This paper is the second part of a two part paper that reports on the improvement of efficiency of a one and a half stage high work axial flow turbine. The first part covered the design of the endwall profiling, as well as a comparison with steady probe data; this part covers the analysis of the time-resolved flow physics. The focus is on the time-resolved flow physics that leads to a total-to-total stage efficiency improvement of 1.0%±0.4%. The investigated geometry is a model of a high work (Δh/U2=2.36), axial shroudless HP turbine. The time-resolved measurements have been acquired upstream and downstream of the rotor using a fast response aerodynamic probe (FRAP). This paper contains a detailed analysis of the secondary flow field that is changed between the axisymmetric and the nonaxisymmetric endwall profiling cases. The flowfield at the exit of the first stator is improved considerably due to the nonaxisymmetric endwall profiling and results in reduced secondary flow and a reduction in loss at both hub and tip, as well as a reduced trailing shed vorticity. The rotor has reduced losses and a reduction in secondary flows mainly at the hub. At the rotor exit, the flow field with nonaxisymmetric endwalls is more homogenous due to the reduction in secondary flows in the two rows upstream of the measurement plane. This confirms that nonaxisymmetric endwall profiling is an effective tool for reducing secondary losses in axial turbines. Using a frozen flow assumption, the time-resolved data are used to estimate the axial velocity gradients, which are then used to evaluate the streamwise vorticity and dissipation. The nonaxisymmetric endwall profiling of the first nozzle guide vane show reductions in dissipation and streamwise vorticity due to the reduced trailing shed vorticity. This smaller vorticity explains the reduction in loss at midspan, which is shown in the first part of the two part paper. This leads to the conclusion that nonaxisymmetric endwall profiling also has the potential of reducing trailing shed vorticity.

1.
Dunham
,
J.
, 1970, “
A Review of Cascade Data on Secondary Losses in Turbines
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
12
(
1
), pp.
48
59
.
2.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, 1985, “
Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in Turbine Blade Passages
,”
Trans. ASME: J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
107
(
2
), pp.
248
257
.
3.
Langston
,
L. S.
,
Nice
,
M. L.
, and
Hooper
,
R. M.
, 1977, “
3-Dimensional Flow Within a Turbine Cascade Passage
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
99
(
1
), pp.
21
28
.
4.
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2005, “
Vortex-Wake-Blade Interaction in a Shrouded Axial Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
(
4
), pp.
699
707
.
5.
Sturm
,
W.
,
Scheugenpflug
,
H.
, and
Fottner
,
L.
, 1992, “
Performance Improvements of Compressor Cascades by Controlling the Profile and Sidewall Boundary-Layers
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
(
3
), pp.
477
486
.
6.
Biesinger
,
Th. E.
, 1993, “
Secondary Flow Reduction Techniques in Linear Turbine Cascades
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham, Durham, UK.
7.
Harrison
,
S.
, 1992, “
The Influence of Blade Lean on Turbine Losses
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
(
1
), pp.
184
190
.
8.
Dejc
,
M. E.
, and
Zarjankin
,
A. E.
, 1960, “
Methods of Increasing the Efficiency of Turbine Stages
,”
Teploenergetika (Moscow, Russ. Fed.)
0040-3636,
2
, pp.
18
24
.
9.
Morris
,
A. W. H.
, and
Hoare
,
R. G.
, 1975, “
Secondary Loss Measurements in a Cascade of Turbine Blades With Meridional Wall Profiling
,” ASME Paper No. 75-WA/GT-13.
10.
Atkins
,
M. J.
, 1987, “
Secondary Losses and End-Wall Profiling in a Turbine Cascade
,”
Proceedings of IMechE Turbo Conference
,
C255
(87), pp.
29
42
.
11.
Sauer
,
H.
,
Muller
,
R.
, and
Vogeler
,
K.
, 2001, “
Reduction of Secondary Flow Losses in Turbine Cascades by Leading Edge Modifications at the Endwall
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
(
2
), pp.
207
213
.
12.
Rose
,
M. G.
, 1994, “
Non-Axisymmetric Endwall Profiling in the HP NGVs of an Axial Flow Gas Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-249.
13.
Hartland
,
J. C.
,
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Rose
,
M. G.
, 2000, “
Nonaxisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part II—Experimental Validation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
(
2
), pp.
286
293
.
14.
Ingram
,
G. L.
,
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Brennan
,
G.
, 2002, “
The Effect of End-Wall Profiling on Secondary Flow and Loss Development in a Turbine Cascade
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002–30339.
15.
Brennan
,
G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Fomison
,
N.
, and
Taylor
,
M. D.
, 2001, “
Improving the Efficiency of the Trent 500 HP Turbine Using Non-Axisymetric End Walls: Part I: Turbine Design
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0444.
16.
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Seaman
,
P.
,
Newman
,
D. A.
, and
McManus
,
D.
, 2001, “
Improving the Efficiency of the Trent 500 HP Turbine Using Non–Axisymetric End Walls: Part II: Experimental Validation
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0505.
17.
Duden
,
A.
,
Raab
,
I.
, and
Fottner
,
L.
, 1998, “
Controlling the Secondary Flow in a Turbine Cascade by 3D Airfoil Design and Endwall Contouring
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-072.
18.
Eymann
,
S.
,
Foerster
,
W.
,
Beversdorf
,
M.
,
Reinmoeller
,
U.
,
Niehuis
,
R.
, and
Gier
,
J.
, 2002, “
Improving 3D Flow Characteristics in a Multistage LP Turbine by Means of Endwall Contouring and Airfoil Design Modification: Part I: Design and Experimental Investigation
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002–30352.
19.
Sell
,
M.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2001, “
The 2-Stage Axial Turbine Test Facility LISA
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0492.
20.
Behr
,
T.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2007, “
Unsteady Flow Physics and Performance of a One-and-1/2-Stage Unshrouded High Work Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
129
(
2
), pp.
348
359
.
21.
Kupferschmied
,
P.
,
Kopperl
,
O.
,
Gizzi
,
W. P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 2000, “
Time Resolved Flow Measurements With Fast Aerodynamic Probes in Turbomachinery
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
0957-0233,
11
, pp.
1036
1054
.
22.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2003, “
Unsteady 3-Dimensional Flow Measurement Using a Miniature Virtual 4 Sensor Fast Response Aerodynamic Probe (FRAP)
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003–38128.
23.
Schlichting
,
H.
, 1951,
Grenzschicht-Theorie
,
G. Braun
,
Karlsruhe, Germany
.
24.
Porreca
,
L.
,
Hollenstein
,
M.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2007, “
Turbulence Measurements and Analysis in a Multistage Axial Turbine
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
23
(
1
), pp.
227
234
.
25.
Rose
,
M. G.
, and
Harvey
,
N. W.
, 2000, “
Turbomachinery Wakes: Differential Work and Mixing Losses
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
(
1
), pp.
68
77
.
You do not currently have access to this content.