Future optical microsystems, such as microelectromechanical system (MEMS) scanners and micromirrors, will extend the resolution and sensitivity offered by their predecessors. These systems face the challenge of achieving nanometer precision subjected to various disturbances. Predicting the performance of such systems early in the design process can significantly impact the design cost and also improve the quality of the design. Our approach aims to predict the performance of such systems under various disturbance sources and develop a generalized design approach for MEMS structures. In this study, we used ANSYS for modeling and dynamic analysis of a torsional MEMS scanner mirror. ANSYS modal analysis results, which are eigenvalues (natural frequencies) and eigenvectors (mode shapes), are used to obtain the state-space representation of the mirror. The state-space model of the scanner mirror was reduced using various reduction techniques to eliminate the states that are insignificant for the transfer functions of interest. The results of these techniques were compared to obtain the best approach to obtain a lower order model that still contains all the relevant dynamics of the original model. After the model size is reduced significantly, a disturbance analysis is performed using Lyapunov approach to obtain root-mean-square values of the mirror rotation angle under the effect of a disturbance torque. The magnitude levels of the disturbance torque are obtained using an experimental procedure. The disturbance analysis framework is combined with the sensitivity analysis to determine the critical design parameters for optimizing the system performance.

1.
Clark
,
J. V.
,
Zhou
,
N.
, and
Pister
,
K. S. J.
, 1998, “
MEMS Simulation Using SUGAR v0.5
,”
Proceedings of Solid State Sensors and Actuators Workshop
, pp.
191
196
.
2.
ANSYS Release 8.1 Manual.
3.
Li
,
H.
, and
Antonsson
,
E. K.
, 1998, “
Evolutionary Techniques in MEMS Synthesis
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
,
Anaheim, CA
, Nov.
4.
Mukherjee
,
T.
, and
Fedder
,
G. K.
, 1997, “
Structured Design of Microelectromechanical Systems
,”
Proceedings of Design Automation Conference, 34th Conference on DAC’97
.
5.
Zhou
,
N.
,
Agogino
,
A.
, and
Pister
,
K. S. J.
, 2002, “
Automated Design Synthesis for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS)
,”
Proceedings of the DETC 2002: Design Automation
,
Montreal
,
Canada
.
6.
Deshpande
,
M.
, and
Saggere
,
L.
, 2005, “
Modeling and Design of an Optically Powered Microactuator for a Microfluidic Dispenser
,”
J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
127
(
4
), pp.
825
836
.
7.
Shi
,
F.
,
Ramesh
,
P.
, and
Mukherjee
,
S.
, 1995, “
Simulation Methods for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Structures (MEMS) With Application to a Microtweezer
,”
Comput. Struct.
0045-7949,
56
(
5
), pp.
769
783
.
8.
Allen
,
M.
,
Raulli
,
M.
,
Maute
,
K.
, and
Frangopol
,
D. M.
, 2004, “
Reliability-Based Analysis and Design Optimization of Electrostatically Actuated MEMS
,”
Comput. Struct.
0045-7949,
82
, pp.
1007
1020
.
9.
Sigmund
,
O.
, 2001, “
Design of Multiphysics Actuators Using Topology Optimization—Part I: One Material Structures
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
190
(
49
), pp.
6577
6604
.
10.
Lusk
,
C. P.
, and
Howell
,
L. L.
, 2006, “
Design Space of Single-Loop Planar Folded Micro Mechanisms With Out-of-Plane Motion
,”
J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
128
(
5
), pp.
1092
1100
.
11.
Ataman
,
C.
, 2004, “
Design, Modeling and Characterization of Electrostatically Actuated Microscanners
,” Master thesis, Koc University.
12.
Urey
,
H.
, and
Dickensheets
,
D. L.
, 2004,
Display and Imaging Systems
,
MOEMS and Applications
,
SPIE
,
Bellingham, WA
, Chap. 8.
13.
Shabana
,
A. A.
, 1991,
Theory of Vibration
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
, Vol.
2
.
14.
Hatch
,
M. R.
, and
Raton
,
B.
, 2001,
Vibration Simulation Using MATLAB and ANSYS
,
Chapman and Hall CRC
,
London
.
15.
Polytec Portable Digital Vibrometer, PDV 100, Manual.
16.
Urey
,
H.
,
Kan
,
C.
, and
Davis
,
W.
, 2005, “
Vibration Mode Frequency Formulae for Micromechanical Scanners
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
0960-1317,
15
, pp.
1713
1721
.
17.
Millonas
,
M. M.
, 1994, “
Transport and Current Reversal in Stochastically Driven Ratchets
,”
Phys. Lett. A
0375-9601,
185
(
1
), pp.
65
69
.
18.
Gaji’c
,
Z.
, and
Qureshi
,
M. T. J.
, 1995,
Lyapunov Matrix Equation in System Stability and Control
,
Academic Press
,
San Diego
.
19.
Gutierrez
,
H. L.
, 1999, “
Performance Assessment and Enhancement of Precision Controlled Structures During Conceptual Design
,” Ph.D thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
20.
Fox
,
R. L.
, and
Kapoor
,
M. P.
, 1968, “
Rates of Change of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
6
, pp.
2426
2429
.
21.
Nelson
,
R. B.
, 1976, “
Simplified Calculations of Eigenvector Derivatives
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
14
, pp.
1201
1205
.
You do not currently have access to this content.