The paper presents in detail the experimental and numerical investigations on tubular joints that are stiffened internally with three annular rings in order to study their behaviors and evaluate their strengths under axial brace compression loading. The nominal chord and brace diameters of the tested T and Y-joints were 324 and 219 mm and their thicknesses were 12 and 8 mm, respectively. The tested joints are approximately quarter-size when compared to the largest joints in the platforms built in a shallow water depth of 80 m in the Bombay High field. Some of the joints were actually fabricated by a leading offshore agency that is directly involved in the fabrication of prototype structures. Bending of the chord as a whole was observed to be the predominant mode of deformation of the internally ring-stiffened joints in contrast to ovaling and punching shear of the unstiffened joints. Strengths of the internally ring-stiffened joints were found to be almost twice that of unstiffened joints of the same dimensions. A tri-linear stress-strain model that takes into account the strain-hardening characteristics of the material was developed to assess the strength of the internally ring-stiffened joints. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to predict the bending deflection of the internally ring-stiffened joints under axial brace compression loading. This FEA used NISA II software package and was based on the tri-linear model proposed in this study. [S0892-7219(00)00104-7]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
mechanical engineering, mechanical testing, finite element analysis, bending strength, Offshore Platforms, Tubular Joints, Internally Ring-Stiffened, Unstiffened, Testing, Analytical Model, Finite Element Analysis
Topics:
Bracing (Construction), Chords (Trusses), Deflection, Finite element analysis, Offshore platforms, Stress, Tubular joints, Deformation, Dimensions
1.
Chen, W. J., and Han, D. J., 1985, Tubular Members in Offshore Structures, Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston, MA.
2.
Digre, K. A., Krieger, W., Wisch, D. J., and Petrauskas, C., 1994, “API RP 2A Draft Section 17 Assessment of Existing Platforms,” Behavior of Offshore Structures, BOSS ’94, Chryssostomidis, C., et al., eds., Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 467–478.
3.
UEG, 1985, Design of Tubular Joints for Offshore Structures, Under Water Engineering Group, London, UK.
4.
Bozhen
,
C.
,
1990
, “
Stress Analysis of Ring Stiffened Tubular Joints for Offshore Structures-Review of Studies in China
,”
China Ocean Eng.
4
, pp.
1
–
12
.
5.
Sawada, Y., Idogaki, S., and Sekita, K., 1979, “Static and Fatigue Tests on T Joints Stiffened by an Internal Ring,” Proc., 11th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, pp. 563–572.
6.
Graff, W. J., 1981, Introduction to Offshore Structures, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX.
7.
Shiyekar
,
M. R.
,
Kalani
,
M.
, and
Belkune
,
R. M.
,
1983
, “
Stresses in Stiffened Tubular T Joint of an Offshore Structure
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
105
, pp.
177
–
183
.
8.
UEG, 1985, Design of Tubular Joints for Offshore Structures, Under Water Engineering Group, London, UK.
9.
UEG, 1985, Design of Tubular Joints for Offshore Structures, Under Water Engineering Group, London, UK.
10.
Lalani, M., Tebett, I. E., and Choo, B. S., 1986, “Improved Fatigue Life Estimation of Tubular Joints,” Proc., 18th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, pp. 133–146.
11.
Shiyekar, M. R., and Kalani, M., 1983, “Stresses in Ring Stiffened Tubular Y Joints under Axial and In-plane Moment Loadings,” Proc., Second International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Symposium, pp. 258–265.
12.
Ramachandra Murthy, D. S., Madhava Rao, A. G., Gandhi, P., Thandavamoorthy, T. S., Pant, P. K., and Murthy, V. S. R., 1991, “Analytical and Experimental Investigations on Internally Ring Stiffened Steel Tubular Joints,” Fatigue and Fracture in Steel and Concrete Structures, Madhava Rao, A. G., and Appa Rao, T. V. S. R., eds., Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt., Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp. 715–728.
13.
Nwosu
,
D. I.
,
Swamidas
,
A. S. J.
,
Munaswami
,
K.
,
1995
, “
Numerical Stress Analysis of Internal Ring Stiffened Tubular T-Joints
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
117
, pp.
113
–
125
.
14.
Wimpey Offshore, 1991, “In-service Database for Ring-Stiffened Tubular Joints,” Report No. WOL 035/91, Wimpey Offshore Ltd., London, UK.
15.
Tahan, N., Chols, N. W. N., Sharp, T. V., and Ma, S. Y. A., 1992, “Uncertainties Associated with the Behavior of Ring-Stiffened Joints Derived from an In-service Database,” Behavior of Offshore Structures, BOSS ’92, Patel, M. H., and Gibbins, R., eds., BPP Technical Services, London, UK, Supplement.
16.
API RP 2A-LRFD, 1993, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Load and Resistant Factor Design, American Petroleum Institute, Washington DC.
17.
IS: 226, 1975, Indian Standard Specification for Structural Steel (Standard Quality), Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi, India.
18.
Kekre
,
S. Y.
,
1994
, “
Engineering and Construction Division of ONGC Bombay—A Vision for Globalisation
,”
Oil Asia J.
,
15
, Petrotech ’95 Special, pp.
90
–
94
.
19.
Thandavamoorthy, T. S., 1998, “Assessment and Rehabilitation of Damaged Steel Offshore Structures,” Ph.D. thesis, Anna University, Chennai, India.
20.
Kothawala, K. S., 1991, NISA II User’s Manual, Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation, Troy, NY.
21.
Yamasaki, T., Takizawa, S., and Komatsu, M., 1979, “Static and Fatigue Tests on Large-Size Tubular T-Joints,” Proc., 11th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, pp. 583–591.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.