Extensive operational performance data from the Siemens Power Generation V64.3 unit in Obernburg, Germany (operated by Kraftwerk Obernburg GmbH) is evaluated. The unit was commissioned in 1996 and has been running continuously in base load operation with fuel gas to supply heat and power to a nearby chemical plant. In rare cases, fuel oil is used as a backup fuel. During the first major outage after approximately 25,000 equivalent operating hours (EOH), the Siemens PG Advanced Compressor Cleaning System (ACCS) was implemented at Obernburg. ACCS features separate nozzle systems for online and offline compressor cleaning accounting for different operating conditions. For online cleaning, the droplet size is optimized for the droplets to remain in the main air flow in order to minimize erosion effects while providing a homogeneous field over the whole air intake. With reduced rotational speed during offline compressor cleaning, erosion is less critical. Offline nozzles therefore provide higher mass flow and larger droplets in order to maximize cleaning performance for all compressor stages. ACCS, in its maximum automated version, features operation from the control room, online-washing at low ambient temperatures (officially released down to −15 °C without GT anti-icing) and minimum use of manpower. The ACCS system in Obernburg was operated according to the recommended online washing procedure. By June 2002, the V64.3 unit in Obernburg reached 50,000 EOH and the second major inspection was carried out. For this paper, operational data from the second inspection intervals (24,350–49,658 EOH) and from three performance tests with calibrated equipment are compared in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the advanced compressor cleaning system. Statistical evaluation of single-wash performance recovery and the evolution of long-term performance are presented. The effects of degradation and fouling are differentiated. It is shown that ACCS has a significant benefit for long-term engine performance.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Electric Power
Keywords:
compressors, cleaning, erosion, gas turbines, chemical industry
Topics:
Compressors
1.
Meher-Homji, C. B., 2000, “Compressor Fouling…Causes and Solutions,” Global Gas Turbine News, IGTI,ZZZZZZ 40(3).
2.
Diakunchak, I. S., 1991, “Performance Deterioration in Industrial Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper 91-GT-228.
3.
Adams, J., and Schmitt-Wittrock, P., 1981, “Optimierung der Reinigungsintervalle von Gasturbinenverdichtern,” Brennst.-Warme-Kraft, BRWKAY33(1).
4.
Haub, G. L., and Hauhe, W. E., 1990, “Field Evaluation of Online-Compressor Cleaning in Heavy Duty Industrial Gas Turbines,” ASME-paper 1990-GT-107.
5.
de Jong, M. P., Laagland, G. H. M., and Zeijseink, A. G. L., 2000, “Optimizing Compressor Cleaning,” Power Gen.
6.
Stalder, J.-P., 1994, “Compressor Washing Maintains Plant Performance and Reduces Cost of Energy Production,” ASME Paper 1994-GT-436.
7.
Stalder, J.-P., 1998, “Gas Turbine Compressor Washing State of the Art—Field Experiences,” ASME Paper 1998-GT-420.
8.
ISO 2314, International Standard, “Gas turbines—Acceptance Tests,” 2nd edition, 1989.
9.
Umlauft, R., and Lipiak, G., 2000, “Operating Experience and Potential After 10 Years of Siemens VX4.3 Gas Turbines,” Power Gen.
10.
KREISPR, Siemens Internal Computer-Tool for Gas Turbine Thermodynamic Cycle Calculations, current version, 2002.
11.
Traupel, W., 1988, Thermische Turbomaschinen, 3rd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
12.
Kurz, R., and Brun, K., 2000, “Degradation of Gas Turbine Systems,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-345.
13.
Zwebek, A. I., and Pilidis, P., 2001, “Degradation Effects on Combined Cycle Power Plants Performance, Part 1: Gas Turbine Cycle Component Degradation Effects,” ASME paper 2001-GT-388.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.