This paper reports the internal performance evaluation of S-duct diffusers with different entrance aspect ratios as part of a parametric investigation of a generic S-duct inlet. The generic S-duct diffusers studied had a rectangular entrance (aspect ratios of 1.5 and 2.0) transitioning S-duct diffuser in high-subsonic (Mach number > 0.8) flow. The test section was manufactured using rapid prototyping to facilitate the parametric investigation of the geometry. Streamwise static pressure and exit-plane total pressure were measured in a test-rig using surface pressure taps and a five-probe rotating rake, respectively. The baseline and a variant were simulated through computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The investigation indicated the presence of streamwise and circumferential pressure gradients leading to a three-dimensional flow in the S-duct diffuser and to distortion at the exit plane. The static pressure recovery increased for the diffuser with the higher aspect ratio. Total pressure losses and circumferential and radial distortions at the exit plane were higher than that of the podded nacelle type of inlet. An increase in the total pressure recovery was observed for the increase in the aspect ratio for the baseline area ratio (1.57) S-ducts, but without a clear trend for the other area ratio (1.8) ducts. The work represents the development of a database on the performance of a particular type of generic inlet. This database will be useful for predicting the performance of aero-engines and air vehicles in high-subsonic flight.

References

1.
Longley
,
J. P.
, and
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
1992
, “
Inlet Distortion Effects in Aircraft Propulsion System Integration
,”
Steady and Transient Performance Prediction of Gas Turbine Engines
(AGARD-LS-183),
Taylor & Francis
,
London, UK
, Chap. 6.
2.
Steenken
,
W. G.
,
1989
, “
Engine Operability
,”
Aircraft Propulsion Systems Technology and Design
(AIAA Education Series),
G. C.
Oates
, ed., American Institute of Aeronautics, Reston, VA, Chap. 6.
3.
Committee S-16
,
2002
, “
Gas Turbine Engine Inlet Flow Distortion Guidelines
,”
SAE
Paper No. ARP 1420.
4.
Goldsmith
,
E. L.
, and
Seddon
,
J.
,
1993
,
Practical Intake Aerodynamic Design
, 2nd ed. (
AIAA Education Series
),
American Institute of Aeronautics
,
Reston, VA
.
5.
Papadopoulos
,
F.
,
Valakos
,
I.
, and
Nikolos
,
I. K.
,
2012
, “
Design of an S-Duct Intake for UAV Applications
,”
Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol.
,
84
(
6
), pp.
439
456
.
6.
Whitelaw
,
J. H.
, and
Yu
,
S. C. M.
,
1993
, “
Velocity Measurement in S-Shaped Diffusing Duct
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
15
(
4
), pp.
364
367
.
7.
Saha
,
K.
,
Singh
,
S. N.
, and
Seshadri
,
V.
,
2007
, “
Computational Analysis on Flow Through Transition S-Diffusers: Effect of Inlet Shape
,”
J. Aircr.
,
44
(
1
), pp.
187
193
.
8.
Anderson
,
B. H.
,
Reddy
,
D. R.
, and
Kapoor
,
K.
,
1994
, “
Study on Computing Separating Flows Within a Diffusing Inlet S-Duct
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
10
(
5
), pp.
661
667
.
9.
Benhamza
,
M. E. H.
,
Khezzar
,
L.
, and
Marquis
,
A. J.
,
1999
, “
Flow Characteristics Inside a Diffuser of Complex Shape
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
213
(
3
), pp.
277
289
.
10.
Menzies
,
R. D. D.
,
Badcock
,
K. J.
,
Barakos
,
G. N.
, and
Richards
,
B. E.
,
2002
, “
Validation of the Simulation of Flow in an S-Duct
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2002-2808.
11.
Madani
,
V.
, and
Hynes
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Boundary Layer Ingesting Intakes: Design and Optimization
,”
18th ISABE Conference
, Montreal, QC, Canada, ISABE Paper No. 2009-1346.
12.
Asghar
,
A.
,
Stowe
,
R. A.
,
Allan
,
W. D. E.
, and
Alexander
,
D.
,
2015
, “
Performance Evaluation of an S-Duct Diffuser of a Flight-Vehicle Inlet in High-Subsonic Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-43740.
13.
Seddon
,
J.
, and
Goldsmith
,
E. L.
,
1999
, Intake Aerodynamics (AIAA Education Series),
American Institute of Aeronautics
,
Reston, VA
.
14.
Walsh
,
P. P.
, and
Fletcher
,
P.
,
2004
,
Gas Turbine Performance
, 2nd ed.,
Blackwell Scientific
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
15.
Brear
,
M. J.
,
Warfield
,
Z.
,
Mangus
,
J. F.
,
Braddom
,
C. S.
,
Paduano
,
J. D.
, and
Philhower
,
J. S.
,
2003
, “
Flow Separation Within the Engine Inlet of an Uninhabited Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV)
,”
ASME
Paper No. FEDSM2003-45579.
16.
Tournier
,
S. E.
,
Paduano
,
J. D.
, and
Pagan
,
D.
,
2005
, “
Flow Analysis and Control in a Transonic Inlet
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2005-4734.
17.
Ho
,
S. S. H.
,
1990
, “
Subsonic Intake Duct Flows
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
18.
Berrier
,
B. L.
,
Carter
,
M. B.
, and
Allan
,
B. G.
,
2005
, “
High Reynolds Number Investigation of a Flush Mounted, S-Duct Inlet With Large Amounts of Boundary Layer Ingestion
,” Hampton, VA, Report No.
NASA
/TP-2005-213766.
19.
Owens
,
L. R.
,
Allan
,
B. G.
, and
Gorton
,
S. A.
,
2008
, “
Boundary-Layer-Ingesting Inlet Flow Control
,”
J. Aircr.
,
45
(
4
), pp.
1431
1440
.
20.
Lucas
,
J. R.
,
O'Brien
,
W. F.
, and
Ferrar
,
A. M.
,
2014
, “
Effect of BLI-Type Inlet Distortion on Turbofan Engine Performance
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-2666.
21.
Freuler
,
P. N.
,
2005
, “
Boundary Layer Ingesting Inlet Design for a Silent Aircraft
,”
MS thesis
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
22.
Ferrar
,
A. M.
,
2011
, “
Measurements of Flow in Boundary Layer Ingesting Serpentine Inlets
,”
MS thesis
, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
23.
Link
,
R. A.
, and
Li
,
E. L.
,
2007
, “
Turbulence and Finite Rate Chemistry Application to Hypersonic Flows Using ChinookIMP
,” Report No. Defence R&D Canada-Valcartier CR 2007-263, Quebec City, Quebec.
24.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
2006
,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
, 3rd ed.,
DCW Industries
,
La Cañada, CA
.
25.
Harloff
,
G. J.
,
Smith
,
C. F.
,
Bruns
,
J. E.
, and
DeBonis
,
J. R.
,
1993
, “
Navier-Stokes Analysis of Three-Dimensional S-Ducts
,”
J. Aircr.
,
30
(
4
), pp.
526
533
.
26.
Tournier
,
S.
,
2005
, “
Flow Analysis and Control in a Subsonic Inlet
,”
MS thesis
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.