Abstract

This paper reviews some of the major challenges in requalification and rehabilitation of offshore platforms. Main emphasis is put on requalification needs, acceptance criteria, and methods. This review is also applied to the decommissioning phase of older platforms. Finally, some important requalification projects are reviewed with emphasis on rehabilitation needs. [S0892-7219(00)00501-X]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
structural engineering, oil technology, natural gas technology, marine vehicles, failure analysis
Topics:
Acceptance criteria, Damage, Design, Offshore platforms, Safety, Concretes, Gulf of Mexico, North Sea, Manufacturing, Seas, Risk, Inspection, Offshore structures
1.
Perreau, M. E., 1993, “Jernieh Gas Project Challenges and Implementation Performance,” Proceedings, Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference Soc. of Petroleum Engineers, Singapore, pp. 13–48.
2.
Jakobsen, B., 1992, “The Loss of the Sleipner A Platform,” Proceedings, Second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, (ISOPE), San Fransisco, CA.
3.
American Petroleum Institute (API), 1995, “Proposed Revisions to RP 2A-WSD Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed offshore Platforms—Assessment of Existing Platforms, Draft Section 17,” Dallas, TX, Nov.
4.
Dunlap, W. A., and Ibbs, W. C., 1993, Proceedings of International Workshop on “Assessment and Requalification of Offshore Production Structures,” New Orleans, LA, Dec.
5.
Efthymiou, M., van de Graaf, J. W., and Tromans, P. S., 1996, “Reliability-Based Criteria for Fixed Steel Offshore Platforms,” Proceedings 15th Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE) Vol I-A, pp. 129–141. 1 June, Florence Italy.
6.
Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD), 1995, “Acts, Regulations and Provisions for the Petroleum Activity,” Stavanger, Norway
7.
Arney, C. E., 1998, “Reliability and Risk Considerations in Offshore Design and Operations,” Ocean Waves Kinematics, Dynamics and Loads on Structures, Zhang, J., ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, May, pp. 265–272.
8.
Rettedal, W. K., and Gudmestad, O. T., 1995, “Acceptance Criteria for Risk in Offshore Construction Projects,” Proceedings, Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark, OMAE Vol. I-B, pp. 67–75.
9.
Comite´ Europe´an de Normalization (CEN), 1994–1998, “Eurocode 8—Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures,” ENV 1998, Bruxelles, Belgium.
10.
Dalane, J. I., and Haver, S., 1995, “Requalification of an Unmanned Jacket Structure Using Reliability Methods,” Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 7756, Houston, TX, May.
11.
Bea, R. G., Suhayda, R., Jin, Z., and Ramos, R., 1998, “Hurricane Wave Conditions for Design and Requalification of Platforms in the Bay of Campeche, Mexico,” Ocean Wave Kinematics, Dynamics and Loads on Structures, Zhang, J., ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, May, pp. 257–264.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.