The behavior of unsteady velocity profiles in laminar and turbulent water hammer flows is numerically investigated. In this way, the governing equations for the quasitwo-dimensional equations of transient flow in pipe are solved by using the modified implicit characteristics method. A k-ω turbulence model which is accurate for two-dimensional boundary layers under adverse and favorable pressure gradients is applied. The numerical results for both steady and unsteady turbulent pipe flows are in good agreement with the experimental data. The results indicate that both decelerating and accelerating flows are produced in a wave cycle of water hammer. During deceleration of the flow, a region of reverse flows and also strong gradients is formed near to the pipe wall. In case of the turbulent water hammer, this region is very close to the pipe wall compared with the laminar water hammer. Moreover, point of inflection and also point of zero velocity are formed in the unsteady velocity profile due to the water hammer problem. The results show that the point of zero velocity does not move very far from its initial location, while the point of inflection moves rapidly from the wall.

1.
Silva-Araya
,
W. F.
, and
Chaudhry
,
M. H.
, 1997, “
Computation of Energy Dissipation in Transient Flow
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
0733-9429,
123
(
2
), pp.
108
115
.
2.
Ghidaoui
,
M. S.
, and
Kolyshkin
,
A. A.
, 2001, “
Stability Analysis of Velocity Profiles in Water Hammer Flows
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
0733-9429,
127
(
6
), pp.
499
512
.
3.
Wahba
,
E. M.
, 2008, “
Modelling the Attenuation of Laminar Fluid Transients in Piping systems
,”
Appl. Math. Model.
0307-904X,
32
, pp.
2863
2871
.
4.
Vardy
,
A. E.
, and
Hwang
,
K. L.
, 1991, “
A Characteristic Model of Transient Friction in Pipes
,”
J. Hydraul. Res.
0022-1686,
29
(
5
), pp.
669
685
.
5.
Zhao
,
M.
, and
Ghidaoui
,
M. S.
, 2003, “
Efficient Quasi-Two-Dimensional Model for Water Hammer Problems
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
0733-9429,
129
(
12
), pp.
1007
1013
.
6.
Drikakis
,
D.
,
Govatsos
,
P. A.
, and
Papantonis
,
D. E.
, 1994, “
A Characteristic Based Method for Incompressible Flows
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
0271-2091,
19
(
8
), pp.
667
685
.
7.
Silva-Araya
,
W. F.
, and
Chaudhry
,
M. H.
, 2001, “
Unsteady Friction in Rough pipes
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
0733-9429,
127
(
7
), pp.
607
618
.
8.
Pezzinga
,
G.
, 2000, “
Evaluation of Unsteady Flow Resistances by Quasi-2D or 1D Models
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
0733-9429,
126
(
10
), pp.
778
785
.
9.
Wahba
,
E. M.
, 2006, “
Runge-Kutta Time-Stepping Schemes With TVD Central Differencing for the Water Hammer Equations
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
0271-2091,
52
(
5
), pp.
571
590
.
10.
Zhao
,
M.
, and
Ghidaoui
,
M. S.
, 2006, “
Investigation of Turbulence Behavior in Pipe Transient Using a k-ε Model
,”
J. Hydraul. Res.
0022-1686,
44
(
5
), pp.
682
692
.
11.
Fan
,
S.
,
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
, and
Barnett
,
M.
, 1993, “
Low-Reynolds Number k-ε Model for Unsteady Turbulent Boundary Layer Flows
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
31
(
10
), pp.
1777
1784
.
12.
Drikakis
,
D.
, and
Goldberg
,
U.
, 1998, “
Wall-Distance-Free Turbulence models Applied to Incompressible Flows
,”
Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
1061-8562,
10
(
3
), pp.
241
253
.
13.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
, 1994,
Turbulence Modelling for CFD
,
DCW Industries
,
La Canada, CA
.
14.
Martinuzzi
,
R.
, and
Pollard
,
A.
, 1989, “
Comparative Study of Turbulence Models in Predicting Turbulent Pipe Flow. Part I: Algebraic Stress and k-ε Models
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
27
(
1
), pp.
29
36
.
15.
Laufer
,
J.
, 1952, “
The Structure of Turbulence in Fully Developed Pipe Flow
,” NACA Report No. 1174.
16.
Brunone
,
B.
,
Karney
,
B. W.
,
Mecarelli
,
M.
, and
Ferrante
,
M.
, 2000, “
Velocity Profiles and Unsteady Pipe Friction in Transient Flow
,”
J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.
0733-9496,
126
(
4
), pp.
236
244
.
17.
Holmboe
,
E. L.
, and
Rouleau
,
W. T.
, 1967, “
The Effect of Viscous Shear on Transients in Liquid Lines
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
89
(
1
), pp.
174
180
.
18.
Bergant
,
A.
, and
Tijsseling
,
A.
, 2001, “
Parameters Affecting Water Hammer Wave Attenuation, Shape and Timing
,”
Proceedings of the Tenth International Meeting of the IAHR Work Group on the Behaviour of Hydraulic Machinery Under Steady Oscillatory Conditions
, Trondheim, Norway, p.
12
, Paper No. C2.
19.
He
,
S.
, and
Jackson
,
J. D.
, 2000, “
A Study of Turbulence under Conditions of Transient Flow in a Pipe
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
408
, pp.
1
38
.
20.
Ghidaoui
,
M. S.
,
Mansour
,
S. G. S.
, and
Zhao
,
M.
, 2002, “
Applicability of Quasi-Steady and Axisymmetric Turbulence Models in Water Hammer
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
0733-9429,
128
(
10
), pp.
917
924
.
21.
Kucienska
,
B.
, 2004, “
Friction Relaxation Model for Fast Transient Flows
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
22.
Weinbaum
,
S.
, and
Parker
,
K. H.
, 1975, “
The Laminar Decay of Suddenly Blocked Channel and Pipe Flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
69
(
4
), pp.
729
752
.
23.
Das
,
D.
, and
Arakeri
,
J. H.
, 1998, “
Transition of Unsteady Velocity Profiles With Reverse Flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
374
, pp.
251
283
.
You do not currently have access to this content.