The effects of underfill selection on flip chip reliability were always a complex issue. Mechanical optimization of the underfill performance, achieved by the addition of appropriate fillers, is invariably a tradeoff between the adhesion and the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and, thus, also between in-plane and out-of-plane stresses. Another critical concern is the degradation of the underfill in processing and/or long term exposure to operating temperatures and ambient humidity. This is strongly affected by the chemical compatibility with combinations of solder mask, chip passivation, and flux residues. The latter is believed to be responsible for our observation of interactions with the solder alloy, too. As for the effects of glass transition temperatures and CTE, we find materials that were close to optimum for eutectic SnPb to be very far from the best options for lead free joints. We report on two sets of systematic experiments. The first addressed the performance of combinations of underfills, no-clean fluxes, and solder alloys in a JEDEC level 3 moisture sensitivity test. The second one involved thermal shock testing of flip chip assemblies underfilled with one of five different materials after soldering with SnCu, SAC305, and SnPb.

1.
Suryanarayana
,
D.
,
Wu
,
T. Y.
, and
Varcoe
,
J. A.
, 1993, “
Encapsulants Used in Flip-Chip Packages
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Hybrids, Manuf. Technol.
0148-6411,
16
(
8
), pp.
858
862
.
2.
Tummala
,
R. R.
,
Rymaszewski
,
E. J.
, and
Klopfenstein
,
A. G.
, 1997,
Microelectronics Packaging Handbook, Part 2: Semiconductor Packaging (Pt. 1)
,
Kluwer Academics
,
Boston
,
Chap. 8.
3.
Borgesen
,
P.
,
Blass
,
D.
, and
Srihari
,
K.
, 2000, “
Flip Chip Reliability
,”
Proceedings of APEX
, Long Beach, CA, pp.
P_AP4/2
-1–P_AP4/2-
8
.
4.
Lee
,
N. -C.
, 2002,
Reflow Soldering Processes and Trouble Shooting SMT, BGA, CSP and Flip Chip Technologies
,
Elsevier
,
Boston
, Chap. 10.
5.
Wong
,
C. P.
,
Shi
,
S. H.
, and
Jefferson
,
G.
, 1998, “
High Performance No-Flow Underfill for Low-Cost Flip-Chip Application: Part I—Materials Characterization
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon., Packag. Manuf. Technol., Part A
1070-9886,
21
, pp.
450
458
.
6.
Kondos
,
P. A.
, and
Borgesen
,
P.
, 2000, “
Flip Chip Assembly With Reflow Encapsulants
,”
Proceedings of SMTA International
, Chicago, IL.
7.
Lau
,
J. H.
,
Lee
,
S. -W. R.
, and
Chang
,
C.
, 2000, “
Effects of Underfill Material Properties on the Reliability of Solder Bumped Flip Chip on Board With Imperfect Underfill Encapsulants
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol.
1521-3331,
23
(
2
), pp.
323
333
.
8.
Puttlitz
,
K.
, and
Totta
,
P.
, 2001,
Area Array Interconnection Handbook
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Boston
, p.
464
.
9.
Tonapi
,
S. S.
,
Borgesen
,
P.
, and
Srihari
,
K.
, 2001, “
No-Pb Flip Chip Assembly-Issues and Challenges
,”
Proceedings of the 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference
, Orlando, Florida.
10.
Pacquet
,
M. -C.
,
Gaynes
,
M.
,
Duchesne
,
E.
,
Questad
,
D.
,
Belanger
,
L.
, and
Sylvestre
,
J.
, 2006, “
Underfill Selection Strategy for Pb-Free, Low-K and Fine Pitch Organic Flip Chip Applications
,”
Proceedings of the 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference
, pp.
1595
1603
.
11.
AREA Consortium Proprietary Results.
12.
Blass
,
D.
,
Meilunas
,
M.
, and
Borgesen
,
P.
, “
On the Incorporation of Fine Pitch Lead Free CSPs in High Reliability SnPb Based Microelectronics Assemblies
,”
IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag.
1521-3323, in press.
13.
Borgesen
,
P.
,
Blass
,
D.
, and
Meilunas
,
M.
, “
Effects of Corner/Edge Bonding and Underfill Properties on the Thermal Cycling Performance of Lead Free BGA Assemblies
,”
IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol.
1521-3331, submitted.
14.
Kesavakumaran
,
V.
, 2010, “
Underfill Selection Methodology for Component Underfilling Process
,” MS thesis, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY.
15.
Chaware
,
R.
,
Vichare
,
N.
,
Borgesen
,
P.
,
Blass
,
D.
, and
Srihari
,
K.
, 2004, “
Accelerated Testing of Flip Chip Underfills and the Effect of Moisture and Temperature on the Aging of Underfills
,”
Proceedings of SMTA International
, Chicago, IL.
16.
2007, “
Moisture/Reflow Sensitivity Classification for Nonhermetic Solid State Surface Mount Devices
,” IPC/JEDEC J-STD-020D Joint Industry Standard.
You do not currently have access to this content.