion of High Hydromechanical Efficiency,” J. Fluid Mech., 44(2), pp. 265–301. [CrossRef]
Dewey, P. A. , Boschitsch, B. M. , Moored, K. W. , Stone, H. A. , and Smits, A. J. , 2013, “ Scaling Laws for the Thrust Production of Flexible Pitching Panels,” J. Fluid Mech., 732, pp. 29–46. [CrossRef]
Masoud, H. , and Alexeev, A. , 2010, “ Resonance of Flexible Flapping Wings at Low Reynolds Number,” Phys. Rev. E, 81(5), p. 56304. [CrossRef]
Katz, J. , and Weihs, D. , 1978, “ Hydrodynamic Propulsion by Large Amplitude Oscillation of an Airfoil With Chordwise Flexibility,” J. Fluid Mech., 88(3), pp. 485–497. [CrossRef]
Zhu, Q. , 2007, “ Numerical Simulation of a Flapping Foil With Chordwise or Spanwise Flexibility,” AIAA J., 45(10), pp. 2448–2457. [CrossRef]
Quinn, D. B. , Lauder, G. V. , and Smits, A. J. , 2015, “ Maximizing the Efficiency of a Flexible Propulsor Using Experimental Optimization,” J. Fluid Mech., 767, pp. 430–448. [CrossRef]
Siala, F. F. , Totpal, A. D. , and Liburdy, J. A. , 2016, “ Characterization of Vortex Dynamics in the Near Wake of an Oscillating Flexible Foil,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 138(10), p. 101202. [CrossRef]
Combes, S. , and Daniel, T. , 2003, “ Flexural Stiffness in Insect Wings—Part I: Scaling and the Influence of Wing Venation,” J. Exp. Biol., 206(Pt. 17), pp. 2979–2987. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fish, F. , and Lauder, G. , 2006, “ Passive and Active Flow Control by Swimming Fishes and Mammals,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech, 38(1), pp. 193–224. [CrossRef]
Bose, N. , Lien, J. , and Ahia, J. , 1990, “ Measurements of the Bodies and Flukes of Several Cetacean Species,” Proc. R. Soc. B, 242(1305), pp. 163–173. [CrossRef]
Kancharala, A. , and Philen, M. , 2016, “ Optimal Chordwise Stiffness Profiles of Self-Propelled Flapping Fins,” Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 11(5), p. 056016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moore, M. N. J. , 2015, “ Torsional Spring is the Optimal Flexibility Arrangement for Thrust Production of a Flapping Wing,” Phys. Fluids, 27(9), p. 091701. [CrossRef]
Riggs, P. , Bowyer, A. , and Vincent, J. , 2010, “ Advantages of a Biomimetic Stiffness Profile in Pitching Flexible Fin Propulsion,” J. Bionic Eng., 7(2), pp. 113–119. [CrossRef]
Katz, J. , and Plotkin, A. , 2001, Low-Speed Aerodynamics, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
Quinn, D. B. , Moored, K. W. , Dewey, P. A. , and Smits, A. J. , 2014, “ Unsteady Propulsion Near a Solid Boundary,” J. Fluid Mech., 742, pp. 152–170. [CrossRef]
Willis, D. J. , 2006, “ An Unsteady, Accelerated, High Order Panel Method With Vortex Particle Wakes,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/35592
Wie, S. Y. , Lee, S. , and Lee, D. J. , 2009, “ Potential Panel and Time-Marching Free-Wake-Coupling Analysis for Helicopter Rotor,” J. Aircr., 46(3), pp. 1030–1041. [CrossRef]
Pan, Y. , Dong, X. , Zhu, Q. , and Yue, D. K. P. , 2012, “ Boundary-Element Method for the Prediction of Performance of Flapping Foils With Leading-Edge Separation,” J. Fluid Mech., 698, pp. 446–467. [CrossRef]
Krasny, R. , 1986, “ Desingularization of Periodic Vortex Sheet Roll-Up,” J. Comput. Phys., 65(2), pp. 292–313. [CrossRef]
Moored, K. W. , and Quinn, D. B. , 2018, “ Inviscid Scaling Laws of a Self-Propelled Pitching Airfoil,” AIAA J. (epub).
Akoz, E. , and Moored, K. W. , 2018, “ Unsteady Propulsion by an Intermittent Swimming Gait,” J. Fluid Mech., 834, pp. 149–172.
Mok, D. P. , and Wall, W. , 2001, “ Partitioned Analysis Schemes for the Transient Interaction of Incompressible Flows and Nonlinear Flexible Structures,” Trends in Computational Structural Mechanics, W. A. Wall, K.-U. Bletzinger, and K. Schweizerhof, eds., CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain.
Küttler, U. , and Wall, W. A. , 2008, “ Fixed-Point Fluid-Structure Interaction Solvers With Dynamic Relaxation,” Comput. Mech., 43(1), pp. 61–72. [CrossRef]
Borazjani, I. , Ge, L. , and Sotiropoulos, F. , 2008, “ Curvilinear Immersed Boundary Method for Simulating Fluid Structure Interaction With Complex 3D Rigid Bodies,” J. Comput. Phys., 227(16), pp. 7587–7620. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moore, M. N. J. , 2014, “ Analytical Results on the Role of Flexibility in Flapping Propulsion,” J. Fluid Mech., 757, pp. 599–612. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the model for a single spring

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Propulsive efficiency as a function of (a) number of time steps and (b) number of body panels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Analytical solutions for thrust and power coefficient as a function of reduced frequency, for two different nondimensional spring stiffnesses, are shown with solid lines. These solutions are taken from Ref. [26]. Closed circles are the solutions calculated by the present numerical method.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Trailing edge amplitude, (b) thrust coefficient, (c) power coefficient, and (d) efficiency as a function of Πk

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variation of thrust (a) and power (b) coefficients, C′t and C′p, defined by Eq. (3) with Πk. Contours of C′t and C′p in λ–Πk plane. Dotted lines are the contours of propulsive efficiency.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Trailing edge amplitude, (b) thrust coefficient, (c) power coefficient, and (d) efficiency as a function of Πk for two flexible hinge configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Change in the relative orientation of the solid elements versus time, within one cycle. The line representing θ0 shows the prescribed pitching motion of the leading edge. The lines representing θ1 and θ2, respectively, show the deflection angles of the second and the third element. The deflection angles are measured relative to the preceding element. The angles are shown for three different Πk values of 0.2, 0.35, and 0.5.

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In