Aerodynamic measurements were acquired on a modern single-stage, transonic, high-pressure turbine with the adjacent low-pressure turbine vane row (a typical civilian one and one-half stage turbine rig) to observe the effects of low-pressure turbine vane clocking on overall turbine performance. The turbine rig (loosely referred to in this paper as the stage) was operated at design corrected conditions using the Ohio State University Gas Turbine Laboratory Turbine Test Facility. The research program utilized uncooled hardware in which all three airfoils were heavily instrumented at multiple spans to develop a full clocking dataset. The low-pressure turbine vane row (LPTV) was clocked relative to the high-pressure turbine vane row (HPTV). Various methods were used to evaluate the influence of clocking on the aeroperformance (efficiency) and the aerodynamics (pressure loading) of the LPTV, including time-resolved and time-averaged measurements. A change in overall efficiency of approximately 2–3% due to clocking effects is demonstrated and could be observed using a variety of independent methods. Maximum efficiency is obtained when the time-average surface pressures are highest on the LPTV and the time-resolved surface pressure (both in the time domain and frequency domain) show the least amount of variation. The overall effect is obtained by integrating over the entire airfoil, as the three-dimensional (3D) effects on the LPTV surface are significant. This experimental data set validates several computational research efforts that suggested wake migration is the primary reason for the perceived effectiveness of vane clocking. The suggestion that wake migration is the dominate mechanism in generating the clocking effect is also consistent with anecdotal evidence that fully cooled engine rigs do not see a great deal of clocking effect. This is consistent since the additional disturbances induced by the cooling flows and∕or the combustor make it extremely difficult to find an alignment for the LPTV given the strong 3D nature of modern high-pressure turbine flows.

1.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
658
.
2.
Huber
,
F. W.
,
Johnson
,
P. D.
,
Sharma
,
O. P.
,
Staubach
,
J. B.
, and
Gaddis
,
S. W.
, 1994, “
Performance Improvement Through Indexing of Turbine Airfoils: Part 1—Experimental Investigation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, pp.
630
635
.
3.
Jouini
,
D. B.M.
,
Little
,
D.
,
Dunn
,
B. E. M.
,
Haldeman
,
C.
, and
Johnson
,
P. D.
, 2003, “
Experimental Investigation of the Aerodynamic Effects of Clocking Vanes and Blade Rows in a 1∕3 Scale Model Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38872.
4.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Seymour
,
P. J.
,
Woodward
,
S. H.
,
George
,
W. K.
, and
Chupp
,
R. E.
, 1989, “
Phase Resolved Heat-Flux Measurements on a Blade of a Full-Scale Rotating Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
111
, pp.
8
19
.
5.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Krumanaker
,
M.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 2003, “
Influence of Clocking and Vane∕Blade Spacing on the Unsteady Surface Pressure Loading for a Modern Stage and One-Half Transonic Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38724.
6.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, 2003, “
An Experimental Investigation of Clocking Effects on Turbine Aerodynamics Using a Modern 3-D One and One-half Stage High Pressure Turbine for Code Verification and Flow Model Development
,”
Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering
,
Ohio State University
, Columbus, OH, p.
345
.
7.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Barter
,
J. W.
,
Green
,
B. R.
, and
Bergholz
,
R. F.
, 2004, “
Aerodynamic and Heat-Flux Measurements with Predictions on a Modern One and 1∕2 Stage High Pressure Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53478.
8.
Green
,
B. R.
,
Barter
,
J. W.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 2004, “
Time-Averaged and Time-Accurate Aero-Dynamics for the Recessed Tip Cavity of a High-Pressure Turbine Blade and the Outer Stationary Shroud: Comparison of Computational and Experimental Results
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53443.
9.
Tallman
,
J. A.
, 2004, “
CFD Heat-Transfer Predictions for a High-Pressure Turbine Stage
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53654.
10.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 2001, “
Convective Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics in Axial Flow Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
113
, pp.
637
686
.
11.
Huber
,
F. W.
,
Johnson
,
P. D.
,
Sharma
,
O. P.
,
Staubach
,
J. B.
, and
Gaddis
,
S. W.
, 1996, “
Performance Improvement Through Indexing of Turbine Airfoils: Part 2—Numerical Simulation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, pp.
636
642
.
12.
Dorney
,
D. J.
, and
Gundy-Burlet
,
K.
, 1995, “
Hot-Streak Clocking Effects in a 1−1∕2 Stage Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-202.
13.
Dorney
,
D. J.
, and
Sharma
,
O. P.
, 1994, “
A Study of Turbine Performance Increases Through Airfoil Clocking
,” AIAA Paper No. 96-2816.
14.
Eulitz
,
F.
,
Engel
,
K.
, and
Gebing
,
H.
, 1994, “
Numerical Investigation of the Clocking Effects in a Multistage Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-26.
15.
Johnston
,
D. A.
, and
Fleeter
,
S.
, 1999, “
Turbine Blade Unsteady Heat Transfer Change Due To Stator Indexing, International Gas Turbine and Aeroengie Congress and Exhibition in Indianapolis, Indiana
,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-376.
16.
Arnone
,
A.
,
Marconcini
,
M.
,
Pacciani
,
R.
,
Schipani
,
C.
, and
Spano
,
E.
, 2001, “
Numerical Investigation of Airfoil Clocking in a Three-Stage Low Pressure Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0303.
17.
Reinmoller
,
U.
,
Stephan
,
B.
,
Schmidt
,
S.
, and
Niehuis
,
R.
, 2001, “
Clocking Effects in a 1.5 Stage Axial Turbine- Steady and Unsteady Experimental Investigations Supported by Numerical Simulations
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0304.
18.
Clark
,
J. P.
,
Stetson
,
G. M.
,
Magge
,
S. S.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 2000, “
The Effect of Airfoil Scaling on the Predicted Unsteady Pressure Field in a 1+1∕2 Stage Transonic Turbine and Comparison with Experimental Results
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0446.
19.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Moller
,
J. C.
, and
Steel
,
R. C.
, 1989, “
Operating Point Verification for a Large Shock Tunnel Test Facility
,” Paper No. WRDC-TR-2027.
20.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 1984, “
Heat-Flux Measurements for the Rotor of a Full-Stage Turbine: Part 1—Time-Averaged Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
108
, pp.
90
97
.
21.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Bennett
,
W. A.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Rao
,
K. V.
, 1992, “
Investigation of Unsteady Flow Through a Transonic Turbine Stage: Data∕Prediction Comparison for Time-Averaged and Phase-Resolved Pressure Data
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
91
99
.
22.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, and
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, 1995, “
Phase-Resolved Surface Pressure and Heat-Transfer Measurements on the Blade of a Two-Stage Turbine.
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X
117
, pp.
653
658
.
23.
Barter
,
J. W.
,
Vitt
,
P. H.
, and
Chen
,
J. P.
2000, “
Interaction Effects in a Turbine Stage
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0376.
24.
Chen
,
J. P.
, and
Barter
,
J. W.
, 1998, “
Comparison of Time-Accurate Calculations for the Unsteady Interaction in a Turbine Stage
,” AIAA 98-3292.
You do not currently have access to this content.