A major design feature of the Mobile Offshore Base (MOB) is its ability to transit anywhere in the world in the required time frame. This means that the Single Base Units (SBU’s) of the MOB must be able to transit in severe environmental conditions. In these extreme sea conditions, a primary cause for concern is the large accelerations that the vessel motions might experience due to the high static stability of the MOB at Transit Draft. Furthermore, since the vessel has minimum freeboard in this condition, it is exposed to green water over the pontoon tops. The submergence of the pontoon deck causes a considerable loss in the vessel’s restoring moment. These concerns have warranted a study by the Office of Naval Research into the Transit Draft Dynamics of the MOB. A part of the research in progress involves the development of a nonlinear system modeling and optimization tool utilizing Reverse MI/SO (Multiple-Input/Single Output) techniques. Reverse MI/SO is based on the statistical signal processing of the recorded time histories of the excitation and response of the nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom system. This method of analysis is functional and reliable in identifying an ideal representation of the linear and nonlinear terms of the system under consideration. Reverse MI/SO is a frequency domain analysis technique that also provides coherence functions for each of the terms in the model enabling an evaluation of the correctness of the proposed integro-diffrential equation of motion representing the system. In this paper we analyze the large amplitude heave and pitch motion of the MOB. It is a well-known fact in linear ship motions theory that for a symmetric ship with zero forward speed the cross-coupling added mass and damping coefficients are zero [1]. However, for large amplitude (nonlinear) motions of the MOB, we find these linear coefficients to be non-zero.

1.
Timman
,
R.
, and
Newman
,
J.N.
,
1962
, “
The Coupled Damping Coefficents of a Symmetric Ship
,”
SNAME Journal of Ship Research
,
5
(
4
),
1
9
.
2.
Falzarano, J.M., Uppu, K., Rodrigues, W.E. and Vassilev, R.H., 1999, “MOB SBU Transit Draft Dynamics and Stability Analytic Study,” Third International Workshop on Very Large Floating Structures (VLFS ’99), Honolulu, Sept, 1999, edited by R. Ertekin and J. Kim.
3.
Falzarano, J.M., Rodrigues, W.E., Vassilev, R.H., Das, S. and Cheng, J., 2000, “MOB Transit Draft Dynamics and Stability,” OMAE 2000 Conference, New Orleans, Feb 14–17.
4.
Falzarano, J.M., Cheng, J, Das, S., Rodrigues, W.E. and Vassilev, R.H., 2000, “MOB Transit Draft Transient Dynamics and Stability,” Proceedings of the Tenth (2000) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Seattle, May 28–June 2.
5.
Rodrigues, W. and Falzarano, J., 2001, “Transit Draft Heave Motion Analysis of The Mobile Offshore Base (MOB) Using Reverse MI/SO Techniques,” Proceedings of the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Stavanger, Norway, June.
6.
Palo, P.A., Bendat, J.S. and Coppolino, R.N., 1998, “Identification of Low-Order Equations of Motion for Nonlinear Stability Studies,” Stochastically Excited Nonlinear Ocean Structures, Shlesinger, M.F. and Swean, T. (ed.), Singapore: World Scientific.
7.
Bendat
,
J.S.
,
Coppolino
,
R.N.
, and
Palo
,
P.A.
,
1995
, “
Identification of Physical Parameters with Memory in Non-linear Systems
,”
Int. J. Nonlinear Mech.
,
30
,
841
860
.
8.
Dillingham, J.T., and Falzarano, J.M., 1986, “A Numerical Method for Simulating Three-dimensional Sloshing,” Proceedings of the Eleventh Ship Technology Research Symposium (STAR), Portland, SNAME.
9.
Palo
,
P.A.
,
Bendat
,
J.S.
, and
Coppolino
,
R.N.
,
1992
, “
New Nonlinear System Identification Techniques for Nonlinear Diffrential Equations of Motion
,”
Probab. Eng. Mech.
,
7
(
1
),
43
43
.
10.
Narayanan, S., Yim, S.C.S., and Palo, P.A., 1998, “Nonlinear System Identification of a Moored Structural System,” International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Montreal, May 1998.
11.
Bendat, J.S., 1998, Nonlinear Systems Techniques and Applications, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
12.
Rodrigues, W.E., 2000, “Transit Draft Roll Motion Stability Analysis of the Mobile Offshore Base using reverse MI/SO techniques,” M.S. Thesis, Univ. of New Orleans.
13.
Chakrabarti, S.K., 1990, Hydrodynamics of Offshore Structure, Southampton, WIT Press.
14.
Cummins, W.E., 1962, “Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions,” David Taylor Model Basin, Seaworthiness and Fluid Dynamics Division Report 1661, Washington.
15.
Newman, J.N., 1977, Marine Hydrodynamics, Cambridge, MIT Press.
16.
Kriebel, D., and Wallendorf, L., 1999, “Physical Model Tests on a Generic MOB Module,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Very Large Floating Structures (VLFS ’99), Honolulu, Sept. 22–24, 1999, edited by R. Ertekin and J. Kim.
17.
WAMIT, 2002, User’s Manual, www.wamit.com.
18.
Das, S., and Falzarano, J., 2001, “Transit Draft Roll Motion Stability Analysis Of The Mobile Offshore Base (MOB) Using Time Varying Coefficients,” Proceedings of the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Stavanger, Norway, June.
19.
Abkowitz, M.A, 1969, Stability and Motion Control of Ocean Vehicles, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
20.
Bendat, J.S. and A.G. Piersol, 1993, Engineering Applications of Correlation & Spectral Analysis, (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley-Interscience.
21.
Bendat, J.S. and A.G. Piersol, 1986, Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley-Interscience.
22.
Falzarano, J.M., 1990, “Predicting Complicated Dynamics Leading to Vessel Capsizing,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.
You do not currently have access to this content.