A new anidolic parametric trough solar collector (PmTC) having 8.12 m net width aperture has been recently proposed for a commercial evacuated receiver tube with an absorber diameter of 70 mm. Since the collector was designed ignoring transmission, absorption, and reflection optical losses, calculations of the optical efficiency and the incidence angle modifier (IAM) by means of Monte Carlo spectral raytracing simulations using real slope errors distributions and taking into account Fresnel reflection losses were done. Comparison with an Eurotrough parabolic trough collector (PTC) shows an optical penalization of 5.1% due to the reflectivity and additional soiling of the secondary mirror, to an increase in the end losses and to the Fresnel reflection losses. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) system advisor model (SAM) was used to perform annual simulations of two commercial 50 MWe oil power plants without thermal energy storage located in Seville. A PTC solar field consisting of 90 loops, each one having four Eurotrough solar collector assemblies (SCA) with 150 m length was first modeled resulting in a gross production of 386 kWh/(m2 yr). A PmTC solar field with the same module length and similar SCA net aperture area was also simulated. A final configuration of 94 loops and four SCAs with 100 m length per loop yields a gross production of 379 kWh/(m2 yr) showing no improvement compared to the reference PTC plant. The present study allows to advance in the understanding of the potential of the anidolic optic to produce optical geometries able to effectively improve the PTC technology in the short-term projecting results at a commercial plant level.

References

1.
CSP World Map
,
2016
, “
Concentrating Solar Power Plant
,” SACM, La Rinconada, Seville, Spain, accessed Nov. 25, 2016, http://cspworld.org/cspworldmap
2.
International Energy Agency
,
2014
, “
Solar Thermal Electricity
,” Technology Roadmap, OECD/IEA, Paris, accessed June 2, 2017, https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/technologyroadmapsolarthermalelectricity_2014edition.pdf
3.
Estela
,
2012
, “
Solar Thermal Electricity—Strategic Research Agenda 2020–2025
,” Solar Industry Reports, European Solar Thermal Electricity Association, Brussels, Belgium, accessed June 2, 2017, http://www.estelasolar.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2012-ESTELA-Strategic-Reseach-Agenda-2020-2025_Summary.pdf
4.
Nunez-Bootello
,
J. P.
,
Price
,
H.
,
Silva
,
M.
, and
Doblaré
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Optical Analysis of a Two Stage XX SMS Concentrator for Parametric Trough Primary and Flat Absorber With Application in DSG Solar Thermal Plants
,”
ASME Sol. Energy Eng.
,
138
(
2
), p. 021002.
5.
Fernández-García
,
A.
,
Zarza
,
E.
,
Valenzuela
,
L.
, and
Pérez
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Parabolic-Trough Solar Collectors and Their Applications
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
14
(
7
), pp.
1695
1721
.
6.
Lüpfert
,
E.
,
Geyer
,
M.
,
Schiel
,
W.
,
Esteban
,
A.
,
Osuna
,
R.
,
Zarza
,
E.
, and
Nava
,
P.
,
2001
, “
Eurotrough Design Issues and Prototype Testing at PSA
,”
Solar Forum 2001 Solar Energy: The Power to Choose
, Washington, DC, Apr. 21–25, pp. 389–394.
7.
Janottea
,
N.
,
Feckler
,
G.
,
Kötter
,
J.
,
Decker
,
S.
,
Herrmann
,
U.
,
Schmitz
,
M.
, and
Lüpfert
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Dynamic Performance Evaluation of the HelioTrough Collector Demonstration Loop—Towards a New Benchmark in Parabolic Trough Qualification
,”
Energy Procedia
,
49
, pp.
109
117
.
8.
Riffelmanna
,
K.
,
Richert
,
T.
,
Nava
,
P.
, and
Schweitzer
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Ultimate Trough®—A Significant Step Towards Cost-Competitive CSP
,”
Energy Procedia
,
49
, pp.
1831
1839
.
9.
Marcotte
,
P.
, and
Manning
,
K.
,
2013
, “
Development of an Advanced Large-Aperture Parabolic Trough Collector
,”
Energy Procedia
,
49
, pp.
145
154
.
10.
Nunez-Bootello
,
J. P.
,
Price
,
H.
,
Silva
,
M.
, and
Doblaré
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Optical Analysis of a Two Stage XX Concentrator for Parametric Trough Primary and Tubular Absorber With Application in STE Trough Solar Plants
,”
ASME Sol. Energy Eng.
,
138
(
4
), p. 041002.
11.
Nunez-Bootello
,
J. P.
,
Mier-Torrecilla
,
M.
,
Silva
,
M.
, and
Doblaré
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Aerodynamics of New Solar Parametric Troughs: Two Dimensional and Three Dimensional Single Module Numerical Analysis
,”
Sol. Energy
,
135
, pp.
742
749
.
12.
Cannavaro
,
D.
,
Chaves
,
J.
, and
Collares
,
M.
,
2013
, “
New Second-Stage Concentrators (XX SMS) for Parabolic Primaries; Comparison With Conventional Parabolic Trough Concentrators
,”
Sol. Energy
,
92
, pp.
98
105
.
13.
Neumann
,
A.
,
Witzke
,
A.
,
Jones
,
S. A.
, and
Schmitt
,
G.
,
2002
, “
Representative Terrestrial Solar Brightness Profiles
,”
ASME
Paper No. SED2002-1069.
14.
NREL
,
2016
, “
Solar Advisor Model
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, accessed Nov. 25, 2016, https://sam.nrel.gov/
15.
Wagner
,
M. J.
, and
Gilman
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Technical Manual for the SAM Physical Trough Model
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, Report No.
NREL/TP-5500-51825
.
16.
Armenta-Deu
,
C.
,
1991
, “
A Correlation Model to Compute the Incidence Angle Modifier and to Estimate Its Effect on Collectible Solar Radiation
,”
Renewable Energy
,
1
(
5
), pp.
803
809
.
17.
Pottler
,
K.
,
Lüpfert
,
E.
,
Johnston
,
G. H. G.
, and
Shortis
,
M. R.
,
2005
, “
Photogrammetry: A Powerful Tool for Geometric Analysis of Solar Concentrators and Their Components
,”
ASME Sol. Energy Eng.
,
127
(
1
), pp. 94–101.
18.
San Vicente
,
G.
,
Bayón
,
R.
,
Germán
,
N.
, and
Morales
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Surface Modification of Porous Antireflective Coatings for Solar Glass Covers
,”
Solar Energy
,
85
(
4
), pp.
676
680
.
19.
Burkholder
,
F.
, and
Kutscher
,
C.
,
2009
, “
Heat Loss Testing of Schott's 2008 PTR70 Parabolic Trough Receiver
,” U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, Report No.
NREL/TP-550-45633
.
20.
NREL
,
2016
, “
Concentrating Solar Power Projects
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, accessed Nov. 25, 2016, http://www.nrel.gov
You do not currently have access to this content.