Abstract

Interactions with marine vegetation can disrupt unmanned underwater vehicle missions. Very little information is publicly available about the mechanisms causing these interactions or the consequences of them. This article compares the interactions between three different style underwater vehicles and two different types of marine vegetation. Similar test setups and procedures were used to allow for the direct comparison between REMUS-100, BlueROV2, and GhostSwimmer vehicles. Experimental test runs were conducted at different vegetation densities using either synthetic eelgrass or synthetic giant kelp. The resulting interactions depended on the vegetation type, vegetation density, propulsion mechanism of the vehicle, and vehicle geometry. Synthetic giant kelp caused a multitude of interactions with the dominant ones being interference, blockage, and entanglement with the vehicle body. Collectively, these three interactions occurred 84% of the time on giant kelp runs where an interaction was observed. Eelgrass caused propeller entanglement and even body blockage depending on the unmanned underwater vehicle geometry. In high density eelgrass, we observed that a spinning propulsion mechanism experiences entanglement 100% of the time when at low speed. The use of an oscillating tail for propulsion coupled with a completely streamlined body appears to successfully mitigate adverse marine vegetation interactions.

References

1.
Breivik
,
M.
, and
Fossen
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Guidance Laws for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
,”
Underwater Veh.
,
4
(
01
), pp.
51
59
.
2.
Bluebird Marine Systems Limited
, “
ROVs – UUVs – USVs & drones
,” https://www.bluebird-electric.net/ROV˙remotely˙operated˙vessels˙UUV˙underwater˙unmanned˙autonomous˙drones.htm, Accessed October 16, 2021.
3.
National Research Council
,
2001
,
Naval Mine Warfare: Operational and Technical Challenges for Naval Forces
,
The National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
. See also https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10176/naval-mine-warfare-operational-and-technical-challenges-for-naval-forces.
5.
Deep Trekker
, “
Top 3 Uses for Mini-ROVs in the Navy
,” https://www.deeptrekker.com/resources/top-3-uses-for-mini-rovs-in-the-navy, Accessed October 16, 2021.
6.
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)
, “
Remotely Operated Vehicles
,” https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/SUPSALV/00C2-Salvage/Remotely-Operated-Vehicles/, Accessed October 16, 2021.
7.
Kodati
,
P.
, and
Deng
,
X.
,
2009
, “Bio-inspired Robotic Fish With Multiple Fins,”
Underwater Vehicles
,
Inzartsev
,
A. V.
, ed.,
IntechOpen
,
Rijeka
, Chap. 6. See also .
8.
Tyree
,
C.
,
2019
, “
‘Tunabot’ Unveiled – First Robotic Fish to Keep Pace With a Tuna
,” https://scitechdaily.com/tunabot-unveiled-first-robotic-fish-to-keep-pace-with-a-tuna-video/
9.
Wasserman
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Engineers Use Biomimicry to Innovate the Propulsion of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles
,” https://www.ansys.com/blog/biomimicry-innovates-unmanned-underwater-vehicles
10.
Great Ocean Road Coast Committee
,
2011
, “
An Underwater World in Decline
.” https://gorcc.org/tag/giant-kelp/
11.
Short
,
F.
,
Carruthers
,
T.
,
Waycott
,
M.
,
Kendrick
,
G.
, and
Dennison
,
W.
,
2010
, “
Zostera Marina the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
,” Tech. Rep. e.T153538A4516675,
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
, UK, 10. See also URL
12.
Oceana Org
, “
Corals and Other Invertebrates: Giant Kelp
.” https://oceana.org/marine-life/corals-and-other-invertebrates/giant-kelp, Accessed September 6, 2021.
13.
Richardson Bay Audubon Center & Sanctuary
, “
Conversation – All About Eelgrass
,” https://richardsonbay.audubon.org/conversation/all-about-eelgrass, Accessed February 13, 2021.
14.
Wiggins
,
J.
,
Zeglin
,
C.
, and
Allensworth
,
W.
,
2015
, “
Concentric Cutting Assembly, Concentric Cutting System, and Net Penetration Method
,” https://patents.google.com/patent/US8961079. Patent number 9, 061, 361 B2.
15.
Harbin Engineering University
,
2016
, “
UUV (Unmanned Underwater Vehicle) Fishing Net Winding Prevention Device
,” https://patents.google.com/patent/CN105857547A/en, Patent number 105857547 A.
16.
Irgens
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Experimental Assessment of Entanglement for Unmanned Underwater Vehicle With an Open Three-bladed Propeller
,” Master’s thesis,
Naval Postgraduate School
,
Monterey, CA
.
17.
Irgens
,
K. E.
,
Klamo
,
J. T.
, and
Pollman
,
A. G.
,
2021
, “
Experimental Assessment of Entanglement for a Propeller Driven Unmanned Underwater Vehicle
,”
Naval Eng. J.
,
133
(
3
), pp.
103
114
.
18.
Purcell
,
M.
,
von Alt
,
C.
,
Allen
,
B.
,
Austin
,
T.
,
Forrester
,
N.
,
Goldsborough
,
R.
, and
Stokey
,
R.
,
2000
, “
New Capabilities of the Remus Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
,” Oceans 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37158, Vol.
1
),
Providence, RI
,
Sept. 11–14
, pp.
147
151
.
19.
Blue Robotics Inc
, “
BlueROV2
,” https://bluerobotics.com/store/rov/bluerov2/, Accessed July 12, 2021.
20.
Naval Drones
, “
GhostSwimmer
,” http://www.navaldrones.com/GhostSwimmer.html, Accessed December 3, 2021.
21.
Anuat
,
G. V.
,
2021
, “
Investigating Interactions Between a Box-Shaped UUV and Marine Vegetation
,” Master’s thesis,
Naval Postgraduate School
,
Monterey, CA
. 12.
22.
Bio Models Co
,
2009
, “
Bio Models Company – Who We Are
,” https://biomodelscompany.com/who-we-are/
23.
Burdick
,
D. M.
, and
Kendrick
,
G. A.
,
2001
, “Standards for Seagrass Collection, Identification and Sample Design,”
Global Seagrass Research Methods
,
Short
,
F. T.
and
Coles
,
R. G.
, eds.,
Elsevier Science
,
Amsterdam
, pp.
79
100
.
24.
Krause-Jensen
,
D.
,
Pedersen
,
M. F.
, and
Jensen
,
C.
,
2003
, “
Regulation of Eelgrass (Zostera Marina) Cover Along Depth Gradients in Danish Coastal Waters
,”
Estuaries
,
26
(
4
), pp.
866
877
. See also .
25.
Vieira
,
V. M. N. C. S.
,
Lopes
,
I. E.
, and
Creed
,
J. C.
,
2018
, “
The Biomass–Density Relationship in Seagrasses and Its Use As an Ecological Indicator
,”
BMC Ecol.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
1
16
.
26.
Steneck
,
R. S.
,
Graham
,
M. H.
,
Bourque
,
B. J.
,
Corbett
,
D.
,
Erlandson
,
J. M.
,
Estes
,
J. A.
, and
Tegner
,
M. J.
,
2002
, “
Kelp Forest Ecosystems: Biodiversity, Stability, Resilience and Future
,”
Environ. Conserv.
,
29
(
4
), pp.
436
459
.
27.
Olesen
,
B.
, and
Sand-Jensen
,
K.
,
1994
, “
Demography of Shallow Eelgrass (Zostera Marina) Populations—Shoot Dynamics and Biomass Development
,”
J. Ecol.
,
82
(
2
), pp.
379
390
.
28.
Packard
,
G. E.
,
Stokey
,
R.
,
Christenson
,
R.
,
Jaffre
,
F.
,
Purcell
,
M.
, and
Littlefield
,
R.
,
2010
, “
Hull Inspection and Confined Area Search Capabilities of REMUS Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
,”
Oceans 2010 MTS/IEEE Seattle
,
Seattle, WA
,
Sept. 20–23
, pp.
1
4
.
29.
Packard
,
G. E.
,
Kukulya
,
A.
,
Austin
,
T.
,
Dennett
,
M.
,
Littlefield
,
R.
,
Packard
,
G.
,
Purcell
,
M.
,
Stokey
,
R.
, and
Skomal
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Continuous Autonomous Tracking and Imaging of White Sharks and Basking Sharks Using a REMUS-100 AUV
,”
2013 OCEANS – San Diego
,
San Diego, CA
,
Sept. 23–26
, pp.
1
5
.
30.
Johansen
,
T. A.
,
Zolich
,
A.
,
Hansen
,
T.
, and
Sørensen
,
A. J.
,
2014
, “
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle As Communication Relay for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle – Field Tests
,”
2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)
,
Austin, TX
,
Dec. 8–12
, pp.
1469
1474
.
31.
Sarda
,
E. I.
, and
Dhanak
,
M. R.
,
2019
, “
Launch and Recovery of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle From a Station-Keeping Unmanned Surface Vehicle
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
44
(
2
), pp.
290
299
.
32.
Norgren
,
P.
,
Ludvigsen
,
M.
,
Ingebretsen
,
T.
, and
Hovstein
,
V. E.
,
2015
, “
Tracking and Remote Monitoring of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Using an Unmanned Surface Vehicle in the Trondheim Fjord
,”
Oceans 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington
,
Washington, DC
,
Oct. 19–22
, pp.
1
6
.
33.
Shcherbina
,
A. Y.
,
Gawarkiewicz
,
G. G.
,
Linder
,
C. A.
, and
Thorrold
,
S. R.
,
2008
, “
Mapping Bathymetric and Hydrographic Features of Glover’s Reef, Belize, With a REMUS Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
,”
Limnolog. Oceanograph.
,
53
(
5part2
), pp.
2264
2272
.
34.
Gebbie
,
J.
,
Siderius
,
M.
, and
Allen
,
J. S.
,
2012
, “
Aspect-Dependent Radiated Noise Analysis of an Underway Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
132
(
5
), pp.
EL351
EL357
.
35.
Holmes
,
J. D.
,
Carey
,
W. M.
, and
Lynch
,
J. F.
,
2006
, “
Results From an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Towed Hydrophone Array Experiment in Nantucket Sound
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
120
(
2
), pp.
EL15
EL21
.
36.
Stokey
,
R.
,
Purcell
,
M.
,
Forrester
,
N.
,
Austin
,
T.
,
Goldsborough
,
R.
,
Allen
,
B.
, and
von Alt
,
C.
,
1997
, “
A Docking System for REMUS, an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
,”
Oceans ’97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2
,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
,
Oct. 6–9
, pp.
1132
1136
.
37.
Goodman
,
L.
,
Levine
,
E. R.
, and
Wang
,
Z.
,
2010
, “
Subsurface Observations of Surface Waves From an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
35
(
4
), pp.
779
784
.
38.
Plueddemann
,
A. J.
,
Kukulya
,
A. L.
,
Stokey
,
R.
, and
Freitag
,
L.
,
2012
, “
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Operations Beneath Coastal Sea Ice
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
,
17
(
1
), pp.
54
64
.
39.
General Dynamics Mission Systems
, “
Bluefin SandShark Unmanned Underwater Vehicle
,” https://gdmissionsystems.com/products/underwater-vehicles/bluefin-sandshark-autonomous-underwater-vehicle, Accessed April 18, 2022.
40.
BAE Systems
, “
Riptide Unmanned Undersea Vehicles
,” https://www.baesystems.com/en/product/riptide-family-of-autonomous-undersea-vehicles, Accessed April 18, 2022.
41.
Teledyne Marine
, “
vLBV300 – Seascape Subsea BV
,” https://www.seascapesubsea.com/product/vlbv300/. Accessed April 18, 2022.
42.
Strategic Robotic Systems
, “
FUSION Next Generation UUV
,” https://www.srsfusion.com/, Accessed April 18, 2022.
43.
Thomson
,
E. A.
,
1994
, “Robotuna Is First of New ‘Genetic’ Line,” https://news.mit.edu/1994/robotuna-0921
You do not currently have access to this content.