Abstract

Design for repairability is an important design practice to increase the useful life of consumer products and decrease environmental impact. The current design for repairability guidelines includes general practices that can be applied to a range of products across industries. However, these guidelines lack device-specific insights. This work consists of two complementary studies aimed at advancing design for repairability. The first study proposes a methodology for extracting repairability design insights from online product reviews. This would help repair-conscious designers identify device components that may need redesign and/or prioritize components to offer as replacement parts. In this study, topic modeling is performed on the product reviews with nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) and BERTopic to identify topics regarding device failure modes for computer keyboards. While BERTopic produced more cohesive topics with fewer duplicates, NMF generated more incoherent topics. The proposed method identified several failure modes for computer keyboards, such as sticky keys, keyboard leg breakage, and instability in the keyboard base. The second study presents a case study on developing and applying a novel repairability score based on failure modes identified from online product reviews. This new method differs from existing approaches as it relies on real device failures compared to scores based on theoretical device failure modes. The study reveals that the repairability scores of the keyboards varied, primarily depending on the availability of repair instructions and replacement parts for addressing their specific failures. This suggests that providing targeted repair solutions for individual device failures can improve their repairability.

References

1.
Kim
,
K. Y.
,
Haapala
,
K. R.
,
Okudan Kremer
,
G. E.
,
Murat
,
E. A.
,
Chinnam
,
R. B.
, and
Monplaisir
,
L. F.
,
2012
, “
A Conceptual Framework for a Sustainable Product Development Collaboratory to Support Integrated Sustainable Design and Manufacturing
,”
ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Washington, DC
,
Aug. 28–31
, 2011, pp.
1097
1103
.
2.
Singh
,
N.
, and
Oguneseitan
,
O. A.
,
2022
, “
Disentangling the Worldwide Web of e-Waste and Climate Change Co-Benefits
,”
Circ. Econ.
,
1
(
2
), p.
100011
.
3.
iFixit
, “
The Problem With E-Waste—iFixit
,” https://www.ifixit.com/Right-to-Repair/E-waste, Accessed February 7, 2024.
4.
EPA
, “Cleaning Up Electronic Waste (E-Waste),” https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/cleaning-electronic-waste-e-waste, Accessed February 7, 2024.
5.
Wilson Center
, “
The DRC Mining Industry: Child Labor and Formalization of Small-Scale Mining
,” https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/drc-mining-industry-child-labor-and-formalization-small-scale-mining, Accessed February 7, 2024.
6.
iFixit
, “
Gold Standard
,” https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/gold-standard, Accessed February 7, 2024.
7.
Ozturkcan
,
S.
,
2023
, “
The Right-to-Repair Movement: Sustainability and Consumer Rights
,”
J. Inf. Technol. Teach. Cases
,
14
(
2
), p.
20438869231178037
.
8.
NCSL
, “
Right to Repair
,” PIRG, https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/right-to-repair-2023-legislation, Accessed March 5, 2024.
9.
NCSL
, “
Right to Repair 2023 Legislation
,” https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/right-to-repair-2023-legislation, Accessed March 5, 2024.
10.
iFixit
, “
How Is the iFixit Repairability Score Calculated?
,” https://www.ifixit.com/News/75533/how-ifixit-scores-repairability, Accessed February 9, 2024.
11.
Rai
,
R.
,
Tekunoff
,
U.
,
Schafer
,
C.
,
Sandborn
,
P.
, and
Terpenny
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Mitigating E-Waste: A Product Service System (PSS) Based Design Approach to Create Obsolescence Resistant Products
,”
ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
,
Aug. 15–18
, pp.
155
169
.
12.
Kwak
,
M.
,
Behdad
,
S.
,
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Thurston
,
D.
,
2011
, “
E-Waste Stream Analysis and Design Implications
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
133
(
10
), p.
101003
.
13.
LinkedIn
, “
Right to Repair: 6 Design for Repairability Principles
,” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/right-repair-6-design-repairability-principles-tony-elkington/, Accessed February 9, 2024.
14.
Rodríguez
,
N. B.
, and
Favi
,
C.
,
2022
, “
Eco-Design Guidelines Takeaways From the Analysis of Product Repairability and Ease of Disassembly: A Case Study for Electric Ovens
,”
The 29th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering
,
Lueven, Belgium
,
Apr. 4–6
.
15.
Boix Rodríguez
,
N.
, and
Favi
,
C.
,
2024
, “
Disassembly and Repairability of Mechatronic Products: Insight for Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
146
(
2
), p.
020906
.
16.
Sabbaghi
,
M.
, and
Behdad
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer’s Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
139
(
8
), p.
081701
.
17.
Terzioğlu
,
N.
,
2021
, “
Repair Motivation and Barriers Model: Investigating User Perspectives Related to Product Repair Towards a Circular Economy
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
289
, p.
125644
.
18.
Liao
,
H.
,
Boregowda
,
K.
,
Cade
,
W.
, and
Behdad
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Machine Learning to Predict Medical Devices Repair and Maintenance Needs
,”
ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual, Online
,
Aug. 17–19
, p. V005T05A012.
19.
Liao
,
H.
,
Cade
,
W.
, and
Behdad
,
S.
,
2022
, “
Forecasting Repair and Maintenance Services of Medical Devices Using Support Vector Machine
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
144
(
3
), p.
031005
.
20.
Flipsen
,
B.
,
Huisken
,
M.
,
Opsomer
,
T.
, and
Depypere
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Smartphone Reparability Scoring: Assessing the Self-Repair Potential of Mobile ICT Devices
,”
Proceedings of the PLATE 2019
,
Berlin, Germany
,
Sept. 18–20
.
21.
Dangal
,
S.
,
Faludi
,
J.
, and
Balkenende
,
R.
,
2022
, “
Design Aspects in Repairability Scoring Systems: Comparing Their Objectivity and Completeness
,”
Sustainability
,
14
(
14
), p.
8634
.
22.
Ruiz-Pastor
,
L.
, and
Mesa
,
J. A.
,
2023
, “
Proposing an Integrated Indicator to Measure Product Repairability
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
395
, p.
136434
.
23.
Alkouh
,
A.
,
Keddar
,
K. A.
, and
Alatefi
,
S.
,
2023
, “
Revolutionizing Repairability of Industrial Electronics in Oil and Gas Sector: A Mathematical Model for the Index of Repairability (IOR) as a Novel Technique
,”
Electronics
,
12
(
11
), p.
2461
.
24.
Rodriguez
,
N. B.
,
Chiastra
,
L.
,
Peeters
,
J. R.
, and
Favi
,
C.
,
2024
, “
Analysis of Repairability Index to Improve Disassemblability and Serviceability in Cooker Hoods
,”
31st CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering
,
Turin, Italy
,
June 19–21
.
25.
Saidani
,
M.
,
Kim
,
A.
, and
Kim
,
M.
,
2023
, “
The Right-to-Repair Movement and Sustainable Design Implications: A Focus on Three Industrial Sectors
,”
Proceedings of the Design Society
,
Bordeaux, France
,
July 24–28
, pp.
3463
3472
.
26.
L'indice de réparabilité,
“Indice de réparabilité Smartphone,” https://www.indicereparabilite.fr/appareils/multimedia/smartphone, Accessed Nov. 19, 2024.
27.
Cavillot
,
J.
,
2023
,
The French Repairability Index: Feedback From the Repair Community
,
Louvain School of Management, Université catholique de Louvain
,
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
.
28.
Barros
,
M.
, and
Dimla
,
E.
,
2023
, “
Smartphone Repairability Indexes in Practice: Linking Repair Scores to Industrial Design Features
,”
J. Ind. Ecol.
,
27
(
3
), pp.
923
936
.
29.
British Standard Institute
,
2020
,
BS EN 45554:2020 General Methods for the Assessment of the Ability to Repair, Reuse and Upgrade Energy-Related Products
,
British Standard Institute
.
30.
Cordella
,
M.
,
Alfieri
,
F.
, and
Sanfelix Forner
,
J.
,
2019
,
Analysis and development of a scoring system for repair and upgrade of products
,
Publications Office of the European Union
,
Luxembourg
.
31.
El Dehaibi
,
N.
,
Goodman
,
N. D.
, and
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
2019
, “
Extracting Customer Perceptions of Product Sustainability From Online Reviews
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
12
), p.
121103
.
32.
Zhou
,
F.
,
Jiao
,
R.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2015
, “
Latent Customer Needs Elicitation by Use Case Analogical Reasoning From Sentiment Analysis of Online Product Reviews
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
7
), p.
071401
.
33.
Song
,
H.
, and
Fu
,
K.
,
2022
, “
Design-by-Analogy: Effects of Exploration-Based Approach on Analogical Retrievals and Design Outcomes
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
144
(
6
), p.
061401
.
34.
Park
,
S.
, and
Kim
,
M. H.
,
2022
, “
Finding Social Networks Among Online Reviewers for Customer Segmentation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
144
(
12
), p.
121703
.
35.
Egger
,
R.
, and
Yu
,
J.
,
2022
, “
A Topic Modeling Comparison Between LDA, NMF, Top2Vec, and BERTopic to Demystify Twitter Posts
,”
Front. Sociol.
,
7
, p.
886498
.
36.
Paatero
,
P.
, and
Tapper
,
U.
,
1994
, “
Positive Matrix Factorization: A Non-Negative Factor Model With Optimal Utilization of Error Estimates of Data Values
,”
Environmetrics
,
5
(
2
), pp.
111
126
.
37.
Lee
,
D. D.
, and
Seung
,
H. S.
,
1999
, “
Learning the Parts of Objects by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
,”
Nature
,
401
, pp.
788
791
.
38.
Pauca
,
V. P.
,
Shahnaz
,
F.
,
Berry
,
M. W.
, and
Plemmons
,
R. J.
,
2004
, “
Text Mining Using Non-Negative Matrix Factorizations
,”
2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM)
,
Lake Buena Vista, FL
,
Apr. 22–24
, pp.
452
456
.
39.
Xu
,
W.
,
Liu
,
X.
, and
Gong
,
Y.
,
2003
, “
Document Clustering Based on Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
,”
26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval
,
Toronto, Canada
,
July 28–Aug. 1
, pp.
267
273
.
40.
Grootendorst
,
M.
,
2022
, “
BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure
,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794
. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05794
41.
Saidani
,
M.
,
Kim
,
H.
,
Ayadhi
,
N.
, and
Yannou
,
B.
,
2021
, “
Can Online Customer Reviews Help Design More Sustainable Products? A Preliminary Study on Amazon Climate Pledge Friendly Products
,”
ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual, Online
,
Aug. 17–19
, p. V006T06A002.
42.
Saidani
,
M.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Yannou
,
B.
,
2021
, “
Can Machine Learning Tools Support the Identification of Sustainable Design Leads From Product Reviews? Opportunities and Challenges
,”
ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual, Online
,
Aug. 17–19
p. V03AT03A005.
43.
Saidani
,
M.
,
Joung
,
J.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Yannou
,
B.
,
2022
, “
Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Online Customer Reviews to Design More Sustainable Products—Case Study on a Printing Machine
,”
Procedia CIRP
,
109
, pp.
604
609
.
44.
Andrade
,
S. R.
, and
Walsh
,
H. S.
,
2022
, “
Discovering a Failure Taxonomy for Early Design of Complex Engineered Systems Using Natural Language Processing
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
23
(
3
), p.
031001
.
45.
The Open Repair AllianceFull Open Repair Data Dataset
,
2024
, https://openrepair.org/open-data
46.
M.
Haeussermann
, “The EU's Take on “Right to Repair” Hs Finally Been Approved,” https://www.ifixit.com/News/94705/the-eus-right-to-repair-has-finally-been-approved, Accessed November 19, 2024.
47.
Garcia
,
D.
, and
Schweitzer
,
F.
,
2011
, “
Emotions in Product Reviews–Empirics and Models
,”
presented at the 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing
,
Boston, MA
,
Oct. 9–11
.
48.
Murshed
,
B. A. H.
,
Mallappa
,
S.
,
Abawajy
,
J.
,
Saif
,
M. A. N.
,
Al-ariki
,
H. D. E.
, and
Abdulwahab
,
H. M.
,
2023
, “
Short Text Topic Modelling Approaches in the Context of big Data: Taxonomy, Survey, and Analysis
,”
Artif. Intell. Rev.
,
56
(
6
), pp.
5133
5260
.
49.
Saidani
,
M.
, and
Kim
,
H.
,
2021
, “
Design for Product Circularity: Circular Economy Indicators With Tools Mapped Along the Engineering Design Process
,”
ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual, Online
,
Aug. 17–19
, p. V005T05A008.
50.
Cong
,
L.
,
Zhao
,
F.
, and
Sutherland
,
J. W.
,
2019
, “
A Design Method to Improve End-of-Use Product Value Recovery for Circular Economy
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
4
), p.
044502
.
51.
Camburn
,
B.
,
He
,
Y.
,
Raviselvam
,
S.
,
Luo
,
J.
, and
Wood
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Machine Learning-Based Design Concept Evaluation
,”
ASME. J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
3
), p.
031113
.
52.
Selva
,
D.
, and
Crawley
,
E. F.
,
2013
, “
VASSAR: Value Assessment of System Architectures Using Rules
,”
2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference
,
Big Sky, MT
,
Mar. 2–9
.
You do not currently have access to this content.