Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

Abstract

To increase the reliability of turboprop and turboshaft engines in extreme operating conditions, filtering protections such as inlet particle separators (IPSs) can be installed at the intake. The flow inside an IPS is highly 3D and unsteady, with fluctuations especially pronounced when transonic conditions are reached. Locally, shocks can occur, increasing the pressure losses. In this paper, we aim at providing the transonic analysis of an industrial IPS designed for aerodynamic lab testing. As a first step, we define the threshold beyond which sonic conditions are reached in the boundary cross sections of the IPS, in terms of inlet total pressure and Reynolds number, by means of a 1D semi-empirical model. Second, we select a critical configuration, very close to these conditions, and we perform CFD simulations to analyze the locations and evolution of the transonic flow inside the IPS. Different models are presented, i.e., steady and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes, detached eddy simulation, and large eddy simulation, characterized by three levels of resolution (based on the grid size). The results show the evolution of some transonic shocks: the steady-state model is only providing information on averaged quantities, while the time-resolved simulations offer a more precise overview in the time domain (velocity and Mach number fluctuations). The analysis in the frequency domain reveals the frequencies of the transonic fluctuations, which can negatively affect the IPS. Finally, we discuss three alternative designs to effectively improve the operating range and mitigate the risks related to the transonic instabilities, comparing the differences in separation efficiency with respect to the baseline case. The results prove that the optimal design choice is given by the trade-off between operating range, pressure losses, and separation efficiency.

References

1.
Filippone
,
A.
, and
Bojdo
,
N
,
2010
, “
Turboshaft Engine Air Particle Separation
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
46
(
5–6
), pp.
224
245
.
2.
Hamed
,
A.
,
Tabakoff
,
W.
, and
Wenglarz
,
R
,
2006
, “
Erosion and Deposition in Turbomachinery
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
2
), pp.
350
360
.
3.
Barone
,
D.
,
Loth
,
E.
, and
Snyder
,
P.
,
2015
, “
Efficiency of an Inertial Particle Separator
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
31
(
4
), pp.
997
1002
.
4.
Barone
,
D.
,
Loth
,
E.
, and
Snyder
,
P. H
,
2014
, “
Particle Dynamics of a 2-D Inertial Particle Separator
,”
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Düsseldorf, Germany
, p.
V01AT01A039
.
5.
Barone
,
D.
,
Loth
,
E.
, and
Snyder
,
P
,
2012
, “
A 2-d Inertial Particle Separator Research Facility
,”
28th Aerodynamic Measurement Technology, Ground Testing, and Flight Testing Conference Including the Aerospace T&E Days Forum
,
New Orleans, LA
, p.
3290
.
6.
Barone
,
D. L.
,
Hawkins
,
J.
,
Loth
,
E.
, and
Snyder
,
P. H.
,
2013
, “
Inertial Particle Separator Efficiency Using Spherical Particles
,”
49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference
,
San Jose, CA
, p.
3666
.
7.
Vittal
,
B.
,
Tipton
,
D.
and
Bennett
,
W. A.
,
1986
, “
Development of an Advanced Vaneless Inlet Particle Separator for Helicopter Engines
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
2
(
5
), pp.
438
444
.
8.
Jiang
,
L. Y.
,
Benner
,
M.
, and
Bird
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Assessment of Scavenge Efficiency for a Helicopter Particle Separation System
,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
,
57
(
2
), pp.
41
48
.
9.
Hamed
,
A.
,
Jun
,
Y. D.
, and
Yeuan
,
J. J.
,
1995
, “
Particle Dynamics Simulations in Inlet Separator With an Experimentally Based Bounce Model
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
11
(
2
), pp.
230
235
.
10.
Connolly
,
B. J.
,
Loth
,
E.
, and
Smth
,
C. F.
,
2019
, “
Unsteady Simulation of an Inertial Particle Separator
,”
AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum
,
Indianapolis, IN
, p.
4342
.
11.
Barone
,
D. L.
,
Loth
,
E.
, and
Snyder
,
P. H.
,
2014
, “
Fluid Dynamics of an Inertial Particle Separator
,”
52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting
,
National Harbor, MD
, p.
1314
.
12.
Castaldi
,
M.
,
Mayo
,
I.
,
Demolis
,
J.
, and
Eulitz
,
F.
,
2023
, “
Numerical Modelling of the 3D, Unsteady Flow of an Inlet Particle Separator for Turboshaft Engines
,”
Int. J. Turbo. Prop. Power
,
8
(
4
), p.
20
.
13.
Castaldi
,
M.
,
Mayo
,
I.
,
Demolis
,
J.
, and
Eulitz
,
F.
,
2023
, “
Structural Characterization of a Rapid-Prototyped Inlet Particle Separator Model for Aerodynamic Lab Testing.
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Boston, MA
, p.
V11BT23A001
.
14.
Choi
,
H.
, and
Moin
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Grid-Point Requirements for Large Eddy Simulation: Chapmans Estimates Revisited
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
24
(
1
), p.
011702
.
15.
Shih
,
T.-H.
,
Liou
,
W. W.
,
Shabbir
,
A.
,
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
,
1994
, “
A New k-Epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation
,” Technical Report.
16.
Kader
,
B.
, and
ANSYS FLUENT
,
1981
, “
Temperature and Concentration Profiles in Fully Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
24
(
9
), pp.
1541
1544
. DOI:10.1016/0017-9310(81)90220-9
17.
Barone
,
D.
,
Loth
,
E.
, and
Snyder
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Influence of Particle Size on Inertial Particle Separator Efficiency
,”
Powder Technol.
,
318
, pp.
177
185
.
18.
Ducros
,
F.
,
Nicoud
,
F.
, and
Poinsot
,
T.
,
1998
, “
Wall-Adapting Local Eddy-Viscosity Models for Simulations in Complex Geometries
,”
Num. Methods Fluid Dyn.
,
6
(
6
), pp.
293
299
.
19.
Piscaglia
,
F.
,
Montorfano
,
A.
,
Onorati
,
A.
, and
Brusiani
,
F.
,
2014
, “
Boundary Conditions and SGS Models for LES of Wall-Bounded Separated Flows: An Application to Enginelike Geometries
,”
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. RevuedIFP Energies Nouvelles
,
69
(
1
), pp.
11
27
.
20.
Arya
,
N.
, and
De
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Effect of Grid Sensitivity on the Performance of Wall Adapting SGS Models for LES of Swirling and Separating–Reattaching Flows
,”
Comput. Math. Appl.
,
78
(
6
), pp.
2035
2051
.
21.
International Organization for Standardization
,
2022
, “
ISO 5167-1:2022, Measurement of Fluid Flowby Means of Pressure Differential Devices Inserted in Circular Cross-Section Conduits Running Full
,” https://www.iso.org/standard/79179.html
You do not currently have access to this content.