Improving the performance and durability of gas turbine aircraft engines depends highly on achieving a better understanding of the flow interactions between the combustor and turbine sections. The flow exiting the combustor is very complex and it is characterized primarily by elevated turbulence and large variations in temperature and pressure. The heat transfer and aerodynamic losses that occur in the turbine passages are driven primarily by these spatial variations. To better understand these effects, the goal of this work is to benchmark an adjustable turbine inlet profile generator for the Turbine Research Facility (TRF) at the Air Force Research Laboratory. The research objective was to experimentally evaluate the performance of the nonreacting simulator that was designed to provide representative combustor exit profiles to the inlet of the TRF turbine test section. This paper discusses the verification testing that was completed to benchmark the performance of the generator. Results are presented in the form of temperature and pressure profiles as well as turbulence intensity and length scale. This study shows how a single combustor geometry can produce significantly different flow and thermal field conditions entering the turbine. Engine designers should place emphasis on obtaining accurate knowledge of the flow distribution within the combustion chamber. Turbine inlet conditions with significantly different profile shapes can result in altered flow physics that can change local aerodynamics and heat transfer.

1.
Barringer
,
M.
,
Thole
,
K.
, and
Polanka
,
M.
, 2004, “
Developing a Combustor Simulator for Investigating High Pressure Turbine Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004–53613.
2.
Barringer
,
M.
,
Thole
,
K.
, and
Polanka
,
M.
, 2006, “
Effects of Combustor Exit Profiles on High Pressure Turbine Vane Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006–90277.
3.
Holdeman
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Mixing of Multiple Jets with a Confined Subsonic Crossflow
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
0360-1285,
19
, pp.
31
70
.
4.
Ames
,
F. E.
, and
Moffat
,
R. J.
, 1990, “
Effects of Simulated Combustor Turbulence on Boundary Layer Heat Transfer
,”
Heat Transfer in Turbulent Flow 1990: Proceedings AIAA/ASME Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference
,
Seattle, WA
, June 18–20.
5.
Barringer
,
M.
,
Richard
,
O.
,
Stitzel
,
S.
,
Walter
,
J.
, and
Thole
,
K.
, 2002, “
Flow Field Simulations of a Gas Turbine Combustor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
508
516
.
6.
Stitzel
,
S.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
, 2004, “
Flow Field Computations of Combustor-Turbine Interactions Relevant to a Gas Turbine Engine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
, pp.
122
129
.
7.
Cameron
,
C.
,
Brouwer
,
J.
,
Wood
,
C.
, and
Samuelsen
,
G.
, 1989, “
A Detailed Characterization of the Velocity and Thermal Fields in a Model Can Combustor With Wall Jet Injection
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
111
, pp.
31
35
.
8.
Bicen
,
A.
,
Tse
,
D.
, and
Whitelaw
,
J.
, 1988, “
Flow and Combustion Characteristics of an Annular Combustor
,”
Combust. Flame
0010-2180,
72
, pp.
175
192
.
9.
Schwab
,
J.
,
Stabe
,
R.
, and
Whitney
,
W.
, 1983, “
Analytical and Experimental Study of Flow Through an Axial Turbine Stage With a Nonuniform Inlet Radial Temperature Profile
,” AIAA Paper No. 83–1175.
10.
Cattafesta
,
L.
, 1988, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Inlet Radial Temperature Profiles on the Aerodynamic Performance of a Transonic Turbine Stage
,” Masters thesis, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.
11.
Chana
,
K.
,
Hurrion
,
J.
, and
Jones
,
T.
, 2003, “
The Design, Development and Testing of a Non-Uniform Inlet Temperature Generator for the QinetiQ Transient Turbine Research Facility
,” ASME Paper No. 2003-GT-38469.
12.
Krishnamoorthy
,
V.
,
Pai
,
B.
, and
Sukhatme
,
S.
, 1988, “
Influence of Upstream Flow Conditions on the Heat Transfer to Nozzle Guide Vanes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
110
, pp.
412
416
.
13.
Van Fossen
,
J.
, and
Bunker
,
R.
, 2002, “
Augmentation of Stagnation Region Heat Transfer Due to Turbulence from an Advanced Dual-Annular Combustor
,” ASME Paper No. GT2002–30184.
14.
Colban
,
W.
,
Thole
,
K.
, and
Zess
,
G.
, 2003, “
Combustor Turbine Interface Studies—Part 1: Endwall Effectiveness Measurements
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
125
, pp.
193
202
.
15.
Hermanson
,
K.
, and
Thole
,
K.
, 2000, “
Effect of Inlet Conditions on Endwall Secondary Flows
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
16
(
2
), pp.
286
296
.
16.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
MacArthur
,
C. D.
, and
Murawski
,
C. G.
, 1992, “
The USAF Advanced Turbine Aerothermal Research Rig (ATARR)
,”
NATO AGARD Propulsion and Energetics Panel Conference Proceedings
527,
Antalya, Turkey
.
17.
Roy
R. K.
,
, 2001,
Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach
,
Wiley
,
New York.
18.
Kunze
,
V.
,
Wolff
,
M.
,
Barringer
,
M.
,
Thole
,
K.
, and
Polanka
,
M.
, 2006, “
Numerical Insight Into Flow and Thermal Patterns Within an Inlet Profile Generator Comparing to Experimental Results
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006–90276.
19.
Goebel
,
S.
,
Abuaf
,
N.
, and
Lee
,
C.
, 1993, “
Measurements of Combustor Velocity and Turbulence Profiles
,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-228.
20.
Kunze
,
V.
,
Wolff
,
M.
,
Barringer
,
M.
,
Thole
,
K.
, and
Polanka
,
M.
, 2005, “
Numerical Modeling of Flow and Thermal Patterns Within a Combustor Simulator
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005–68284.
You do not currently have access to this content.