The use of approximate boundary conditions at the opening of the cavities leads to restriction of the computational domain and, hence, the reduction in computational effort. However, the accuracy of the restricted domain approach (RDA) had been evaluated only for the natural convection inside open cavities and that too only for one aspect ratio (AR). The validity of the approach had not been evaluated for inclined, as well as, shallow cavities. This study focuses on the analysis of the accuracy of RDA against extended domain approach (EDA) in open cavities of different ARs, at different inclinations and different Rayleigh numbers (Ra). The results show that the difference between the approaches is only significant in very shallow cavities (AR is defined as the height of the hot wall divided by the depth of the cavity) at low Ra. For Ra higher than and an AR greater than 0.2, the maximum difference between the two approaches is around 5% and hence RDA can be recommended in these ranges, resulting in increased computational efficiency without significant loss in the accuracy. Moreover, the maximum difference in the results for the two methods is for intermediate inclinations. Even there, an increase in the difference is more pronounced at lower Ra. Furthermore, distribution of the exit velocity and temperature at the opening as well as the distribution of the Nusselt number at the hot wall is compared for RDA and EDA to explain the behavior of error at different ARs and inclinations.