A challenge is always presented when attempting to measure the pain an individual patient experiences. Unfortunately, present technologies rely nearly exclusively on subjective techniques. Using these current techniques, a physician may use a manually operated algometer and a series of questionnaires to gauge an individual patient’s pain scale. Unfortunately these devices and test methods have been suggested to introduce error due to variability and inconsistent testing methods. Some studies have shown large variability, while others have shown minimal variability, both between patients and within the same patient during multiple testing sessions. Recent studies have also shown a lack of correlation between pain threshold and pain tolerance in pain sensitivity tests. Hand-held algometer devices can be difficult to maintain consistent application rates over multiple test periods, possibly adding to widespread variability. Furthermore, there are limited test results that correlate pain ratings with biological measures in real time. The computer-controlled pressure algometer described is not hand-held or dependent on significant examiner input. This new device is capable of recording electrocardiograph (ECG), blood pressure (BP), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and pressure pain tolerance (PPTol) in real time. One major goal is the capability of correlating pain stimuli with algometer pressure, heart rate, and blood pressure. If a predictable correlation between vital signs and pain could be established, significant gains in the understanding of pain could result. Better understanding of pain will ultimately lead to improvements in treatment and diagnosis of pain conditions, helping patients and physicians alike.

References

1.
Merskey
,
H.
, 1994, “
Logic, Truth and Language in Concepts of Pain
,”
Quality of Life Research
,
3
, pp.
S69
S76
.
2.
Gatchel
,
R.
, 2004, “
Comorbidity of Chronic Pain and Mental Health Disorders: The Biopsychosocial Perspective
,”
American Psychologist
,
59
, pp.
795
805
.
3.
Dagenais
,
S.
,
Caro
,
J.
, and
Haldeman
,
S.
, 2008, “
A Systematic Review of Low Back Pain Cost of Illness Studies in the United States and Internationally
,”
Spine Journal
,
8
, pp.
8
20
.
4.
Lippe
,
P. M.
, 2000, “
The Decade of Pain Control and Research
,”
Pain Medicine
,
1
, pp.
286
286
.
5.
Phillips
,
D. M.
, 2000, “
JCAHO Pain Management Standards Are Unveiled
,”
JAMA
,
284
, pp.
428
429
.
6.
Huskisson
,
E. C.
, 1974, “
Measurement of Pain
,”
The Lancet
,
304
, pp.
1127
1131
.
7.
Ylinen
,
J.
, 2007, “
Pressure Algometry - Commentary
,”
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
,
53
, pp.
207
207
.
8.
Edwards
,
R.
, and
Fillingim
,
R.
, 2007, “
Self-Reported Pain Sensitivity: Lack of Correlation With Pain Threshold and Tolerance
,”
European Journal of Pain
,
11
, pp.
594
598
.
9.
Ohnhaus
,
E.
, and
Adler
,
R.
, 1975, “
Methodological Problems in Measurement of Pain—Comparison Between Verbal Rating Scales and Visual Analog Scale
,”
Pain
,
1
, pp.
379
384
.
10.
Bieri
,
D.
,
Reeve
,
R.
,
Champion
,
G.
,
Addicoat
,
L.
, and
Ziegler
,
J.
, 1990, “
The Faces Pain Scale for the Self-Assessment of the Severity of Pain Experienced by Children—Development, Initial Validation, and Preliminary Investigation for Ratio Scale Properties
,”
Pain
,
41
, pp.
139
150
.
11.
Vatine
,
J.
,
Shapira
,
S.
,
Magora
,
F.
,
Adler
,
D.
, and
Magora
,
A.
, 1993, “
Electronic Pressure Algometry of Deep Pain in Healthy-Volunteers
,”
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
,
74
, pp.
526
530
.
12.
Polianskis
,
R.
,
Graven-Nielsen
,
T.
, and
Arendt-Nielsen
,
L.
, 2001, “
Computer-Controlled Pneumatic Pressure Algometry—A New Technique for Quantitative Sensory Testing
,”
European Journal of Pain-London
,
5
, pp.
267
277
.
13.
Jespersen
,
A.
,
Dreyer
,
L.
,
Kendall
,
S.
,
Graven-Nielsen
,
T.
,
Arendt-Nielsen
,
L.
,
Bliddal
,
H.
, and
Danneskiold-Samsoe
,
B.
, 2007, “
Computerized Cuff Pressure Algometry: A New Method to Assess Deep-Tissue Hypersensitivity in Fibromyalgia
,”
PAIN
,
131
, pp.
57
62
.
14.
Stohler
,
C.
, and
Ashton-Miller
,
J.
, 2007, “
Servo-Controlled Stepped and Ramped Mechanical Tissue Algometry
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
,
40
, pp.
1635
1640
.
15.
Bernhardt
,
O.
,
Schiffman
,
E.
, and
Look
,
J.
, 2007, “
Reliability and Validity of a New Fingertip-Shaped Pressure Algometer for Assessing Pressure Pain Thresholds in the Temporomandibular Joint and Masticatory Muscles
,”
Journal of Orofacial Pain
,
21
, pp.
29
38
.
16.
Zamir
,
N.
, and
Segal
,
M.
, 1979, “
Hypertension-Induced Analgesia: Changes in Pain Sensitivity in Experimental Hypertensive Rats
,”
Brain Research
,
160
, pp.
170
173
.
17.
Zamir
,
N.
, and
Shuber
,
E.
, 1980, “
Altered Pain Perception in Hypertensive Humans
,”
Brain Research
,
201
, pp.
471
474
.
18.
Duschek
,
S.
,
Dietel
,
A.
,
Schandry
,
R.
, and
del Paso
,
G.
, 2009, “
Increased Sensitivity to Heat Pain in Chronic Low Blood Pressure
,”
European Journal of Pain
,
13
, pp.
28
34
.
19.
Bruehl
,
S.
,
Chung
,
O. Y.
,
Jirjis
,
J. N.
, and
Biridepalli
,
S.
, 2005, “
Prevalence of Clinical Hypertension in Patients with Chronic Pain Compared to Nonpain General Medical Patients
,”
The Clinical Journal of Pain
,
21
, pp.
147
153
.
20.
Camm
,
A.
,
Malik
,
M.
,
Bigger
,
J.
,
Breithardt
,
G.
,
Cerutti
,
S.
,
Cohen
,
R.
,
Coumel
,
P.
,
Fallen
,
E.
,
Kennedy
,
H.
,
Kleiger
,
R.
,
Lombardi
,
F.
,
Malliani
,
A.
,
Moss
,
A.
,
Rottman
,
J.
,
Schmidt
,
G.
,
Schwartz
,
P.
, and
Singer
,
D.
, 1996, “
Heart Rate Variability—Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use
,”
Circulation
,
93
, pp.
1043
1065
.
21.
Tousignant-Laflamme
,
Y.
, and
Marchand
,
S.
, 2006, “
Sex Differences in Cardiac and Autonomic Response to Clinical and Experimental Pain in LBP Patients
,”
European Journal of Pain
,
10
, pp.
603
614
.
You do not currently have access to this content.