A model for deep-groove and angular-contact ball bearings was developed to investigate the influence of a flexible cage on bearing dynamics. The cage model introduces flexibility by representing the cage as an ensemble of discrete elements that allow deformation of the fibers connecting the elements. A finite element model of the cage was developed to establish the relationships between the nominal cage properties and those used in the flexible discrete element model. In this investigation, the raceways and balls have six degrees of freedom. The discrete elements comprising the cage each have three degrees of freedom in a cage reference frame. The cage reference frame has five degrees of freedom, enabling three-dimensional motion of the cage ensemble. Newton’s laws are used to determine the accelerations of the bearing components, and a fourth-order Runge–Kutta algorithm with constant step size is used to integrate their equations of motion. Comparing results from the dynamic bearing model with flexible and rigid cages reveals the effects of cage flexibility on bearing performance. The cage experiences nearly the same motion and angular velocity in the loading conditions investigated regardless of the cage type. However, a significant reduction in ball-cage pocket forces occurs as a result of modeling the cage as a flexible body. Inclusion of cage flexibility in the model also reduces the time required for the bearing to reach steady-state operation.

2.
Walters
,
C. T.
, 1971, “
The Dynamics of Ball Bearings
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
93
(
2
), pp.
1
10
.
3.
Rumbarger
,
J. H.
, 1973, “
Gas Turbine Engine Mainshaft Roller Bearing—System Analysis
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
95
, pp.
401
416
.
4.
Gupta
,
P. K.
, 1984,
Advanced Dynamics of Rolling Elements
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
5.
Boesiger
,
E. A.
,
Donley
,
A. D.
, and
Loewenthal
,
S.
, 1992, “
An Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Ball Bearing Retainer Instabilities
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
114
(
3
), pp.
530
539
.
6.
Pederson
,
B. M.
,
Sadeghi
,
F.
, and
Wassgren
,
C.
, 2006, “
The Effects of Cage Flexibility on Ball-to-Cage Pocket Contact Forces and Cage Instability in Deep Groove Ball Bearings
,”
SAE Transmission and Driveline Symposium
, Paper No. 2006-01-0358, pp.
43
54
.
7.
Saheta
,
V.
, 2001, “
Dynamics of Rolling Element Bearings Using Discrete Element Method
,” MS thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
8.
Kragelskii
,
I. V.
, 1965,
Friction and Wear
,
Butterworths
,
London
.
9.
Raje
,
N.
,
Sadeghi
,
F.
,
Rateick
,
R. G.
, and
Hoeprich
,
M. R.
, 2007, “
Evaluation of Stresses Around Inclusions in Hertzian Contacts Using the Discrete Element Method
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
129
, pp.
283
291
.
10.
Hibbeler
,
R. C.
, 2004,
Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
, Chap. 21, pp.
574
577
.
11.
Rao
,
S. S.
, 2003,
Mechanical Vibrations
,
Pearson Prentice Hall
.
12.
Frankovich
,
D.
, 2002, “
The Basics of Vibration Isolation Using Elastomeric Materials
,” E-A-R Specialty Composites Website, http://www.earsc.com/pdfs/engineering/BasicsofVibrationIsolation.pdfhttp://www.earsc.com/pdfs/engineering/BasicsofVibrationIsolation.pdf
13.
Kingsbury
,
E.
, and
Walker
,
R.
, 1994, “
Motions of an Unstable Retainer in an Instrument Ball Bearing
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
116
, pp.
202
208
.
14.
Kannel
,
J. W.
, and
Bupara
,
S. S.
, 1978, “
A Simplified Model of Cage Motion in Angular Contact Ball Bearings Operating in the EHD Lubrication Regime
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
100
, pp.
395
403
.
You do not currently have access to this content.