Abstract

Many offshore jackets have no braces between the top of jacket and the bottom of topsides deck. This can be either due to the installation requirement and/or an effort to reduce wave loads. This kind of jacket bay is a portal frame. For the design of portal frame columns, the current offshore standards point to the unbraced frame alignment chart solution from onshore standards such as the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). In this paper, we will show that the AISC alignment chart unbraced frame K-factor solution is conservative for offshore applications, and perhaps too conservative. This is because the traditional alignment chart assumes that the entire structure is a moment frame. In offshore applications, the unbraced frame is almost always combined with braced frames from above and/or below. In this paper, we will derive a K-factor solution that is suitable for a braced/unbraced frame combination. This solution is validated with structural buckling finite element method (FEM) analyses of typical offshore frames. Design implications from using the traditional alignment chart versus current new K-factor solution are also discussed.

References

1.
API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD
,
2014
, “Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design,” 22nd ed.
2.
AISC 335-89
,
1989
, “
Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, Allowable Stress Design and Plastic Design
.”
3.
ISO 19902
,
2007
, “Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries—Fixed Steel Offshore Structures,” 1st ed.
4.
API Recommended Practice 2A-LRFD
,
2019
, “Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Load and Resistance Factors Design,” 2nd ed.
5.
AISC 360-16
,
2016
, “
Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
.”
6.
Ziemian
,
R. D.
, ed.,
2010
,
Guide to Stability Design for Metal Structures
, 6th ed.,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
.
7.
ASCE
,
1997
,
Effective Length and Notional Load Approaches for Assessing Frame Stability: Implications for American Steel Design
,
Task Committee on Effective Length, American Society of Civil Engineers
,
New York
.
8.
Kavanagh
,
T. C.
,
1962
, “
Effective Length of Framed Columns
,”
Trans. ASCE
,
127
(
2
), pp.
81
101
.
9.
Chen
,
W. F.
, and
Lui
,
E. M.
,
1987
,
Structural Stability, Theory and Implementation
,
Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
,
New York
.
10.
Galambos
,
T. V.
, and
Surovek
,
A. E.
,
2008
,
Structural Stability of Steel: Concepts and Applications for Structural Engineers
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
.
11.
ABAQUS/CAE
,
2018
, “
Dassault Systems Simulia Corp.
You do not currently have access to this content.