Abstract

There has been unprecedented development in the field of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) over the past few years. UGVs have been used in many fields including civilian and military with applications such as military reconnaissance, transportation, and search and research missions. This is due to their increasing capabilities in terms of performance, power, and tackling risky missions. The level of autonomy given to these UGVs is a critical factor to consider. In many applications of multirobotic systems like “search-and-rescue” missions, teamwork between human and robots is essential. In this article, given a team of manned ground vehicles (MGVs) and UGVs, the objective is to develop a model that can minimize the number of teams and total distance traveled while considering human–robot interaction (HRI) studies. The human costs of managing a team of UGVs by a MGV are based on human–robot interaction (HRI) studies. In this research, we introduce a combinatorial, multi-objective ground vehicle path planning problem that takes human–robot interactions into consideration. The objective of the problem is to find: ideal number of teams of MGVs-UGVs that follow a leader–follower framework where a set of UGVs follow an MGV and path for each team such that the missions are completed efficiently.

References

1.
Robotics Tomorrow, 2020, “Unmanned Ground Vehicles Market to Reach usd 7 Billion by 2026, https://www.roboticstomorrow.com/story/2020/06/unmanned-ground-vehicles-market-to-reach-usd-7-billion-by-2026/15351/, Accessed February 15, 2021.
2.
AP NEWS, 2019, “Uglobal Unmanned Ground Vehicles (URGV) Market to 2025 by Application—Military (isr, eod, combat support, transportation), Commercial (Firefighting, cbrn, Physical Security, Oil and Gas)—researchandmarkets.com,” https://apnews.com/press-release/pr-businesswire/28f7cfd0527f4ba7893723f7b045fa51, Accessed February 15, 2021.
3.
Zhang
,
T.
,
Li
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
C.-s.
,
Liang
,
H.-w.
,
Li
,
P.
,
Wang
,
T.-m.
,
Li
,
S.
,
Zhu
,
Y.-l.
, and
Wu
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Current Trends in the Development of Intelligent Unmanned Autonomous Systems
,”
Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
68
85
.
4.
Aerospace and Defense, 2020, “The Role of Autonomous Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technologies in Defense Applications,” https://www.aerodefensetech.com/component/content/article/adt/features/articles/37888, Accessed February. 20, 2021.
5.
FLC, 2019, “Devcom Ground Vehicle Systems Center,” https://federallabs.org/labs/devcom-ground-vehicle-systems-center, Accessed February 20, 2021.
6.
Council
,
N. R.
,
2003
,
Technology Development For Army Unmanned Ground Vehicles
,
National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
.
7.
Goodrich
,
M. A.
, and
Schultz
,
A. C.
,
2008
, “
Human–Robot Interaction: A Survey
,”
Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction
,
1
(
3
), pp.
203
275
.
8.
Toth
,
P.
, and
Vigo
,
D.
,
2002
,
The Vehicle Routing Problem
,
SIAM
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
9.
Ralphs
,
T. K.
,
Kopman
,
L.
,
Pulleyblank
,
W. R.
, and
Trotter
,
L. E.
,
2003
, “
On the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
Math. Programm.
,
94
(
2
), pp.
343
359
.
10.
Cattrysse
,
D. G.
, and
Van Wassenhove
,
L. N.
,
1992
, “
A Survey of Algorithms for the Generalized Assignment Problem
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
,
60
(
3
), pp.
260
272
.
11.
Christofides
,
N.
,
1976
, “
The Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
Revue française d’automatique, informatique, recherche opérationnelle. Recherche opérationnelle
,
10
(
V1
), pp.
55
70
.
12.
Lysgaard
,
J.
,
Letchford
,
A. N.
, and
Eglese
,
R. W.
,
2004
, “
A New Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
Math. Programm.
,
100
(
2
), pp.
423
445
.
13.
Fukasawa
,
R.
,
Longo
,
H.
,
Lysgaard
,
J.
,
De Aragão
,
M. P.
,
Reis
,
M.
,
Uchoa
,
E.
, and
Werneck
,
R. F.
,
2006
, “
Robust Branch-and-Cut-and-Price for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
Math. Programm.
,
106
(
3
), pp.
491
511
.
14.
Baldacci
,
R.
,
Christofides
,
N.
, and
Mingozzi
,
A.
,
2008
, “
An Exact Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem Based on the Set Partitioning Formulation With Additional Cuts
,”
Math. Programm.
,
115
(
2
), pp.
351
385
.
15.
Faulin
,
J.
,
Gilibert
,
M.
,
Juan
,
A. A.
,
Vilajosana
,
X.
, and
Ruiz
,
R.
,
2008
, “
Sr-1: A Simulation-Based Algorithm for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
2008 Winter Simulation Conference
,
Miami, FL
,
Dec. 7–10
,
IEEE
, pp.
2708
2716
.
16.
Jozefowiez
,
N.
,
Semet
,
F.
, and
Talbi
,
E.-G.
,
2009
, “
An Evolutionary Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem With Route Balancing
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
,
195
(
3
), pp.
761
769
.
17.
Mester
,
D.
,
Bräysy
,
O.
, and
Dullaert
,
W.
,
2007
, “
A Multi-Parametric Evolution Strategies Algorithm for Vehicle Routing Problems
,”
Expert. Syst. Appl.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
508
517
.
18.
Lin
,
S.-W.
,
Lee
,
Z.-J.
,
Ying
,
K.-C.
, and
Lee
,
C.-Y.
,
2009
, “
Applying Hybrid Meta-Heuristics for Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
Expert. Syst. Appl.
,
36
(
2
), pp.
1505
1512
.
19.
Gendreau
,
M.
,
Laporte
,
G.
, and
Potvin
,
J.-Y.
,
2002
, “Metaheuristsis for the Capacitated VRP,”
The Vehicle Routing Problem
,
P.
Toth
, and
D.
Vigo
, eds.,
SIAM
,
Bologna, Italy
, pp.
129
154
.
20.
Barbarosoglu
,
G.
, and
Ozgur
,
D.
,
1999
, “
A Tabu Search Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
Comput. Oper. Res.
,
26
(
3
), pp.
255
270
.
21.
Baker
,
B. M.
, and
Ayechew
,
M.
,
2003
, “
A Genetic Algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem
,”
Comput. Oper. Res.
,
30
(
5
), pp.
787
800
.
22.
Sheridan
,
T. B.
,
2016
, “
Human–Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges
,”
Human Factors
,
58
(
4
), pp.
525
532
.
23.
Mi
,
Z.-Q.
, and
Yang
,
Y.
,
2013
, “
Human-Robot Interaction in Uvs Swarming: A Survey
,”
Int. J. Comp. Sci. Issues
,
10
(
2 Part 1
), p.
273
.
24.
Parasuraman
,
R.
, and
Wickens
,
C. D.
,
2008
, “
Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation
,”
Human factors
,
50
(
3
), pp.
511
520
.
25.
Murphy
,
R. R.
,
2004
, “
Human–Robot Interaction in Rescue Robotics
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, and Cybern., Part C (Appl. Rev.)
,
34
(
2
), pp.
138
153
.
26.
Liu
,
Y.
, and
Nejat
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Robotic Urban Search and Rescue: A Survey From the Control Perspective
,”
J. Intell. Robot. Syst.
,
72
(
2
), pp.
147
165
.
27.
Crandall
,
J. W.
,
Goodrich
,
M. A.
,
Olsen
,
D. R.
, and
Nielsen
,
C. W.
,
2005
, “
Validating Human-Robot Interaction Schemes in Multitasking Environments
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, and Cybern.-Part A: Syst. Humans
,
35
(
4
), pp.
438
449
.
28.
Lewis
,
M.
,
Wang
,
H.
,
Chien
,
S.-Y.
,
Scerri
,
P.
,
Velagapudi
,
P.
,
Sycara
,
K.
, and
Kane
,
B.
,
2010
, “
Teams Organization and Performance in Multi-Human/Multi-Robot Teams
,”
2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
,
Nice, France
,
Sept. 22–26
,
IEEE
, pp.
1617
1623
.
29.
Velagapudi
,
P.
,
Scerri
,
P.
,
Sycara
,
K.
,
Wang
,
H.
,
Lewis
,
M.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Scaling Effects in Multi-Robot Control
,”
2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
,
Istanbul, Turkey
,
Oct. 10–13
,
IEEE
, pp.
2121
2126
.
30.
Chen
,
J.-C.
,
2003
, “
Dijkstra’s Shortest Path Algorithm
,”
J. Formalized Math.
,
15
(
9
), pp.
237
247
.
You do not currently have access to this content.