A common objective in designing for human variability is to consider the variability in body size and shape of the target user population. Since anthropometric data specific to the user population of interest are seldom available, the variability is approximated. This is done in a number of ways, including the use of data from populations that are well-documented (e.g., the military), proportionality constants, and digital human models. These approaches have specific limitations, including a failure to consider the effects of lifestyle and demography, resulting in products, tasks, and environments that are inappropriately sized for the actual user population, causing problems with safety, fit, and performance. This paper explores a regression-based approach in a context where the demographic distributions of descriptors (e.g., race/ethnicity, age, and fitness) are dissimilar for the database and target population. Also examined is a stratified regression model involving the development of independent anthropometry-estimation models for each racial group. When using regression with residual variance, stratification on the predictor demographics to obtain estimates of gender, stature, and BMI distributions is shown to be sufficiently robust for usual database-target population combinations. Consideration of demographic variables in development of the regression model provides marginal improvement, but could be appropriate in specific situations.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: gzn103@psu.edu
e-mail: parkinson@psu.edu
Article navigation
February 2010
Research Papers
Consideration of Demographics and Variance in Regression Approaches to Estimating Body Dimensions for Spatial Analysis of Design
Gopal Nadadur,
Gopal Nadadur
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: gzn103@psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University
, University Park, PA 16802
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew B. Parkinson
Matthew B. Parkinson
Engineering Design Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: parkinson@psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University
, University Park, PA 16802
Search for other works by this author on:
Gopal Nadadur
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Pennsylvania State University
, University Park, PA 16802e-mail: gzn103@psu.edu
Matthew B. Parkinson
Engineering Design Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Pennsylvania State University
, University Park, PA 16802e-mail: parkinson@psu.edu
J. Mech. Des. Feb 2010, 132(2): 021007 (8 pages)
Published Online: January 26, 2010
Article history
Received:
March 7, 2009
Revised:
December 1, 2009
Published:
January 26, 2010
Citation
Nadadur, G., and Parkinson, M. B. (January 26, 2010). "Consideration of Demographics and Variance in Regression Approaches to Estimating Body Dimensions for Spatial Analysis of Design." ASME. J. Mech. Des. February 2010; 132(2): 021007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000831
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Reviewer’s Recognition
J. Mech. Des (May 2025)
Heterogeneous Multi-Source Data Fusion Through Input Mapping and Latent Variable Gaussian Process
J. Mech. Des (April 2025)
Design, Analysis, and Experimental Evaluation of a New Expansion Screw Using Compliant Mechanisms
J. Mech. Des (September 2025)
Design of a 6-DOF Heavy-Duty and High-Precision 3–3 Orthogonal Parallel Robot With Flexible Hinges
J. Mech. Des (September 2025)
Related Articles
Including Preference in Anthropometry-Driven Models for Design
J. Mech. Des (October,2009)
Improved Accuracy Models For Hourly Diffuse Solar Radiation
J. Sol. Energy Eng (February,2006)
A Mathematical Model Design for Pu Content Analyzed by 244 Cm in Spent Fuel of Fast Reactors
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (July,2025)
Warpage Analysis of Underfilled Wafers
J. Electron. Packag (June,2004)
Related Chapters
An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of IPO Underpricing
International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science, 3rd (ITCS 2011)
Recognition of Emotions from Human Speech
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 20
Anthropometric Fit Testing and Evaluation
Performance of Protective Clothing