In this work, we propose an integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty that can bring both the design objective robustness and the probabilistic design constraints into account. The fundamental development of this work is the employment of an inverse reliability strategy that uses percentile performance for assessing both the objective robustness and probabilistic constraints. The percentile formulation for objective robustness provides us an accurate evaluation of the variation of an objective performance and a probabilistic measurement of the robustness. We can obtain more reasonable compound noise combinations for a robust design objective compared to using the traditional approach proposed by Taguchi. The proposed formulation is very efficient to solve since it only needs to evaluate the constraint functions at the required reliability levels. The other major development of this work is a new search algorithm for the Most Probable Point of Inverse Reliability (MPPIR) that can be used to efficiently evaluate percentile performances for both robustness and reliability assessments. Multiple strategies are employed in the MPPIR search, including using the steepest ascent direction and an arc search. The algorithm is applicable to general non-concave and non-convex performance functions of random variables following any continuous distributions. The effectiveness of the MPPIR search algorithm is verified using example problems. Overall, an engineering example on integrated robust and reliability design of a vehicle combustion engine piston is used to illustrate the benefits of our proposed method.

1.
Taguchi, G., 1993, Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream, ASME Press, New York.
2.
Phadke, M. S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3.
Melchers, R. E., 1999, Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
4.
Chen
,
W.
,
Allen
,
J. K.
,
Mistree
,
F.
, and
Tsui
,
K.-L.
,
1996
, “
A Procedure for Robust Design: Minimizing Variations Caused by Noise Factors and Control Factors
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
18
(
4
), pp.
478
485
.
5.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
Sorensen
,
C.
, and
Pourhassan
,
N.
,
1993
, “
A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
(
1
), pp.
74
80
.
6.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2000
, “
Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
357
583
.
7.
McAllister
,
C. D.
, and
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
2003
, “
Multidisciplinary Robust Design Optimization of an Internal Combustion Engine
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
125
(
1
), pp.
124
130
.
8.
Suri
,
R.
, and
Otto
,
K.
,
2001
, “
Manufacturing System Robustness Through Integrated Modeling
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
123
(
4
), pp.
630
636
.
9.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Wiecek
,
M. M.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2000
, “
Local Approximation of the Efficient Frontier in Robust Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
232
236
.
10.
Chen
,
W.
,
Sahai
,
A.
,
Messac
,
A.
, and
Sundararaj
,
G. J.
,
2000
, “
Exploration of the Effectiveness of Physical Programming in Robust Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
155
163
.
11.
Wu
,
Y.-T.
,
Millwater
,
H. R.
, and
Cruse
,
T. A.
,
1990
, “
An Advance Probabilistic Analysis Method for Implicit Performance Function
,”
AIAA J.
,
28
(
9
), pp.
1663
1669
.
12.
Reddy
,
M. V.
,
Granhdi
,
R. V.
, and
Hopkins
,
D. A.
,
1994
, “
Reliability Based Structural Optimization: A Simplified Safety Index Approach
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
53
(
6
), pp.
1407
1418
.
13.
Wang
,
L.
,
Grandhi
,
R. V.
, and
Hopkins
,
D. A.
,
1995
, “
Structural Reliability Optimization Using An Efficient Safety Index Calculation Procedure
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
38
(
10
), pp.
171
1738
.
14.
Wu, Y.-T., and Wang, W., 1996, “A New Method for Efficient Reliability-Based Design Optimization,” Probabilistic Mechanics & Structural Reliability: Proceedings of the 7th Special Conference, pp. 274–277.
15.
Grandhi
,
R. V.
, and
Wang
,
L. P.
,
1998
, “
Reliability-Based Structural Optimization Using Improved Two-Point Adaptive Nonlinear Approximations
,”
Finite Elem. Anal. Design
,
29
(
1
), pp.
35
48
.
16.
Chen, X., and Hasselman, T. K., 1997, “Reliability Based Structural Design Optimization for Practical Applications,” 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit and AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structural Forum, Kissimmee, FL.
17.
Wu
,
Y.-T.
, and
Wang
,
W.
,
1998
, “
Efficient Probabilistic Design by Converting Reliability Constraints to Approximately Equivalent Deterministic Constraints
,”
Journal of Integrated Design and Process Sciences
,
2
(
4
), pp.
13
21
.
18.
Wu, Y.-T., Shin, Y., Sues, R., and Cesare, M., 2001, “Safety-Factor based Approach for Probabilistic-based Design optimization,” 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, Washington.
19.
Du
,
X
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2002
, “
Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design,” DETC-DAC34127, 2002
ASME J. Mech. Des
,
126
(
2
), pp.
225
233
.
20.
Wang, W., and Wu, J., 1998, “Reliability-Based Robust Design,” Proceedings of the 39th Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, AIAA-98-2052, pp. 2,956–2,964.
21.
Koch, P. N., 2002, “Probabilistic Design: Optimizing for Six Sigma Quality,” 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, AIAA-2002-1471.
22.
Der Kiureghian
,
A.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Li
,
C. C.
,
1994
, “
Inverse Reliability Problem
,”
ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics
,
120
(
5
), pp.
1150
1159
.
23.
Li
,
H.
,
Foschi
,
R. O.
,
1998
, “
An Inverse Reliability Method and Its Application
,”
Structural Safety
,
20
(
3
), pp.
257
270
.
24.
Tu
,
J.
,
Choi
,
K. K.
, and
Young
,
H. P.
,
1999
, “
A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
121
(
4
), pp.
557
564
.
25.
Chen
,
W.
,
Wiecek
,
M.
, and
Zhang
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Quality Utility: A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
121
(
2
), pp.
179
187
.
26.
Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. O., 1996, Structural Reliability Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Baffins Lane, England.
27.
Rosenblatt
,
M.
,
1952
, “
Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation
,”
Ann. Math. Stat.
,
23
, pp.
470
472
.
28.
Hasofer
,
A. M.
, and
Lind
,
N. C.
,
1974
, “
Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format
,”
Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division
,
100
(
EMI
), pp.
111
121
.
29.
Onwubiko, C. O., 1999, Introduction to Engineering Design Optimization, Prentice Hall.
30.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2001
, “
A Most Probable Point Based Method for Uncertainty Analysis
,”
Journal of Design and Manufacturing Automation
,
4
, pp.
47
66
.
31.
Youn
,
B. D.
,
Choi
,
K. K.
, and
Park
,
Y. H.
,
2003
, “
Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
125
(
2
), pp.
221
232
.
32.
de Luca, Julio Cesar, and Gerges, Samyr N. Y., 1996, “Piston Slap Excitation: Literature Review,” SAE Paper No. 962395.
33.
Hoffman, R. M., Sudjianto, A., Du, X., and Stout, J., 2003, “Robust Piston Design and Optimization Using Piston Secondary Motion Analysis,” SAE 2003 World Congress, Detroit, Michigan.
You do not currently have access to this content.