Proximity recording introduces some new head/disk interface characteristics as compared to the conventional noncontact recording. The different design philosophy has led to several distinct partial contact tripad air bearing designs, including the shaped rail negative pressure and straight rail positive pressure tripad sliders. The impact of these new characteristics and design differences on the head/disk reliability needs to be thoroughly understood in order to ensure a successful proximity recording. This paper investigates the partial contact air bearing characteristics of three representative tripad slider designs. The contact stiffness is used as a measure of the air bearing compliance. Simulations of the fly height, contact force, altitude sensitivity, substrate waviness induced spacing and contact force modulations, contact take-off, track seeking and crash stop dynamics are performed for the three tripad slider designs. The results demonstrate that the negative pressure tripad sliders can be designed such that they can achieve both flat fly height and contact force profiles and, fast take-off, while still maintaining a small contact stiffness. However, the air bearing compliance and waviness following performance have to be compromised for the correct partial contact air bearing pitch stiffness.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Air bearings, Pressure, Stiffness, Design, Disks, Rails, Dynamics (Mechanics), Reliability, Simulation
1.
Fukui
S.
, and
Kaneko
R.
,
1988
, “
Analysis of Ultra-Thin Gas Film Lubrication Based on Linearized Boltzmann Equation: First Report-Derivation of a Generalized Lubrication Equation Including Thermal Creep Flow
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
110
, pp.
335
–
341
.
2.
Greenwood, J. A., and Williamson, J. B. P., 1966, “Contact of Nominally Flat Surface,” Proceedings Royal Society (London), Series A295, pp. 300–319.
3.
Hsia, Y-T., and Donovan, M. J., 1996, “The Design and Tribology of Tripad Sliders for Pseudo-Contact Recording in Magnetic Hard Disk Drives,” ASME Trib-Vol. 6, pp. 17–23.
4.
Hu, Y., 1996, “Head-Disk-Suspension Dynamics,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley.
5.
Hu
Y.
, and
Bogy
D. B.
,
1996
, “
Dynamic Stability and Spacing Modulation of Sub-25nm Fly Height Sliders
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
119
, Oct., p.
646
646
.
6.
Hu, Y., and Bogy, D. B., 1998, “Solution of the Rarefied Gas Lubrication Equation Using an Additive Correction Based Multigrid Control Volume Method,” ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY, published in this issue pp. 280–288.
7.
Machcha, A. R., McMillan, T. C., and Talke, F. E., 1996, “Tribology of Tri-Pad Sliders,” STLE Paper No. 96-TC-5C-2.
8.
Talke, F. E., 1996, “A Review of the Head/Medium Interface at Very Close Spacing,” ASME Trib-Vol. 6, pp. 1–9.
9.
Voights
R.
, and
Doan
T.
,
1996
, “
How Disk Topography Can Affect Proximity Recording
,”
Data Storage
, Vol.
3
, No.
8
, pp.
59
–
62
.
10.
Wahl, M. H., Kwon, H., and Talke, F. E., 1996, “Simulation of Asperity Contacts at the Head/Disk Interface of Tri-Pad Sliders During Steady-State Flying,” STLE Paper No. 96-TC-5C-1.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.