This paper presents a dynamic model of parallel wrists with all links constrained to have a spherical motion with the same center. The model can also be applied to serial wrists. The model, based on Lagrangian formulation of dynamics, exploits the feature that all the links have the same fixed point. Three parameters defining the platform orientation are used as generalized coordinates. This choice allows the use of the generalized inertia matrix (GIM) appearing in the model to calculate effective dynamic performance indices proposed in a previous paper. The model can solve both the direct and the inverse dynamic problems. It also contains the Jacobian matrix useful to characterize the kinematic behavior of parallel manipulators. By the model it is shown that the best performances are reached in the workspace regions where the manipulator has a good kinematic and dynamic isotropy, whereas the incidence of nonlinear forces on performances is relevant at high end-effector speed. A numerical example is provided.

1.
Asada, H., and Cro Granito, J. A., 1985, “Kinematic and Static Characterization of Wrists Joints and Their Optimal Design,” Proc. of the 1985 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Saint Louis (USA), pp. 244–250.
2.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, and
Angeles
,
J.
,
1989
The Optimum Kinematic Design of a Spherical Three-Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom., Des.
111
(
2
), pp.
202
207
.
3.
Craver, W. M., 1989, “Structural Analysis and Design of a Three-Degree-of-Freedom Robotic Shoulder Module,” Master’s Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
4.
Cox, D. J., and Tesar, D., 1989, “The Dynamic Model of a Three-Degree-of-Freedom Parallel Robotic Shoulder Module,” Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics, Columbus, Ohio (USA).
5.
Alizade
,
R. I.
,
Tagiyiev
,
N. R.
, and
Duffy
,
J.
,
1994
, “
A Forward and Reverse Displacement Analysis of an In-parallel Spherical Manipulator
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
29
(
1
), pp.
125
137
.
6.
Innocenti
,
C.
, and
Parenti-Castelli
,
V.
,
1993
, “
Echelon Form Solution of Direct Kinematics for the General Fully-Parallel Spherical Wrist
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
28
(
4
), pp.
553
561
.
7.
Vischer, P., 1995, “Argos: A Novel Parallel Spherical Structure,” Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Institut de Microtechnique, Technical Report No. 95–03.
8.
Agrawal
,
S. K.
,
Desmier
,
G.
, and
Li
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Fabrication and Analysis of a Novel 3-dof Parallel Wrist Mechanism
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
(
2A
), pp.
343
345
.
9.
Karouia, M., and Herve´, J. M., 2000, “A Three-dof Tripod for Generating Spherical Rotation,” Advances in Robot Kinematics, J. Lenarcic and M. M. Stanisic, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 395–402.
10.
Di Gregorio
,
R.
,
2001
, “
Kinematics of a New Spherical Parallel Manipulator with Three Equal Legs: The 3-URC Wrist
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
18
(
5
), pp.
213
219
.
11.
Di Gregorio
,
R.
,
2001
, “
A New Parallel Wrist Using Only Revolute Pairs: The 3-RUU Wrist
,”
Robotica
,
19
(
3
), pp.
305
309
.
12.
Miller
,
K.
, and
Clavel
,
R.
,
1992
, “
The Lagrange-based Model of Delta-4 Robot Dynamics
,”
Robotersysteme Springer-Verlag
,
8
, pp.
49
54
.
13.
Guglielmetti, P., and Longchamp, R., 1994, “A Closed Form Inverse Dynamics Model of the Delta Parallel Robot,” Proc. of the 1994 Int. Federation of Automatic Control Conference, pp. 39–44.
14.
Pierrot, F., Dauchez, P., and Fournier, A., 1991, “Hexa A Fast Six-dof Fully Parallel Robot,” Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Pisa (Italy), pp. 1158–1163.
15.
Do
,
W. Q. D.
, and
Yang
,
D. C. H.
,
1988
, “
Inverse Dynamic Analysis and Simulation of a Platform Type of Robot
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
209
227
.
16.
Tsai, K. Y., and Kohli, D., 1990, “Modified Newton-Euler Computational Scheme for Dynamic Analysis and Simulation of Parallel Manipulators With Application to Configuration Based on R-L Actuators,” Proc. of 1990 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Vol. 24, pp. 111–117.
17.
Lebret
,
G.
,
Liu
,
K.
, and
Lewis
,
F. L.
,
1993
, “
Dynamic Analysis and Control of a Stewart Platform Manipulator
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
10
(
5
), pp.
629
655
.
18.
Pang
,
H.
, and
Shahingpoor
,
M.
,
1994
, “
Inverse Dynamics of a Parallel Manipulator
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
11
(
8
), pp.
693
702
.
19.
Wang
,
J.
, and
Gosselin
,
C. M.
,
1998
, “
A New Approach for the Dynamic Analysis of Parallel Manipulators
,”
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2
, pp.
317
334
.
20.
Tsai
,
L.-W.
,
2000
, “
Solving the Inverse Dynamics of a Stewart-Gough Manipulator by the Principle of Virtual Work
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
1
), pp.
3
9
.
21.
Angeles, J., 1997, Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York (USA), p. 219.
22.
Asada
,
H.
,
1983
, “
A Geometrical Representation of Manipulator Dynamics and Its Applications to Arm Design
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
105
(
3
), pp.
131
135
.
23.
Wiens
,
G. J.
,
Scott
,
R. A.
, and
Zarrugh
,
M. Y.
,
1989
, “
The Role of Inertia Sensitivity in the Evaluation of Manipulator Performance
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
111
(
2
), pp.
194
199
.
24.
Di Gregorio, R., and Parenti-Castelli, V., 2002, “Dynamic Performance Characterization of Three-dof Parallel Manipulators,” Advances in Robot Kinematics: Theory and Applications, J. Lenarcic and F. Thomas, eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 11–20.
25.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, and
Angeles
,
J.
,
1991
, “
A Global Performance Index for the Kinematic Optimization of Robotic Manipulators
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
113
(
3
), pp.
220
226
.
26.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
,
Perreault
,
L.
, and
Vaillancourt
,
C.
,
1995
, “
Simulation and Computer-Aided Kinematic Design of Three-Degree-of-Freedom Spherical Parallel Manipulators
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
12
(
12
), pp.
857
869
.
You do not currently have access to this content.