Abstract

Conceptualization and design of intellectualized, socialized, and personalized cyber-physical systems (CPSs) need integration of existing knowledge across the involved disciplines, as well as exploration and synthesis of novel knowledge beyond disciplinary boundaries. The latter needs a combined use of interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research. Supradisciplinary research has emerged as a new doctrine of combining these research approaches from epistemological, methodological, and procedural perspectives. However, no methodology can be found in the literature that could facilitate the practical execution of supradisciplinary research programs. This position paper proposes a conceptual framework that can be used as a blueprint for operationalization of such undertakings. The framework rests on six generic pillars: (i) problematics, (ii) infrastructure, (iii) method, (iv) stakeholders, (v) operations, and (vi) knowledge. It specifies the major concerns that have to be taken into consideration in a systematic manner in developing executional scenarios for supradisciplinary research. The framework facilitates (i) management of research organization tasks, (ii) joint formation of shared research infrastructure, (ii) setting up concrete research program, (iii) academic partnering and public stakeholder involvement, (iv) process flow management and capacity/competence allocation, (v) a holistic knowledge synthesis, assessment, and consolidation, and (vi) development of tools supporting the preparation and execution of large-scale supradisciplinary research. In its current form, it does not cover the specific societal and personal issues of a successful organization of the inquiry at individual researchers, research teams, and research community levels. A community-based follow-up research may focus on the practical application and testing of the framework in concrete cases—a task that an individual researcher cannot address.

References

1.
Horváth
,
I.
,
2022
, “
Designing Next-Generation Cyber-Physical Systems: Why Is It an Issue?
J. Integr. Des. Process Sci.
,
26
(
3-4
), pp.
1
33
.
2.
Horváth
,
I.
, and
Gerritsen
,
B. H.
,
2012
, “
Cyber-Physical Systems: Concepts, Technologies and Implementation Principles
,”
Proceedings of the Ninth International Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering Symposium—TMCE 2012
,
Karlsruhe, Germany
,
May 7–11
, pp.
19
36
.
3.
Dumitrache
,
I.
,
Caramihai
,
S. I.
,
Sacala
,
I. S.
,
Moisescu
,
M. A.
, and
Popescu
,
D. C.
,
2020
, “
Future Enterprise as an Intelligent Cyber-Physical System
,”
IFAC-PapersOnLine
,
53
(
2
), pp.
10873
10878
.
4.
Horváth
,
I.
, and
Tavčar
,
J.
,
2021
, “
Designing Cyber-Physical Systems for Runtime Self-Adaptation: Knowing More About What We Miss…
,”
J. Integr. Des. Process Sci.
,
25
(
2
), pp.
1
26
.
5.
Leitão
,
P.
,
Colombo
,
A. W.
, and
Karnouskos
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Industrial Automation Based on Cyber-Physical Systems Technologies: Prototype Implementations and Challenges
,”
Comput. Ind.
,
81
, pp.
11
25
.
6.
Horváth
,
I.
,
Rusák
,
Z.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2017
, “
Order Beyond Chaos: Introducing the Notion of Generation to Characterize the Continuously Evolving Implementations of Cyber-Physical Systems
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Cleveland, OH
,
Aug. 6–9
, pp.
1
14
.
7.
Srinivasan
,
V.
,
2013
, “
Why Should We Care About Cyber-Physical Systems?
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
13
(
3
), p.
030301
.
8.
Simon
,
D.
, and
Schiemer
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Crossing Boundaries: Complex Systems, Transdisciplinarity and Applied Impact Agendas
,”
Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability
,
12
, pp.
6
11
.
9.
Horváth
,
I.
,
2015
, “
An Initial Categorization of Foundational Research in Complex Technical Systems
,”
J. Zhejiang Univ.: Sci. A
,
16
(
9
), pp.
681
705
.
10.
Horváth
,
I.
,
2004
, “
A Treatise on Order in Engineering Design Research
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
15
(
3
), pp.
155
181
.
11.
Balsiger
,
P. W.
,
2004
, “
Supradisciplinary Research Practices: History, Objectives and Rationale
,”
Futures
,
36
(
4
), pp.
407
421
.
12.
Horváth
,
I.
, and
Pourtalebi
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Fundamentals of a Mereo-Operandi Theory to Support Transdisciplinary Modeling and Co-Design of Cyber-Physical Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Boston, MA
,
Aug 2–5
, ASME, pp.
1
12
.
13.
Ochara
,
N. M.
,
2022
, Reflecting on the Nature of Science and the ‘Little Known’ Role of Retroductive Reasoning in Research. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4154972, Accessed January 1, 2023.
14.
NASEM
,
2019
,
Fostering the Culture of Convergence in Research: Proceedings of a Workshop
,
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. National Academies Press
,
New York
.
15.
Nowotny
,
H.
,
Scott
,
P.
, and
Gibbons
,
M.
,
2003
, “
“Mode 2” Revisited: The new Production of Knowledge
,”
Minerva
,
41
(
3
), pp.
179
194
.
16.
Horváth
,
I.
,
2017
, “
A Method for Systematic Elaboration of Research Phenomena in Design Research
,”
Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design
,
Vancouver, Canada
,
Aug. 21–25
,
University of British Columbia
, pp.
1
10
.
17.
Horváth
,
I.
,
2023
, “
A First Inventory of Investigational Concerns for Prognostic Systems Thinking Based on an Extended Conceptual Framework
,”
J. Integr. Des. Process Sci.
,
27
(
1
), pp.
1
25
.
18.
Rousseau
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Systems Research and the Quest for Scientific Systems Principles
,”
Systems
,
5
(
2
), p.
25
.
19.
Parker
,
J. R.
,
2008
, “
Beyond Disciplinarity: Humanities and Supercomplexity
,”
London Rev. Educ.
,
6
(
3
), pp.
255
266
.
20.
Scholz
,
R. W.
, and
Steiner
,
G.
,
2015
, “
The Real Type and Ideal Type of Transdisciplinary Processes: Part I—Theoretical Foundations
,”
Sustainability Sci.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
527
544
.
21.
Scholz
,
R. W.
, and
Steiner
,
G.
,
2015
, “
The Real Type and Ideal Type of Transdisciplinary Processes: Part II—What Constraints and Obstacles Do We Meet in Practice?
,”
Sustainability Sci.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
653
671
.
22.
Buanes
,
A.
, and
Jentoft
,
S.
,
2009
, “
Building Bridges: Institutional Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity
,”
Futures
,
41
(
7
), pp.
446
454
.
23.
Schmidt
,
J. C.
,
2008
, “
Towards a Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity
,”
Poiesis Praxis
,
5
(
1
), pp.
53
69
.
24.
Klein
,
J. T.
,
2010
, “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity,”
Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
, pp.
15
30
.
25.
CohenMiller
,
A.
, and
Pate
,
E.
,
2019
, “
A Model for Developing Interdisciplinary Research Theoretical Frameworks
,”
Qual. Rep.
,
24
(
6
), pp.
1211
1226
.
26.
Fiore
,
S. M.
,
2008
, “
Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork: How the Science of Teams Can Inform Team Science
,”
Small Group Res.
,
39
(
3
), pp.
251
277
.
27.
Darbellay
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Rethinking Inter-and Transdisciplinarity: Undisciplined Knowledge and the Emergence of a New Thought Style
,”
Futures
,
65
, pp.
163
174
.
28.
Alvargonzález
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences
,”
Int. Stud. Philos. Sci.
,
25
(
4
), pp.
387
403
.
29.
Bergmann
,
M.
,
Jahn
,
T.
,
Knobloch
,
T.
,
Krohn
,
W.
, and
Pohl
,
C.
,
2012
,
Methods for Transdisciplinary Research: A Primer for Practice
,
Campus Verlag
,
Frankfurt
.
30.
Ashby
,
I.
,
Caskurlu
,
S.
, and
Exter
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Evolving Roles of Faculty at an Emerging Hybrid Competency-Based Transdisciplinary Program
,”
J. Competency-Based Educ.
,
3
(
1
), p.
e01059
.
31.
Giri
,
A. K.
,
2002
, “
The Calling of a Creative Transdisciplinarity
,”
Futures
,
34
(
1
), pp.
103
115
.
32.
Mobjörk
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Consulting Versus Participatory Transdisciplinarity: A Refined Classification of Transdisciplinary Research
,”
Futures
,
42
(
8
), pp.
866
873
.
33.
Brown
,
V. A.
,
2015
, “
Utopian Thinking and the Collective Mind: Beyond Transdisciplinarity
,”
Futures
,
65
, pp.
209
216
.
34.
Burgin
,
M.
, and
Hofkirchner
,
W.
,
2017
,
Information Studies and the Quest for Transdisciplinarity: Unity Through Diversity
, World Scientific Series in Information Studies, Vol.
9
,
World Scientific Publishing
,
Singapore
, pp.
1
560
.
35.
Nicolescu
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Methodology of Transdisciplinarity
,”
World Futures
,
70
(
3–4
), pp.
186
199
.
36.
Jahn
,
T.
, and
Keil
,
F.
,
2015
, “
An Actor-Specific Guideline for Quality Assurance in Transdisciplinary Research
,”
Futures
,
65
, pp.
195
208
.
37.
Cilliers
,
P.
, and
Nicolescu
,
B.
,
2012
, “
Complexity and Transdisciplinarity—Discontinuity, Levels of Reality and the Hidden Third
,”
Futures
,
44
(
8
), pp.
711
718
.
38.
Lawrence
,
M. G.
,
Williams
,
S.
,
Nanz
,
P.
, and
Renn
,
O.
,
2022
, “
Characteristics, Potentials, and Challenges of Transdisciplinary Research
,”
One Earth
,
5
(
1
), pp.
44
61
.
39.
Hoffmann
,
S.
,
Pohl
,
C.
, and
Hering
,
J. G.
,
2017
, “
Exploring Transdisciplinary Integration Within a Large Research Program: Empirical Lessons From Four Thematic Synthesis Processes
,”
Res. Policy
,
46
(
3
), pp.
678
692
.
40.
Defila
,
R.
, and
Di Giulio
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Integrating Knowledge: Challenges Raised by the “Inventory of Synthesis”
,”
Futures
,
65
, pp.
123
135
.
41.
Tebes
,
J. K.
,
Thai
,
N. D.
, and
Matlin
,
S. L.
,
2014
, “
Twenty-First Century Science as a Relational Process: From Eureka! to Team Science and a Place for Community Psychology
,”
Am. J. Community Psychol.
,
53
(
3–4
), pp.
475
490
.
42.
NRC
,
2015
,
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science
,
National Research Council. National Academies Press
,
New York
.
43.
Ledford
,
H.
,
2015
, “
Team Science
,”
Nature
,
525
(
7569
), pp.
308
311
.
44.
Mâsse
,
L. C.
,
Moser
,
R. P.
,
Stokols
,
D.
,
Taylor
,
B. K.
,
Marcus
,
S. E.
,
Morgan
,
G. D.
, and
Trochim
,
W. M.
,
2008
, “
Measuring Collaboration and Transdisciplinary Integration in Team Science
,”
Am. J. Prev. Med.
,
35
(
2
), pp.
S151
S160
.
45.
Boardman
,
C.
, and
Ponomariov
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Management Knowledge and the Organization of Team Science in University Research Centers
,”
J. Technol. Transfer
,
39
(
1
), pp.
75
92
.
46.
Stokols
,
D.
,
Hall
,
K. L.
,
Taylor
,
B. K.
, and
Moser
,
R. P.
,
2008
, “
The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement
,”
Am. J. Prev. Med.
,
35
(
2
), pp.
S77
S89
.
47.
Vogel
,
A. L.
,
Hall
,
K. L.
,
Fiore
,
S. M.
,
Klein
,
J. T.
,
Bennett
,
L. M.
,
Gadlin
,
H.
, and
Falk-Krzesinski
,
H. J.
,
2013
, “
The Team Science Toolkit: Enhancing Research Collaboration Through Online Knowledge Sharing
,”
Am. J. Prev. Med.
,
45
(
6
), pp.
787
789
.
48.
Yu
,
S.
,
Bedru
,
H. D.
,
Lee
,
I.
, and
Xia
,
F.
,
2019
, “
Science of Scientific Team Science: A Survey
,”
Comput. Sci. Rev.
,
31
, pp.
72
83
.
49.
Melo
,
A. T.
, and
Caves
,
L. S.
,
2020
, “Complex Systems of Knowledge Integration: A Pragmatic Proposal for Coordinating and Enhancing Inter/Transdisciplinarity,”
From Astrophysics to Unconventional Computation
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
337
362
.
50.
Osborne
,
P.
,
2015
, “
Problematizing Disciplinarity, Transdisciplinary Problematics
,”
Theory Cult. Soc.
,
32
(
5–6
), pp.
3
35
.
51.
Pohl
,
C.
,
2005
, “
Transdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research
,”
Futures
,
37
(
10
), pp.
1159
1178
.
52.
Lawrence
,
R. J.
,
2015
, “
Advances in Transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, Methodologies and Processes
,”
Futures
,
65
, pp.
1
9
.
53.
Wiek
,
A.
,
2007
, “
Challenges of Transdisciplinary Research as Interactive Knowledge Generation—Experiences From Transdisciplinary Case Study Research
,”
GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc.
,
16
(
1
), pp.
52
57
.
54.
Wiesmann
,
U.
,
Biber-Klemm
,
S.
,
Grossenbacher-Mansuy
,
W.
,
Hadorn
,
G. H.
,
Hoffmann-Riem
,
H.
,
Joye
,
D.
, and
Zemp
,
E.
,
2008
, “Enhancing Transdisciplinary Research: A Synthesis in Fifteen Propositions,”
Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research
,
Springer
,
Dordrecht
, pp.
433
441
.
55.
Tebes
,
J. K.
, and
Thai
,
N. D.
,
2018
, “
Interdisciplinary Team Science and the Public: Steps Toward a Participatory Team Science
,”
Am. Psychol.
,
73
(
4
), pp.
2
34
.
56.
Hadorn
,
G. H.
,
Biber-Klemm
,
S.
,
Grossenbacher-Mansuy
,
W.
,
Hoffmann-Riem
,
H.
,
Joye
,
D.
,
Pohl
,
C.
, and
Zemp
,
E.
,
2008
, “The Emergence of Transdisciplinarity as a Form of Research,”
Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research
,
Springer
,
Dordrecht
, pp.
19
39
.
57.
McComb
,
C.
, and
Jablokow
,
K.
,
2022
, “
A Conceptual Framework for Multidisciplinary Design Research With Example Application to Agent-Based Modeling
,”
Des. Stud.
,
78
, pp.
1
13
.
58.
Kläy
,
A.
,
Zimmermann
,
A. B.
, and
Schneider
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Rethinking Science for Sustainable Development: Reflexive Interaction for a Paradigm Transformation
,”
Futures
,
65
, pp.
72
85
.
59.
Dawson
,
R.
,
2013
, Building Success in the Future of Work: T-Shaped, Pi-Shaped, and Comb-Shaped Skills. https://rossdawson.com/building-future-success-t-shaped-pi-shaped-and-comb-shaped-skills/, Accessed January 11, 2023.
You do not currently have access to this content.