The biomechanics of skin and underlying tissues plays a fundamental role in the human sense of touch. It governs the mechanics of contact between the skin and an object, the transmission of the mechanical signals through the skin, and their transduction into neural signals by the mechanoreceptors. To better understand the mechanics of touch, it is necessary to establish quantitative relationships between the loads imposed on the skin by an object, the state of stresses/strains at mechanoreceptor locations, and the resulting neural response. Towards this goal, 3-D finite-element models of human and monkey fingertips with realistic external geometries were developed. By computing fingertip model deformations under line loads, it was shown that a multi-layered model was necessary to match previously obtained in vivo data on skin surface displacements. An optimal ratio of elastic moduli of the layers was determined through numerical experiments whose results were matched with empirical data. Numerical values of the elastic moduli of the skin layers were obtained by matching computed results with empirically determined force-displacement relationships for a variety of indentors. Finally, as an example of the relevance of the model to the study of tactile neural response, the multilayered 3-D finite-element model was shown to be able to predict the responses of the slowly adapting type I (SA-I) mechanoreceptors to indentations by complex object shapes.

1.
Lanir, Y., 1987, “Skin Mechanics,” In: Handbook of Bioengineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2.
Srinivasan
,
M. A.
, and
Dandekar
,
K.
,
1996
, “
An Investigation of the Mechanics of Tactile Sense Using Two-Dimensional Models of the Primate Fingertip
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
118
, pp.
48
55
.
3.
Srinivasan
,
M. A.
,
1989
, “
Surface Deflection of Primate Fingertip Under Line Load
,”
J. Biomech.
,
22
, pp.
343
349
.
4.
Phillips
,
J. R.
, and
Johnson
,
K. O.
,
1981
, “
Tactile Spatial Resolution. II. Neural Representation of Bars, Edges, and Gratings in Monkey Primary Afferents
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
,
46
, pp.
1192
1203
.
5.
Phillips
,
J. R.
, and
Johnson
,
K. O.
,
1981
, “
Tactile Spatial Resolution. III. A Continuum Mechanics Model of Skin Predicting Mechanoreceptor Responses to Bars, Edges, and Gratings
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
,
46
, pp.
1204
1225
.
6.
Serina
,
E. R.
,
Mockenstrum
,
E.
,
Mote
,
C. D.
, Jr.
, and
Rempel
,
D.
,
1998
, “
A Structural Model of the Forced Compression of the Fingertip Pulp
,”
J. Biomech.
,
31
, pp.
639
646
.
7.
Serina
,
E. R.
,
Mote
,
C. D.
, Jr.
, and
Rempel
,
D.
,
1997
, “
Force Response of the Fingertip Pulp to Repeated Compression—Effects of Loading Rate, Loading Angle and Anthropometry
,”
J. Biomech.
,
30
, pp.
1035
1040
.
8.
Maeno
,
T.
,
Kobayashi
,
K.
, and
Yamazaki
,
N.
,
1998
, “
Relationship Between the Structure of Human Finger Tissue and the Location of Tactile Receptors
,”
JSME Int. J.
,
41
, pp.
94
100
.
9.
Maeno, T., and Kobayashi, K., 1998, “FE Analysis of the Dynamic Characteristics of the Human Finger Pad With Objects With/Without Surface Roughness,” Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC-64, pp. 279–286.
10.
Pawluk
,
D. T. V.
, and
Howe
,
R. D.
,
1999
, “
Dynamic Lumped Element Response of the Human Fingerpad
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
121
, pp.
178
183
.
11.
Srinivasan
,
M. A.
, and
LaMotte
,
R. H.
,
1987
, “
Tactile Discrimination of Shape: Responses of Slowly and Rapidly Adapting Mechanoreceptive Afferents to a Step Indented Into the Monkey Fingerpad
,”
J. Neurosci.
,
7
, pp.
1682
1697
.
12.
North
,
J. F.
, and
Gibson
,
F.
,
1978
, “
Volume Compressibility of Human Abdominal Skin
,”
J. Biomech.
,
11
, pp.
203
207
.
13.
Vossoughi
,
J.
, and
Vaishnav
,
R. N.
,
1979
, “
Comments on the Paper ‘Volume Compressibility of Human Abdominal Skin,’
J. Biomech.
,
12
, p.
481
481
.
14.
Srinivasan
,
M. A.
,
Gulati
,
R. J.
, and
Dandekar
,
K.
,
1992
, “
In Vivo Compressibility of the Human Fingertip
,”
Adv. Bioeng.
,
22
, pp.
573
576
.
15.
Tregear, R. T., 1966, Physical Functions of Skin, Academic Press, New York, NY.
16.
Gulati, R. J., and Srinivasan, M. A., 1997, Determination of Mechanical Properties of the Human Fingerpad in Vivo Using a Tactile Stimulator, MIT, Research Laboratory of Electronics Technical Report No. 605.
17.
Lanir
,
Y.
, and
Fung
,
Y. C.
,
1974
, “
Two-Dimensional Mechanical Properties of Rabbit Skin-II. Experimental Results
,”
J. Biomech.
,
7
, pp.
171
182
.
18.
Fung, Y. C., 1993, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
19.
Daly
,
C. H.
,
1982
, “
Biomechanical Properties of Dermis
,”
J. Invest. Dermatol.
,
79
, pp.
17s–20s
17s–20s
.
20.
Pawluk
,
D. T. V.
, and
Howe
,
R. D.
,
1999
, “
Dynamic Contact of the Human Fingerpad Against a Flat Surface
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
121
, pp.
605
611
.
21.
Srinivasan, M. A., and LaMotte, R. H., 1991, Encoding of Shape in the Responses of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors, In: Information Processing in the Somatosensory System, Eds: O. Franzen and J. Westman, Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series, MacMillan Press.
22.
Grahame
,
R.
,
1968
, “
Elasticity of Human Skin in Vivo
,”
Ann. Phys. Med.
,
10
, pp.
130
136
.
23.
Veronda
,
D. R.
, and
Westmann
,
R. A.
,
1970
, “
Mechanical Characterization of Skin-Finite Deformations
,”
J. Biomech.
,
3
, pp.
111
124
.
24.
Manschot
,
J. F. M.
, and
Brakkee
,
A. J. M.
,
1986
, “
The Measurement and Modelling of the Mechanical Properties of Human Skin In Vivo—I. The Measurement
,”
J. Biomech.
,
19
, pp.
511
515
.
25.
Oxlund
,
H.
,
Manschot
,
J.
, and
Viidik
,
A.
,
1988
, “
The Role of Elastin in the Mechanical Properties of Skin
,”
J. Biomech.
,
21
, pp.
213
218
.
26.
Pan
,
L.
,
Zan
,
L.
, and
Foster
,
S.
,
1997
, “
In Vivo High-Frequency Ultrasound Assessment of Skin Elasticity
,”
Proc.-IEEE Ultrason. Symp.
,
2
, pp.
1087
1091
.
You do not currently have access to this content.