Abstract

Fatigue limit state design check for offshore wind turbines is based on SN curves and the Palmgren–Miner rule approach and focuses normally on stationary processes for which startup and/or shutdown operations induced transient load processes are normally not accounted for. However, large databases of real-time measurements show that the shutdown and startup operations may appear in any operational conditions and the frequency of such operations could be considerable. Although design standards require fatigue design checks for the transient load processes induced by startup and shutdown operations, relevant publications addressing this issue are very limited in particular for floating wind turbines. This paper focuses on analyzing the importance of startup and shutdown induced transient load processes on fatigue damage in the tower of two MW-level horizontal axis semi-submersible wind turbines. The analysis is carried on by comparing short-term fatigue damage in several environmental conditions with and without the startup and shutdown induced transient load processes. It is found that, in many environmental conditions, startup and/or shutdown operations may make an increase in short-term fatigue damage by 10% to 100%, while in some situations, the fatigue damage may be increased by up to 200%. The importance of the transient load processes on long-term fatigue damage is related to the occurrence frequency of startup and shutdown events. Publicly available data indicate that the average time between two consecutive shutdown events might be less than 39 h. However, more data and analysis are needed regarding these issues.

References

References
1.
Moan
,
T.
,
Gao
,
Z.
,
Bachynski
,
E.
, and
Nejad
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Recent Advances in Integrated Response Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines in a Reliability Perspective
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
142
(
5
), p.
052002
.10.1115/1.4046196
2.
Butterfield
,
S.
,
Musial
,
W.
,
Jonkman
,
J.
, and
Sclavounos
,
P.
,
2007
, “
Engineering Challenges for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Technical Report NREL/CP-500-38776
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
3.
Lotsberg
,
I.
,
2016
,
Fatigue Design of Marine Structures
,
Cambridge University Press
,
UK
.
4.
IEC
,
2005
,
Wind Turbines—Part 1: Design Requirements
,
IEC-61400-1, International Electrotechnical Commission
.
5.
IEC
,
2009
,
Wind Turbines: Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines
,
IEC-61400-3, International Electrotechnical Commission
.
6.
DNV
,
2013
,
Offshore Standard—Design of Floating Wind Turbine Structures
,
DNV-OS-J103, Det Norske Veritas
.
7.
ABS
,
2013
,
Guide for Building and Classing Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Installations
,
American Bureau of Shipping
.
8.
ClassNK
,
2012
,
Guidelines for Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Structures
,
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai
.
9.
DNV
,
2010
,
Recommended Practice—Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures
,
DNV-RP-C203, Det Norske Veritas
.
10.
Kvittem
,
M. I.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Time Domain Analysis Procedures for Fatigue Assessment of a Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
40
, pp.
38
59
. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.10.009
11.
DNVGL
,
2012
,
Certification of Offshore Wind Turbines Guideline—Edition 2012
,
Det Norske Veritas
.
12.
Peters
,
V. A.
,
Ogilvie
,
A. B.
, and
Bond
,
C. R.
,
2012
,
Continuous Reliability Enhancement for Wind (CREW) Database > Wind Plant Reliability Benchmark
,
SAND2012-7328, Sandia National Laboratories
,
CA
.
13.
Hines
,
V. A.
,
Ogilvie
,
A. B.
, and
Bond
,
C. R.
,
2013
,
Continuous Reliability Enhancement for Wind (CREW) Database > Wind Plant Reliability Benchmark
,
Sandia National Laboratories
,
CA
.
14.
Jonkman
,
J.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
,
Musial
,
W.
, and
Scott
,
G.
,
2009
,
Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development
,
NREL/TP-500-38060, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
15.
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2010
,
Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3
,
NREL/TP-500-47535, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
16.
Luan
,
C.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Design and Analysis of a Braceless Steel 5-mw Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine
,”
35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Busan, South Korea
,
June 19–24
,
OMAE2016-54848
.
17.
Robertson
,
A.
,
Jonkman
,
J.
,
Masciola
,
M.
,
Song
,
H.
,
Goupee
,
A.
,
Coulling
,
A.
, and
Luan
,
C.
,
2012
,
Definition of the Semisubmersible Floating System for Phase II of OC4
,
Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continuation (OC4) for IEA Task 30
,
Golden, CO
.
18.
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
,
1990
,
Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures
,
Cambridge University Press
,
UK
.
19.
Li
,
L.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Joint Distribution of Environmental Condition at Five European Offshore Sites for Design of Combined Wind and Wave Energy Devices
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
137
(
3
), p.
031901
. 10.1115/1.4029842
20.
Ormberg
,
H.
,
Passano
,
E.
, and
Luxcey
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Global Analysis of a Floating Wind Turbine Using an Aero-Hydro-Elastic Model. Part 1: Code Development and Case Study
,”
30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
OMAE2011-50114
.
21.
Ormberg
,
H.
, and
Bachynski
,
E. E.
,
2012
, “
Global Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines: Code Development, Model Sensitivity and Benchmark Study
,”
22nd International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Rhodes, Greece
,
June 17–22
, vol.
1
, pp.
366
373
.
22.
Luxcey
,
N.
,
Ormberg
,
H.
, and
Passano
,
E.
,
2011
, “
Global Analysis of a Floating Wind Turbine Using an Aero-Hydro-Elastic Numerical Model. Part 2: Benchmark Study
,”
30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering
,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
OMAE2011-50088
.
23.
Moriarty
,
P. J.
, and
Hansen
,
A. C.
,
2005
, “
AeroDyn theory manual
,”
Technical Report, NREL/TP-500-36881
.
24.
Nejad
,
A. R.
,
Bachynski
,
E. E.
,
Kvittem
,
M. I.
,
Luan
,
C.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Stochastic Dynamic Load Effect and Fatigue Damage Analysis of Drivetrains in Land-Based and TLP, Spar and Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbines
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
42
, pp.
137
153
. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.03.006
25.
Moan
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Recent Development of Analysis and Design of Offshore Wind Turbines for Deep Water
,”
Renewable Energies Offshore—1st International Conference on Renewable Energies Offshore
,
Lisbon, Portugal
,
Nov. 24–26
.
26.
Bachynski
,
E. E.
,
Etemaddar
,
M.
,
Kvittem
,
M. I.
,
Luan
,
C.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines During Pitch Actuator Fault, Grid Loss, and Shutdown
,”
Energy Proc.
,
35
, pp.
210
222
. 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.174
27.
Bachynski
,
E. E.
,
2014
, “
Design and Dynamic Analysis of Tension Leg Platform Wind Turbines
,”
Ph.D thesis
,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
,
Trondheim, Norway
.
28.
MARINTEK
,
2011
,
SIMO User’s Manual
,
Sintef Ocean
,
Trondheim, Norway
.
29.
MARINTEK
,
2013
,
RIFLEX User’s Manual
,
Sintef Ocean
,
Trondheim, Norway
.
30.
Jonkman
,
B. J.
,
2009
,
TurbSim User’s Guide: Version 1.50
,
NREL/TP-500-46198, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
31.
Luan
,
C.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Development and Verification of a Time-Domain Approach for Determining Forces and Moments in Structural Components of Floaters With an Application to Floating Wind Turbines
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
51
, pp.
87
109
. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.10.002
32.
DNV
,
2010b
,
Recommended Practice—Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads
,
DNV-RP-C205, Det Norske Veritas
.
33.
Brodtkorb
,
P. A.
,
Johannesson
,
P.
,
Lindgren
,
G.
,
Rychlik
,
I.
,
Rydén
,
J.
, and
,
E.
,
2000
, “
WAFO—a Matlab Toolbox for Analysis of Random Waves and Loads
,”
Proceedings of the 10th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Seattle
,
May 27–June 2
, vol.
3
, pp.
343
350
.
34.
Jiang
,
Z.
,
Moan
,
T.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Karimirad
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Effect of Shut-Down Procedures on the Dynamic Responses of a Spar-Type Floating Wind Turbine
,”
32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Nantes, France
,
June 9–14
,
OMAE2013-10214
.
You do not currently have access to this content.