Accurate prediction of the burst pressure is indispensible for the engineering design and integrity assessment of the oil and gas pipelines. A plenty of analytical and empirical equations have been proposed to predict the burst pressures of the pipelines; however, it is difficult to accurately predict the burst pressures and evaluate the accuracy of these equations. In this paper, a failure window method was presented to predict the burst pressure of the pipes. First, the security of the steel pipelines under the internal pressure can be assessed. And then the accuracy of the previous analytical and empirical equations can also be generally evaluated. Finally, the effect of the wall thinning of the pipes on the failure window was systemically investigated. The results indicate that it is extremely formidable to establish an equation to predict the burst pressure with a high accuracy and a broad application, while it is feasible to create a failure window to determine the range of the dangerous internal pressure. Calculations reveal that some predictions of the burst pressure equations like Faupel, Soderberg, Maximum stress, and Nadai (1) are overestimated to some extent; some like ASME, maximum shear stress, Turner, Klever and Zhu–Leis and Baily–Nadai (2) basically reliable; the rest like API and Nadai (3) slightly conservative. With the wall thinning of the steel pipelines, the failure window is gradually lowered and narrowed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2017
Research-Article
The Failure Window Method and Its Application in Pipeline Burst
Zhanfeng Chen,
Zhanfeng Chen
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Hao Ye,
Hao Ye
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Sunting Yan,
Sunting Yan
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiaoli Shen,
Xiaoli Shen
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Zhijiang Jin
Zhijiang Jin
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: jzj@zju.edu.cn
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: jzj@zju.edu.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Zhanfeng Chen
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Hao Ye
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Sunting Yan
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Xiaoli Shen
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
Zhijiang Jin
Institute of Process Equipment,
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: jzj@zju.edu.cn
College of Energy Engineering,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: jzj@zju.edu.cn
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 15, 2016; final manuscript received June 5, 2017; published online August 2, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Hardayal S. Mehta.
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Oct 2017, 139(5): 051702 (7 pages)
Published Online: August 2, 2017
Article history
Received:
November 15, 2016
Revised:
June 5, 2017
Citation
Chen, Z., Ye, H., Yan, S., Shen, X., and Jin, Z. (August 2, 2017). "The Failure Window Method and Its Application in Pipeline Burst." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. October 2017; 139(5): 051702. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037045
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
The Behavior of Elbow Elements at Pure Bending Applications Compared to Beam and Shell Element Models
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February 2025)
Related Articles
Modeling Pop Action Pressure Relief Valve as a Bistable Element
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2015)
Determination of Limit Load Solution for the Remaining Load-Carrying Capacity of Corroded Pipelines
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2016)
Performance-Based Reliability of ASME Piping Design Equations
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2017)
Influence of Internal Corrosive Defect on the Burn-Through of In-Service Welding on Pipelines
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Siphon Seals and Water Legs
Hydraulics, Pipe Flow, Industrial HVAC & Utility Systems: Mister Mech Mentor, Vol. 1
Dynamic Behavior of Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE GIRTH WELDS USING GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)