Two separate studies are presented here that deal with analytical predictions of the air gap for floating structures. 1) To obtain an understanding of the importance of first and second-order incident and diffracted wave effects as well as to determine the influence of the structure’s motions on the instantaneous air gap, statistics of the air gap response are studied under various modeling assumptions. For these detailed studies, a single field point is studied here—one at the geometric center (in plan) of the Troll semi-submersible. 2) A comparison of the air gap at different locations is studied by examining response statistics at different field points for the semi-submersible. These include locations close to columns of the four-columned semi-submersible. Analytical predictions, including first and second-order diffracted wave effects, are compared with wave tank measurements at several locations. In particular, the gross root-mean-square response and the 3-h extreme response are compared.

1.
Winterstein, S. R., and Sweetman, B., 1999, “Air Gap Response of Floating Structures: Statistical Predictions vs Observed Behavior,” Proc. ASME Paper No. OMAE 99-6042.
2.
WAMIT, 4.0, 1995, “WAMIT: A Radiation-Diffraction Panel Program for Wave-Body Interaction—Users’ Manual,” Department of Ocean Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.
3.
Naess
,
A.
,
1986
, “
The Statistical Distribution of Second-Order Slowly Varying Forces and Motions
,”
Appl. Ocean. Res.
,
8
, pp.
110
118
.
4.
Naess, A., 1992, “Prediction of Extremes Related to the Second-Order, Sum-Frequency Responses of a TLP,” Proc. 2nd International Offshore Polar Engineering, ISOPE, pp. 436–443.
5.
Winterstein, S. R., Ude, T. C., and Kleiven, G., 1994, “Springing and Slow-Drift Responses: Predicted Extremes and Fatigue vs. Simulation,” Proc., BOSS-94, Vol. 3, pp. 1–15.
6.
Winterstein
,
S. R.
,
1988
, “
Nonlinear Vibration Models for Extremes and Fatigue
,”
J. Eng. Mech., ASCE
,
114
, No.
10
, pp.
1772
1790
.
7.
Crandall, S. H., and Mark, W. D., 1963, Random Vibration in Mechanical Systems, Academic Press, New York, NY.
8.
Ude, T. C., Kumar, S., and Winterstein, S. R., 1996, “TFPOP 2.1: Stochastic Response Analysis of Floating Structures under Wind, Current, and Second-Order Wave Loads,” Technical Report RMS-18, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
9.
Winterstein
,
S. R.
,
Jha
,
A. K.
, and
Kumar
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Reliability of Floating Structures: Extreme Response and Load Factor Design
,”
J. Water, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, ASCE
,
125
, No. 4.
10.
Jha, A. K., De Jong, P. R., and Winterstein, S. R., 1997, “Motions of a Spar Buoy in Random Seas: Comparing Predictions and Model Test Results,” Proc., BOSS-97, Vol. 2, pp. 333–347.
11.
Manuel, L., and Winterstein, S. R., 1998, “Estimation of Air Gap Statistics for Floating Structures: Release of TFPOP Version 2.2—A Computer Program for Performing Stochastic Response Analysis of Floating Structures,” Technical Note TN-4, Reliability of Marine Structures Program, Stanford University.
You do not currently have access to this content.